Featured Product

    FSI on Use of Accounting Standards for Insurer Solvency Assessment

    July 31, 2020

    The Financial Stability Institute (FSI) of BIS published a paper that explores the use of accounting standards for insurer solvency assessment in the context of the implementation of the IFRS 17 standard on insurance contracts. The paper, which is based on a survey of 20 insurance supervisors worldwide, discusses the changes in comparison to the older IFRS 4 standard, the potential impact of IFRS 17 on insurers, the associated implementation challenges, the use of this standard for prudential frameworks, and the related regulatory and supervisory implications. The paper argues that jurisdictions that are not intending to implement IFRS 17 for regulatory solvency purposes should reconsider this position, in the medium term, after gaining some experience with IFRS 17.

    The paper emphasizes that supervisors can play a role in helping to address the implementation challenges associated with IFRS 17. Supervisors are encouraged to undertake impact assessments of the introduction of IFRS 17 and IFRS 9 in their jurisdictions even if they do not have immediate plans to use IFRS for prudential purposes. IFRS 17 and IFRS 9 taken together result in restatement of the largest components of both sides of the balance sheet of an insurer. These revised standards will shape the way senior management strategically drives the future business of insurers and will also shape the risk management practices of insurers. The potential financial impact of IFRS 17 is unclear, as most jurisdictions have not undertaken a quantitative impact study. Some jurisdictions plan to review their capital adequacy frameworks in response to IFRS 17. The new accounting standards will not be the top priority for insurance supervisors or insurers during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the January 2023 implementation date is looming. Supervisors and insurers can only afford a relatively short period of diverting resources from the implementation of IFRS 17 and IFRS 9 to address the pandemic. Initial impact analysis should ideally start by the beginning of 2021 at the latest.

    Overall, the paper concludes that IFRS 17 is expected to bring positive benefits to the insurance industry in the long term as well as to financial stability. However, more work needs to be done to fully understand the potential impact of IFRS 17, the most significant development in the insurance industry in recent years. The prudential implications of IFRS 17 need to be fully appreciated, regardless of whether regulatory frameworks use the accounting standard to assess the solvency of insurers. There is likely to be a wide range of regulatory approaches to the use of IFRS 17 or other accounting standards for insurance contracts for regulatory solvency purposes. If IFRS 17 is to be used for regulatory solvency purposes, further consideration should be given to achieving the desired comparability of results and addressing the unintended consequences that could arise from volatility of solvency results. 

    One way forward would be to specify aspects of IFRS 17 implementation where currently a wide range of techniques and inputs may be used. The specification could mirror what is provided in current regulatory valuation approaches (for example, specified discount rate methodologies or published discount curves could be applied in the IFRS 17 context). This may also lead to a consistent implementation of IFRS 17 within jurisdictions to the benefit of all stakeholders. Greater specification of the techniques and inputs to be used in IFRS 17 for regulatory solvency purposes should be developed through global coordination to avoid local versions of IFRS 17 being created. Significant regional and global consultation with the insurance industry, professional bodies, investor stakeholders, and consumer groups would be required to achieve this outcome. Jurisdictions with insurance groups that have considerable business outside their borders may find merit in coming together to work on such a project. Such jurisdictions would derive the most benefit from a globally consistent approach to regulatory solvency calculation within IFRS jurisdictions and more consistency of general purpose financial reporting.

     

    Related Links

    Keywords: International, Accounting, Insurance, Insurance Contracts, IFRS 9, IFRS 17, Insurer Solvency Assessment, Financial Instruments, Regulatory Capital, COVID-19, Impact Analysis, FSI

    Featured Experts
    Related Articles
    News

    APRA Finalizes Guidance on Management of Climate Change Risks

    The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) released the final Prudential Practice Guide on management of climate change financial risks (CPG 229) for banks, insurers, and superannuation trustees.

    November 26, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    European Council Adopts Position on Digital Finance Package Proposals

    The European Council adopted its position on two proposals that are part of the digital finance package adopted by the European Commission in September 2020, with one of the proposals involving the regulation on markets in crypto-assets (MiCA) and the other involving the Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA).

    November 25, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    PRA Proposes Rulebook Changes; BoE Extends BEEDS Testing Window

    The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) is proposing, via the consultation paper CP21/21, to apply group provisions in the Operational Resilience Part of the PRA Rulebook (relevant for the Capital Requirements Regulation or CRR firms) to holding companies.

    November 25, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EC Proposes New Measures Under Capital Markets Union Package

    The European Commission (EC) has adopted a package of measures related to the Capital Markets Union.

    November 25, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Publishes Standards to Calculate Risk-Weights of CIUs Under CRR

    The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final report on draft regulatory technical standards for the calculation of risk-weighted exposure amounts of collective investment undertakings or CIUs, in line with the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).

    November 24, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FED Outlines Lending Conditions and Supervisory Activities in H1 2021

    The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FED) published a report that summarizes banking conditions in the United States, along with the supervisory and regulatory activities of FED.

    November 24, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    APRA Expects Boards to Strengthen Ability to Oversee Cyber Resilience

    The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) recently completed two pilot initiatives in its 2020-2024 Cyber Security Strategy, which was published in November 2020.

    November 23, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FSB Updates List of Global Systemically Important Banks

    The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) published further information related to its 2021 assessment of global systemically important banks (G-SIBs), with additional details to help understand the scoring methodology.

    November 23, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FASB Proposes Improvements to Credit Losses Standard

    The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) is consulting on an Accounting Standards Update and the associated taxonomy improvements for requirements on troubled debt restructurings and vintage disclosures under the credit losses standard (for financial instruments) topic 326.

    November 23, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    US Agencies Issue Statement on Crypto-Asset Policy Initiatives

    US Agencies issued a statement that summarizes the work undertaken during the interagency policy sprints focused on crypto-assets and provides a roadmap of future work related to crypto-assets.

    November 23, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 7733