The Danish Financial Supervisory Authority (FSA) published the results for the Danish participants of the EU-wide stress test 2021. Danske Bank, Nykredit, Jyske Bank, and Sydbank are the four Danish banks that participated in the stress test. The results showed that the capital situation in the Danish institutions is significantly affected by the severe economic downturn in the adverse scenario. Danish FSA also published the individual stress test results for these banks.
Danish FSA notes that this is a very severe stress test, which leads to significant decreases in the capital ratios of the institutions. For Danske Bank, the decrease is of such a magnitude that the institution has to make use of the capital conservation buffer over the three-year projection. Jyske Bank fulfils its capital requirements, though with modest excess capital. The results show that the capitalization of some of the largest Danish institutions does come under pressure in the EU-wide stress test. However, all Danish institutions retain capital that is comfortably above their solvency need. The results reflect a very severe adverse scenario, which is assumed to build on an already stressed macroeconomic starting point as a result of the COVID-19 crisis. The results underline the need for institutions to maintain a robust capitalization going forward. The results of the EU-wide stress test will be included in the Danish FSA considerations regarding the setting of the Pillar 2 Guidance, or P2G, for the participating Danish institutions. The Pillar 2 Guidance can be interpreted as a prudential add-on to the solvency need. The ongoing dialog of Danish FSA with the institutions, on capital targets and distribution policy, will continue to be based on stress tests based on scenarios and assumptions laid down by the Danish FSA.
Keywords: Europe, Denmark, Banking, Stress Testing, COVID-19, Regulatory Capital, Pillar 2, Pillar 2 Guidance, SREP, Danish FSA
Next ArticleEBA Clarifies Issues Raised on APIs Under PSD2
In a letter addressed to the industry, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) set out an updated schedule of policy priorities for the banking, insurance, and superannuation industries.
The European Commission (EC) adopted a comprehensive review package of Solvency II rules in the European Union.
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) issued Versions 1.0 of the "Earnings" and "Regulatory Reporting" booklets of the Comptroller's Handbook.
The European Central Bank (ECB) published results of its economy-wide climate stress test, which aimed to assess the resilience of non-financial corporates and euro area banks to climate risks.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published a report on the use of digital platforms in the banking and payments sector in European Union.
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) published updates on the policy measures that were announced in context of the ongoing pandemic.
The International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA), along with several other associations, submitted a joint response to the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) consultation on preliminary proposals for the prudential treatment of cryptoasset exposures.
BIS published the September issue of the Quarterly Review, which contains special features that analyze the rapid rise in equity funding for financial technology firms, the effectiveness of policy measures in response to pandemic, and the evolution of international banking.
The Basel Committee for Banking Supervision (BCBS) met in September 2021 and reviewed climate-related financial risks, discussed impact of digitalization, and welcomed efforts by the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) Foundation to develop a common set of sustainability reporting standards
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) issued a Cease and Desist Order against MUFG Union Bank for deficiencies in technology and operational risk governance.