PRA published the consultation paper CP10/20, with a proposal to allow certain firms to benefit from simplified obligations for recovery planning. This proposal is in light of the discretion PRA has under 4(1) of the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive or BRRD (2014/59/EU) on whether to apply simplified obligations. The proposal involves changes to the supervisory statement SS9/17 on recovery planning and would reduce recovery planning expectations for certain firms. The comment period on CP10/20 closes on October 23, 2020. In the second half of 2020, PRA plans to publish the final policy statement and to notify the firms that are eligible for simplified obligations. Pending consideration of the responses to CP10/20, the amendments to SS9/17 would apply with immediate effect once the final policy statement is published.
The proposals in CP10/20 relate to how PRA would perform the eligibility assessment process to determine which firms are eligible for simplified obligations in respect of recovery planning. The proposals also address the recovery planning expectations for firms deemed eligible for simplified obligations. For firms that are eligible for simplified obligations, the proposals seek to reduce the minimum number of scenarios considered in recovery planning to two and clarify that these firms are not expected to submit the information recovery plan information template referred to in SS9/17. CP10/20 is relevant to PRA-authorized UK banks, building societies, designated UK investment firms, and their qualifying parent undertakings to which the Recovery Plans Part of the PRA Rulebook applies.
The proposals support the PRA approach to enhanced proportionality for smaller and non-systemic firms. PRA considers that the proposal introduces a more proportionate approach for recovery planning that would not cause firms to incur additional costs as a direct result of the proposals. The proposals set out in CP10/20 have been designed in the context of the withdrawal of UK from EU and entry into the transition period, during which time UK remains subject to the European law. PRA will keep the policy under review to assess whether any changes would be required due to changes in the UK regulatory framework at the end of the transition period, including those arising once any new arrangements with EU take effect. PRA has assessed that the proposals would not need to be amended under the EU (Withdrawal) Act 2018.
Comment Due Date: October 23, 2020
Keywords: Europe, UK, Banking, Securities, Recovery Planning, Basel, BRRD, CP10/20, SS9/17, Resolution Framework, Proportionality, PRA
Previous ArticleHKMA Issues Guidance on Implementing BCBS FAQs on Benchmark Reforms
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) released the final Prudential Practice Guide on management of climate change financial risks (CPG 229) for banks, insurers, and superannuation trustees.
The European Council adopted its position on two proposals that are part of the digital finance package adopted by the European Commission in September 2020, with one of the proposals involving the regulation on markets in crypto-assets (MiCA) and the other involving the Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA).
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) is proposing, via the consultation paper CP21/21, to apply group provisions in the Operational Resilience Part of the PRA Rulebook (relevant for the Capital Requirements Regulation or CRR firms) to holding companies.
The European Commission (EC) has adopted a package of measures related to the Capital Markets Union.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final report on draft regulatory technical standards for the calculation of risk-weighted exposure amounts of collective investment undertakings or CIUs, in line with the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FED) published a report that summarizes banking conditions in the United States, along with the supervisory and regulatory activities of FED.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) recently completed two pilot initiatives in its 2020-2024 Cyber Security Strategy, which was published in November 2020.
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) published further information related to its 2021 assessment of global systemically important banks (G-SIBs), with additional details to help understand the scoring methodology.
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) is consulting on an Accounting Standards Update and the associated taxonomy improvements for requirements on troubled debt restructurings and vintage disclosures under the credit losses standard (for financial instruments) topic 326.
US Agencies issued a statement that summarizes the work undertaken during the interagency policy sprints focused on crypto-assets and provides a roadmap of future work related to crypto-assets.