EC released a communication setting out the comprehensive approach and recent legislative improvements in terms of how EC grants equivalence to non-EU countries. EC also published certain implementing decisions on the equivalence for financial benchmarks and credit rating agencies in various non-EU countries. The implementing decisions shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of their publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
EC has adopted equivalence decisions for financial benchmarks administered in Australia and Singapore. These equivalence decisions recognize that the administrators of certain interest rates and foreign exchange benchmarks in Australia and Singapore are subject to legally binding requirements that are equivalent to the EU requirements set out under Benchmark Regulation (EU 2016/1011). Separately, EC has extended existing equivalence decisions in the field of credit rating agencies for Hong Kong, Japan, Mexico, and the United States. EC has, for the first time, repealed existing decisions for Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, and Singapore, as these jurisdictions could no longer meet the standards set by the EU Credit Rating Agencies Regulation after its amendment in 2013.
The EC communication describes how EC and ESAs monitor the situation in those countries after equivalence decisions have been taken, to ensure that these continue to fulfill EU objectives and preserve financial stability, investor protection, market integrity, and a level playing field in EU. This communication also provides an overview of how recent EU legislative changes have strengthened the equivalence framework—both in terms of initial assessments and ex-post monitoring—particularly with the increased role for ESAs. These recent legislative changes, for instance in the amended ESA regulations, strengthen the roles of these EU authorities in monitoring equivalent third countries. The EC communication also sets out how recent updates to EU legislation will ensure even greater effectiveness of the single rulebook, supervision, and monitoring while fostering cross-border business in global markets. EC has, to date, taken over 280 equivalence decisions with regard to over 30 countries.
EU equivalence has become a significant tool in recent years, fostering integration of global financial markets and cooperation with the third-country authorities. EU assesses the overall policy context and to what extent the regulatory regimes of a given third country achieve the same outcomes as its own rules. A positive equivalence decision, which is a unilateral measure by EC, allows EU authorities to rely on third-country rules and supervision, thus enabling market participants from third countries who are active in EU to comply with only one set of rules.
Effective Date: August 19, 2019 (implementing decisions)
Keywords: Europe, EU, Asia Pacific, Americas, Hong Kong, Japan, US, Mexico, Australia, Singapore, Brazil, Canada, Argentina, Bank9ing, Securities, CRA, Equivalence Decisions, Third Country, CRA Regulation, ESAs, EC
Previous ArticleEBA Opinion on Measures to Address Macro-Prudential Risk in Finland
EBA issued a revised list of validation rules with respect to the implementing technical standards on supervisory reporting.
EBA published its response to the call for advice of EC on ways to strengthen the EU legal framework on anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT).
NGFS published a paper on the overview of environmental risk analysis by financial institutions and an occasional paper on the case studies on environmental risk analysis methodologies.
MAS published the guidelines on individual accountability and conduct at financial institutions.
APRA published final versions of the prudential standard APS 220 on credit quality and the reporting standard ARS 923.2 on repayment deferrals.
SRB published two articles, with one article discussing the framework in place to safeguard financial stability amid crisis and the other article outlining the path to a harmonized and predictable liquidation regime.
FSB hosted a virtual workshop as part of the consultation process for its evaluation of the too-big-to-fail reforms.
ECB updated the list of supervised entities in EU, with the number of significant supervised entities being 115.
OSFI published the key findings of a study on third-party risk management.
FSB is extending the implementation timeline, by one year, for the minimum haircut standards for non-centrally cleared securities financing transactions or SFTs.