The Irving Fisher Committee on Central Bank Statistics (IFC) of BIS published a report that examines the implications of fintech for central bank statistics. The review conducted by the IFC Working Group on Fintech Data Issues finds that, as fintech transforms the financial sector, it also opens up data gaps in central bank statistics by introducing new financial products and bringing existing services to a larger market. Data gaps are prevalent as (internationally comparable) information on fintech is lacking in official statistics. In this context, the report presents a targeted roadmap to construct fintech statistics and presents recommendations for building the internationally harmonized fintech statistics.
The presented roadmap consists of the following six steps:
- The first one is to formulate a classification of fintech that encompasses the various financial market segments of fintech, as data gaps reflect that fintech companies engaged in financial intermediation are not systematically assigned to the financial sector (as identified by the International Standard Industrial Classification of all Economic Activities or ISIC)
- Second, based on this definition, lists of fintech enterprises can be derived from various sources (for example, existing studies, registers).
- Third, linking these lists to existing data in official statistics (for example, balance sheet data) will help to answer economic questions about fintech and allow a more comprehensive understanding of its potential development.
- Fourth, intra- and inter-institutional cooperation shall be fostered, as data from different sources need to be linked, calling for active support of the related international initiatives that are underway (for example, to promote global identifiers).
- Fifth, available data from the internet can be sourced (for example, through artificial-intelligence-supported web search).
- Sixth, the resulting information set can usefully be complemented by surveys or compulsory reporting requirements on aspects for which data of sufficient quality are not available from other reliable sources; the working group notes that the information available varies from country to country, which can call for flexibly adjusting the various national strategies to construct fintech statistics.
The report points out that some central banks are already producing statistics based on new reporting requirements. For example, Bank of Finland has set up new peer-to-peer and crowdfunding statistics. To satisfy the demand from national users for stability analysis and after the Ministry of Finance collected data for 2014–16 to support legislation, Bank of Finland launched an annual collection of crowdfunding and peer-to-peer lending statistics in 2018 and gained further experience over a period of two years. The lessons learned from this are that demand and interest in these new data exist, even though volumes are still low; rapid market developments and emergence of new players make it challenging to keep up with the reporting population; time investment is needed for reporting agent cooperation; experimental statistics can be set up in a cost-effective manner; and profiles of new funding channels are significantly different from traditional bank lending data. Based on its analysis, the Working Group recommends that central banks should:
- Promote the global adoption of a revised classification of economic activities that better takes into consideration fintech service providers
- Ensure that statistical methodologies used to measure fintech activities adhere to sound professional and scientific standards
- Develop a comprehensive process to continuously monitor the situation and address fintech-related data issues that may arise
- Leverage existing IT innovation and accelerate it by promoting technological solutions to facilitate the compilation of fintech statistics (for instance, by making resources available internationally by sharing IT tools through the BIS Innovation Hub
Related Link: Report (PDF)
Keywords: International, Banking, Insurance, Securities, Fintech, Statistics, IFC Working Group, Irving Fisher Committee, Artificial Intelligence, Data Gaps, Regtech, BIS
Previous ArticleRBI Report Examines Stability of Financial Sector in India
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published four draft principles to support supervisory efforts in assessing the representativeness of COVID-19-impacted data for banks using the internal ratings based (IRB) credit risk models.
The European Council and the European Parliament (EP) reached a provisional political agreement on the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD).
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) launched a consultation (CP6/22) that sets out proposal for a new Supervisory Statement on expectations for management of model risk by banks.
The European Commission (EC) published the Delegated Regulation 2022/954, which amends regulatory technical standards on specification of the calculation of specific and general credit risk adjustments.
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hub updated its work program, announcing a set of projects across various centers.
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published two consultation papers—one on the supervisory statement on exclusions related to systemic events and the other on the supervisory statement on the management of non-affirmative cyber exposures.
Certain members of the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs issued a letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published a consultation paper on the advice on the review of the securitization prudential framework in Solvency II.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) issued a statement on PRA buffer adjustment while the Bank of England (BoE) published a notice on the statistical reporting requirements for banks.
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) issued principles for the effective management and supervision of climate-related financial risks.