RBNZ released the Statement of Intent for 2020–2023, which details its key regulatory priorities and focus areas for this period. One of the recent focus areas is Phase 2 of the Review of the Reserve Bank Act on the regulation of deposit takers and the introduction of a deposit insurance scheme. In light of the challenges posed by the pandemic, RBNZ has decided to extend the third round of consultation for Phase 2 of the Review of the Act by six months from the original deadline for submissions and the new deadline will be October 23, 2020.
In addition to supporting recovery from the economic impact of COVID-19 crisis, RBNZ is focused on a wide range of initiatives, including assisting the transition to a low-carbon future through the climate change work, preparing for changes to its governing legislation, making the most of opportunities associated with fintech, and collaborating closely with industry, government, and co-regulators in the best interest of all New Zealanders. Work in the area of climate risk involves Climate-related Financial Disclosures proposal, Sustainable Finance Forum Interim Report, National Climate Change Adaptation Risk Assessment/Plan, contribution to a COVID-19 recovery that is cognizant of climate risks and opportunities, and working with stakeholders including the Network for Greening the Financial System, the Sustainable Insurance Forum, BIS, and other international bodies. RBNZ will continue to work closely with stakeholders to identify and remove any unnecessary barriers to new firms entering the system or obstructions for incumbent firms developing fintech solutions. RBNZ will also finish the review of the Reserve Bank Act to put in place a single regulatory regime for all deposit-takers. Additionally, for an initial period of generally six months, RBNZ has deferred the following initiatives and will review and communicate an update on its position later in 2020:
- Implementation of planned increases to capital requirements by at least 12 months and imposing dividend restrictions to ensure banks use current capital buffers to support lending
- Review of the bank liquidity thematic review (and subsequent review of the liquidity policy
- Review of the Insurance (Prudential Supervision) Act 2010
- Standard terms for Residential Mortgage Obligations
- Cyber resilience guidelines for all regulated entities
- Revisions to banks’ disclosure of regulatory breaches
- Review of the stress-testing framework and planned bank stress-tests
- Revising the process for approving banks’ internal capital adequacy models for credit risk
RBNZ also released the results of a survey assessing the central bank's delivery on the commitments set out in its relationship charter. The results showed banks were generally positive about their relationship with the RBNZ staff, its communications, and its willingness to ask for feedback. RBNZ will be working in the year ahead to respond to the lessons from the survey.
Keywords: Asia Pacific, New Zealand, Banking, Insurance, Capital Framework, Climate Change Risk, ESG, Fintech, COVID-19, Stress Testing, Basel, RBNZ
Previous ArticlePRA Consults on Implementation of Certain Provisions of CRD5
APRA issued a letter on the loss-absorbing capacity (LAC) requirements for domestic systemically important banks (D-SIBs) and published a discussion paper, along with the proposed the prudential standards on financial contingency planning (CPS 190) and resolution planning (CPS 900).
The European Commission (EC) launched a call for evidence, until March 18, 2022, as part of a comprehensive review of the macro-prudential rules for the banking sector under the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) and Directive (CRD IV).
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a report that sets out good practices for crisis management groups.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) found that Heritage Bank Limited had incorrectly reported capital because of weaknesses in operational risk and compliance frameworks, although the bank did not breach minimum prudential capital ratios at any point and remains well-capitalized.
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) released the annual report for 2020-2021.
Through a letter addressed to the banking sector entities, the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) announced deferral of the domestic implementation of the final Basel III reforms from the first to the second quarter of 2023.
EIOPA recently published a letter in which EC is informing the European Parliament and Council that it could not adopt the set of draft regulatory technical standards for disclosures under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) within the stipulated three-month period, given their length and technical detail.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published the third in a series of policy statements that set out rules to introduce the UK Investment Firm Prudential Regime (IFPR), which will take effect on January 01, 2022.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published, along with a summary of its response to the consultation feedback, an information paper that summarizes the finalized capital framework that is in line with the internationally agreed Basel III requirements for banks.
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) issued a consultative report focusing on access to central counterparty (CCP) clearing and client-position portability.