Featured Product

    Fernando Restoy of FSI Speaks on Proportionality in Banking Regulation

    July 04, 2018

    At the Westminster Business Forum in London, the FSI Chairman Fernando Restoy spoke about the application of proportionality in banking regulation. He reviewed the concept, motivation, and the constraints associated with the proportionality principle and compared the different approaches in various jurisdictions, while using some work that has been recently done at the FSI of BIS.

    He believes that it may make sense to adjust the regulatory requirements applied to smaller and/or less complex institutions to alleviate the excessive regulatory burden that they would otherwise face. However, the design of such a proportionality regime will need to meet a number of conditions. First, it should not dilute institutions' capacity to absorb losses or face liquidity shocks. A proportionality regime must focus on reducing complexity without undermining the fundamental prudential safeguards to avoid compromising financial stability. Second, the proportionality regime should not overprotect small or medium-size institutions against competitive forces. In particular, proportionality should not generate spurious incentives for banks to remain small or simple if there are competitive forces that promote consolidation, potentially leading to a more efficient banking industry. Technological developments and overcapacity in some jurisdictions are examples of competitive forces that help to shape market structure.

    He explained that the results of an FSI study showed the approaches to tailoring regulatory requirements to different classes of institutions vary markedly across jurisdictions. They could be broadly classified into the categorization approach and the specific standard approach. Under the categorization approach, which is followed in Switzerland and Brazil, banks are classified into a few categories according to their size or complexity and a specific set of rules is applied for all banks within each category. Under the specific standard approach, which is being used in EU and to some extent the United States—exceptions are applied to each relevant regulatory obligation (for example: liquidity, market risk, or reporting requirements) for banks meeting specific criteria. The categorization approach is certainly simpler and more transparent. However, the specific standard approach permits a finer adjustment of the requirements to the characteristics of the supervised institutions; it allows exemptions or simpler versions of specific requirements to be adopted only for banks for which the original rules are considered unnecessarily complex from a prudential point of view.

    The study also shows that, in most jurisdictions, the proportionality regime affects a variety of regulatory requirements. Within Pillar 1, the standards on market and liquidity risk are the ones most often tailored to specific institutions. Within Pillar 2, proportionality often affects stress testing requirements and procedures for the supervisory review process. Proportionality regimes also typically include simpler reporting and disclosure requirements for small firms. The analysis shows that proportionality does not normally imply reduced minimum capital ratios for smaller or less complex institutions. Yet the application of some simplified approaches to assess the solvency, liquidity, and risk profile of the institutions and the reduced reporting and disclosure requirements may collectively have prudential relevance. The reduced frequency of reporting requirements for small institutions—which is allowed in some jurisdictions and is a subject of discussion in EU—may hamper the ability of supervisors to properly monitor emerging risks.

    In view of these prudential considerations, some jurisdictions are considering the possibility of accompanying the application of simplified requirements to some institutions with the introduction of a more demanding coverage of risks. A case in point is the recent legislation passed by the US Congress in which institutions with a balance sheet below USD 10 billion may be exempted from meeting standard minimum risk-based capital ratios if they keep their leverage ratios—whose calculation is simpler—substantially above the ones required under the Basel standards. This combination of simplicity with additional stringency would seem to be a promising formula for the calibration of proportionality regimes and one that might be well worth exploring in other jurisdictions.

     

    Related Link: Speech

    Keywords: International, Banking, Proportionality, Basel III, Reporting, FSI

    Featured Experts
    Related Articles
    News

    APRA Consults to Standardize Submission Date for Quarterly Reporting

    APRA proposed to standardize quarterly reporting due dates for authorized deposit-taking institutions. The proposed standardized due date is 35 calendar days after the last day of the reference quarter, which will create a 14-calendar-day extension for credit unions and building societies.

    November 08, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Single Rulebook Q&A: First Update for November 2019

    EBA updated the Single Rulebook question and answer (Q&A) tool with answers to two questions. The answers provide clarifications on topics related to own funds and strong customer authentication under the revised Payment Services Directive or PSD2.

    November 08, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FED Proposes to Extend Initial Compliance Dates Under SCCL Rule

    FED published a proposal to extend, by 18 months, the initial compliance dates for foreign banks subject to the single-counterparty credit limit (SCCL) rule.

    November 08, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Publishes Technical Package on Reporting Framework 2.9.1

    EBA published a new release of the reporting framework 2.9.1. This release includes validation rules, Data Point Model (DPM) data dictionary, XBRL taxonomy, and other supporting documents. Additionally, the release fixes some modeling issues on COREP Liquidity and FINREP.

    November 08, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Publishes Methodology and Draft Templates for Stress Tests in 2020

    EBA published a package for the 2020 EU-wide stress test exercise for banks.

    November 07, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EC Publishes Results of Fitness Check of Reporting Requirements in EU

    EC published results of the fitness check of supervisory reporting requirements in financial services legislation in EU.

    November 07, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BCBS Assesses NSFR and LE Rules in Argentina and China as Compliant

    BCBS published reports that assess the implementation of net stable funding ratio (NSFR) and large exposures, or LE, framework in Argentina and China.

    November 07, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FSB Publishes Summary of Plenary Meeting in Paris

    At the meeting, the Plenary reviewed vulnerabilities in the global financial system, fintech developments (including developments in the crypto-asset markets), ongoing work of FSB, and the work program for 2020.

    November 07, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    HKMA Highlights Technology Initiatives at the Hong Kong FinTech Week

    HKMA co-organized, with InvestHK, the Hong Kong FinTech Week 2019, which was a five-day flagship fintech event that attracted thousands of attendees worldwide.

    November 06, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ECB Report on Fallback Provisions in Contracts Referencing EURIBOR

    ECB published a report, by private sector working group on euro risk-free rates, presenting recommendations for fallback provisions in contracts for cash products and derivative transactions referencing EURIBOR.

    November 06, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 4118