IASB Proposes to Amend Requirements for Insurers Applying IFRS 9
The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) proposed a narrow-scope amendment to the transition requirements in IFRS 17 on insurance contracts. The proposed amendment relates to financial assets for which comparative information presented on the initial application of IFRS 17 and IFRS 9 on financial instruments has not been restated for IFRS 9. Applying the proposed amendment, a company would be permitted to present comparative information about such a financial asset as if the classification and measurement requirements of IFRS 9 had been applied to that financial asset. The comment period is open until September 27, 2021, with the Board planning to complete any resulting amendment by the end of 2021.
Many insurers will apply IFRS 17 and IFRS 9 for the first time from 2023 and are at an advanced stage of preparing to apply these new standards. However, some of these insurers have informed IASB about significant temporary accounting mismatches on initial application of the new standards that can make the change in accounting more difficult to communicate to investors. These mismatches arise in circumstances when IFRS 9 is not reflected in the accounting for financial assets in the prior periods presented when IFRS 17 and IFRS 9 are first applied. The proposed narrow-scope amendment to IFRS 17 would enable the insurers to address this issue by giving them an option to present comparative information for certain financial assets in a manner consistent with IFRS 9.
IASB acknowledged that amending IFRS 17 so close to the effective date might appear to be inconsistent with the intention of providing a stable basis for the implementation of IFRS 17. However, in the Board’s view, introducing new transition relief at this stage is justified because entities became aware of the significant impact of the differing transition requirements, in particular the potential magnitude of accounting mismatches, only during the advanced stage of implementation. Furthermore, the Board concluded that the proposed amendment could be finalized in a timely manner without disrupting implementation because the proposed classification overlay is an optional relief and, therefore, would not impose changes on entities; moreover, this relates only to the presentation of comparative information on initial application and has no effect on the application of IFRS 17 and IFRS 9 after the date of initial application. The proposed amendment does not affect any other requirement in IFRS 17 and does not propose any change to the transition requirements in IFRS 9.
Comment Due Date: September 27, 2021
Keywords: International, Insurance, IFRS 17, IFRS 9, Insurance Contracts, Reporting, Financial Instruments, IASB
Featured Experts
Masha Muzyka
CECL, IFRS 9, and IFRS 17 expert; credit risk and insurance risk specialist; strategic planning and credit analytics solutions consultant
Metin Epözdemir
Metin Epözdemir helps European and African banks with design and implementation of credit risk, stress testing, capital management, and credit loss accounting solutions.
Dieter Van der Stock
IFRS subject matter expert; LDTI subject matter expert; accounting authority; risk management specialist
Previous Article
EBA Guide to Monitor Threshold for Intermediate Parent UndertakingsRelated Articles
APRA Issues Interim Update to Policy Priorities for 2021 and Beyond
In a letter addressed to the industry, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) set out an updated schedule of policy priorities for the banking, insurance, and superannuation industries.
EC Adopts Solvency II and Resolution Rules Package for Insurers
The European Commission (EC) adopted a comprehensive review package of Solvency II rules in the European Union.
OCC Issues Booklets on Regulatory Reporting and Earnings
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) issued Versions 1.0 of the "Earnings" and "Regulatory Reporting" booklets of the Comptroller's Handbook.
ECB Sets Out Results of Economy-Wide Climate Stress Tests
The European Central Bank (ECB) published results of its economy-wide climate stress test, which aimed to assess the resilience of non-financial corporates and euro area banks to climate risks.
EBA Examines Implications of Increasing Use of Digital Platforms in EU
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published a report on the use of digital platforms in the banking and payments sector in European Union.
HKMA Issues Updates on Policy Measures Intended to Ease COVID Impact
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) published updates on the policy measures that were announced in context of the ongoing pandemic.
ISDA Responds to BCBS Proposal on Treatment of Cryptoasset Exposures
The International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA), along with several other associations, submitted a joint response to the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) consultation on preliminary proposals for the prudential treatment of cryptoasset exposures.
BIS Quarterly Review Discusses Developments in Fintech and ESG Space
BIS published the September issue of the Quarterly Review, which contains special features that analyze the rapid rise in equity funding for financial technology firms, the effectiveness of policy measures in response to pandemic, and the evolution of international banking.
BCBS to Consult on Supervisory Practices for Climate Risks by Year-End
The Basel Committee for Banking Supervision (BCBS) met in September 2021 and reviewed climate-related financial risks, discussed impact of digitalization, and welcomed efforts by the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) Foundation to develop a common set of sustainability reporting standards
OCC Identifies Operational Risk Deficiencies in MUFG Union Bank
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) issued a Cease and Desist Order against MUFG Union Bank for deficiencies in technology and operational risk governance.
