EBA published an opinion on the link between money laundering and terrorist financing (ML/TF) concerns and prudential objectives. This opinion forms part of the ongoing work of EBA to strengthen the fight against ML/TF in Europe and responds to a request in the Council Anti Money Laundering Action Plan of 2018. With this opinion, EBA invites prudential supervisors to send a common message to institutions that prudential supervisors factor anti-money laundering/countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) issues into the prudential supervisory process and cooperate closely with AML/CFT supervisors for this purpose.
ML/TF can have a significant, adverse impact on an institution's safety and soundness. This is why prudential supervisors need to be aware of, and act on, ML/TF risks, which may pose prudential risks to the institutions they supervise and in particular:
- When considering whether to authorize an institution or when assessing proposed acquisitions of qualifying holdings
- As part of their ongoing supervision of institutions, for example, when assessing the adequacy of the governance and risk management systems of an institution
- When taking corrective measures to address potential weaknesses from a prudential perspective
EU legislators have taken a number of steps to clarify and strengthen the important link between AML/CFT and prudential issues and to complement the existing legal framework in EU. These steps include amendments to the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD), which further clarify the link between prudential supervision and AML/CFT supervision and require prudential supervisors to act on AML/CFT information. The EU Council made clear in its action plan of 2018 that the link between ML/TF risk and prudential objectives means that prudential and AML/CFT supervisors must cooperate closely and share information in the discharge of their respective functions. Where institutions operate across borders, EBA expects supervisors to cooperate with their international counterparts.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, AML/CFT, ML/TF, SREP, AML Action Plan, CRD, Prudential Supervision, EBA
Previous ArticleAPRA Enforces Stable Funding Requirements on Banks
BIS Innovation Hub published the work program for 2021, with focus on suptech and regtech, next-generation financial market infrastructure, central bank digital currencies, open finance, green finance, and cyber security.
In an article published by SRB, Mairead McGuinness, the European Commissioner for Financial Services, Financial Stability, and Capital Markets Union, discussed the progress and next steps toward completion of the Banking Union.
EBA finalized the two sets of draft regulatory technical standards on the identification of material risk-takers and on the classes of instruments used for remuneration under the Investment Firms Directive (IFD).
EC published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, a notification that the European Court of Auditors (ECA) has published a special report on resolution planning in the Single Resolution Mechanism.
BoE published a scenario against which it will be stress testing banks in 2021, in addition to setting out the key elements of the 2021 stress test, guidance on the 2021 stress test, and the variable paths for the 2021 stress test.
PRA published a consultation paper (CP3/21) proposes rules regarding the timing of identity verification required for eligibility of depositor protection under the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS).
FSB published the work program for 2021, which reflects a strategic shift in priorities in the COVID-19 environment.
FCA announced that 50% firms have started using the new data collection platform RegData, which is slated to replace the existing platform known Gabriel.
Bundesbank published Version 5.0 of the derivation rules for completeness check at the form level, with respect to the data quality of the European harmonized reporting system.
FED finalized a rule that updates capital planning requirements to reflect the new framework from 2019 that sorts large banks into categories, with requirements that are tailored to the risks of each category.