EC is seeking feedback, until October 08, 2020, for an initiative that would involve development of proposal for a directive on sustainable corporate governance. The initiative aims to ensure that sustainability is further embedded into the corporate governance framework with a view to better align the long-term interests of management, shareholders, stakeholders, and society. It aims to improve the framework to incentivize corporate boards to integrate properly stakeholder interests, sustainability risks, dependencies, opportunities, and adverse impact into strategies, decisions, and oversight. A public consultation on sustainable corporate governance is planned to be launched in the third quarter of 2020. EC plans to adopt the directive by the first quarter of 2021.
EC also published the findings of its study on directors' duties and sustainable corporate governance. The study shows that many companies, in particular those listed on regulated markets, face pressure to focus on generating financial return in a short timeframe and redistribute a large part of the income generated to shareholders, which may be to the detriment of the long-term development of the company as well as of sustainability. This EC initiative would create legal certainty and level playing field for the necessary measures to be taken by companies to identify, assess, and mitigate adverse impacts in the value chain. An EU-level initiative could include the appropriate combination of the following corporate and directors’ duties with a view to requiring limited liability companies “not to do harm” and to empowering corporate directors to integrate wider interests into decisions:
- Companies to take measures to address their adverse sustainability impacts in the areas of climate change and environmental and human rights harm in their own operations and in their value chain by identifying and preventing relevant risks and by mitigating negative impacts (due diligence duty)
- Company directors to take into account all stakeholder interests that are relevant for long-term sustainability of the firm and to define and integrate stakeholder interests and corporate sustainability risks, impacts, and opportunities into the corporate strategy
- An appropriate facilitating, enforcement, and implementation mechanism accompanying these duties, including possible remediation where necessary
- Other possible corporate governance arrangements, for example, regarding directors remuneration
Depending on the scope and detail of the initiative, it will need to be established which issues would need to be laid down in legislation and which issues would rather have their place in complementary guidance. This initiative will need to be coherent and consistent with the review of the Non-financial Reporting Directive (NFRD). The new sustainable corporate governance framework would bring benefits to companies as well as to the economy, in particular in the medium to long-term. The majority of a large sample of surveyed companies (mostly large) expect significant or very significant economic benefits arising from a corporate due diligence duty. This, together with potential new directors’ duties and other elements of the new sustainable corporate governance framework, would positively contribute to the productivity, profitability, and attractiveness of EU businesses due to a better management of sustainability-related risks, reaping opportunities, and better taking into account the interests of all stakeholders.
The new sustainable corporate governance framework would improve the resilience of companies vis-à-vis changing environmental or social circumstances, or to sudden shocks (like the COVID-19 pandemic). As first movers in the sustainability transition, EU companies could gain remarkable competitive advantages on global markets. Introducing harmonized EU rules would level the playing field in the EU internal market, which may also save certain costs compared to what companies are doing now, trying to keep up with various recommendations and expectations. The new framework would also contribute to macroeconomic growth and the increased investment into innovation, research, and technological development. Due consideration will need to be given to limiting and alleviating the burden for small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs), for instance, by the inclusion of exemptions from certain substantive and possible reporting obligations and/or by simplified standard(s), according to the proportionality principle, based on the size and impact of the company.
- Notification and Impact Assessment of EC Initiative
- Notification on EC Study
- Study on Sustainable Corporate Governance
Comment Due Date: October 08, 2020
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Insurance, Securities, ESG, Sustainable Finance, Governance, Corporate Governance, Sustainability, NFRD, Climate Change Risk, EC
Previous ArticleEBA Publishes Risk Dashboard for First Quarter of 2020
PRA published the policy statement PS8/21, which contains the final supervisory statement SS3/21 on the PRA approach to supervision of the new and growing non-systemic banks in UK.
EBA published a report that sets out the final draft regulatory technical standards specifying the conditions according to which consolidation shall be carried out in line with Article 18 of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
EBA updated the list of other systemically important institutions (O-SIIs) in EU.
BCBS published two reports that discuss transmission channels of climate-related risks to the banking system and the measurement methodologies of climate-related financial risks.
UK Authorities (FCA and PRA) welcomed the findings of FSB peer review on the implementation of financial sector remuneration reforms in the UK.
PRA and FCA jointly issued a letter that highlights risks associated with the increasing volumes of deposits that are placed with banks and building societies via deposit aggregators and how to mitigate these risks.
MFSA announced that amendments to the Banking Act, Subsidiary Legislation, and Banking Rules will be issued in the coming months, to transpose the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5) into the national regulatory framework.
EC finalized the Delegated Regulation 2021/598 that supplements the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR or 575/2013) and lays out the regulatory technical standards for assigning risk-weights to specialized lending exposures.
OSFI launched a consultation to explore ways to enhance the OSFI assurance over capital, leverage, and liquidity returns for banks and insurers, given the increasing complexity arising from the evolving regulatory reporting framework due to IFRS 17 (Insurance Contracts) standard and Basel III reforms.
ECB published results of the benchmarking analysis of the recovery plan cycle for 2019.