IMF published a report on results of the Financial System Stability Assessment (FSSA) on France. Also published were the staff report and the selected issues report under the 2018 Article IV consultation with France. The FSSA report highlights that important institutional and policy changes have taken place since the 2012 Financial Sector Assessment Program (FSAP). At the national level, the authorities have strengthened the macro-prudential framework, enhanced monitoring of financial stability risks, prepared to manage the Brexit fall-out, and taken various financial reform measures and initiatives on digital finance, crypto-assets, and green finance. At the European level, significant changes relate to Banking Union, Capital Requirements Regulation/Capital Requirements Directive (CRR/CRD), Solvency II, and efforts toward Capital Markets Union.
The FSSA report notes that the financial system is more resilient than it was in 2012, with an improvement in capital positions and asset quality. Banking and insurance business lines, and the corporate sector, carry important financial vulnerabilities that need close attention. Banks have adequate capital and liquidity buffers to withstand a sizable shock. Banks could face liquidity challenges from large outflows of wholesale funding, including in U.S. dollars, and from any acceleration of fragmentation of international liquidity. Insurers are broadly resilient against market shocks, but vulnerabilities stem from the concentrated exposures, mostly to their parent banks. Solvency ratios of insurers have been stable and bolstered by the effective implementation of Solvency II.
The FSAP identified the following key policy priorities:
- Continue pre-emptive management of systemic risks. To address a buildup of systemic risk including private non-financial sector debt, the authorities have proactively used macro-prudential measures. The authorities should engage with ECB and other EU agencies on the possible use of bank-specific Pillar 2 measures to address bank-specific residual risks from the concentration of exposures to large indebted corporates. In addition, the authorities should consider the use of a sectoral systemic risk buffer (SRB) and the expansion of the macro-prudential toolkit for corporates and non-banks.
- Ensure adequate liquidity management and buffers. While aggregate bank liquidity buffers appear adequate, the supervisory authorities are encouraged to consider imposing additional liquidity buffers in all major currencies to minimize risks related to potential disruptions in wholesale funding in case of severe shocks.
- Further integrate conglomerate-level monitoring and oversight. Common guidance, reporting, integrated liquidity risk management requirements, and stress testing at the conglomerate level can help ensure that risks are promptly identified and addressed. Several of these gaps are universal in nature and would benefit from a broader international effort.
- Enhance governance, financial-sector policies, and financial integrity. In line with international best practices and critical for achieving their technical mandates in an accountable manner, governance and operational independence reforms are required to ensure that the oversight authorities are properly positioned and resourced to deliver their mandates effectively.
- Reinforce crisis management, safety nets, and resolution arrangements. Continued implementation of crisis management instruments created under the EU Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive is essential. Recovery and resolution planning for non-banks needs attention.
The staff report highlighted that IMF Directors commended the authorities’ progress in bolstering the financial system’s resilience, as reflected in the FSAP review, including by taking a proactive macro-prudential response to the buildup of systemic risk from corporate leverage. Directors emphasized the need to continue to monitor systemic risks closely and stand ready to deploy additional macro- and micro-prudential policies as needed. Given the global significance and complexity of financial system in France, Directors emphasized further integrating monitoring and oversight at the conglomerate level, strengthening liquidity-risk management in conglomerates, and ensuring adequate liquidity buffers.
Keywords: Europe, France, Banking, Insurance, FSSA, FSAP, Article IV, Systemic Risk, Macro-Prudential Framework, Solvency II, CRR/CRD, BRRD, Governance, Capital Buffers, Stress Testing, IMF
Previous ArticleESRB Updates List of Countercyclical Capital Buffers in January 2019
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) released the final Prudential Practice Guide on management of climate change financial risks (CPG 229) for banks, insurers, and superannuation trustees.
The European Council adopted its position on two proposals that are part of the digital finance package adopted by the European Commission in September 2020, with one of the proposals involving the regulation on markets in crypto-assets (MiCA) and the other involving the Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA).
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) is proposing, via the consultation paper CP21/21, to apply group provisions in the Operational Resilience Part of the PRA Rulebook (relevant for the Capital Requirements Regulation or CRR firms) to holding companies.
The European Commission (EC) has adopted a package of measures related to the Capital Markets Union.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final report on draft regulatory technical standards for the calculation of risk-weighted exposure amounts of collective investment undertakings or CIUs, in line with the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FED) published a report that summarizes banking conditions in the United States, along with the supervisory and regulatory activities of FED.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) recently completed two pilot initiatives in its 2020-2024 Cyber Security Strategy, which was published in November 2020.
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) published further information related to its 2021 assessment of global systemically important banks (G-SIBs), with additional details to help understand the scoring methodology.
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) is consulting on an Accounting Standards Update and the associated taxonomy improvements for requirements on troubled debt restructurings and vintage disclosures under the credit losses standard (for financial instruments) topic 326.
US Agencies issued a statement that summarizes the work undertaken during the interagency policy sprints focused on crypto-assets and provides a roadmap of future work related to crypto-assets.