PRA published the policy statement (PS14/19) containing the updated supervisory statement (SS17/13) on credit risk mitigation (Appendix). PS14/19 also provides feedback to responses to the consultation paper (CP1/19) that proposed changes to SS17/13 to clarify expectations about the eligibility of financial collateral as funded credit protection under Part Three, Title II, Chapter 4 (Credit risk mitigation) of Capital Requirements Regulation or CRR (575/2013). The changes to SS17/13 will be effective on publication of PS14/19.
PS14/19 is relevant to UK banks, building societies, and PRA-designated UK investment firms that are subject to CRR. It is not relevant to the UK branches of firms in other European Economic Area (EEA) countries and non-EEA countries, or to insurance firms. SS17/13 sets out the PRA expectations in respect of the recognition of credit risk mitigation in the calculation of certain risk-weighted exposure amounts. SS17/13 covers elements of the following topics:
- Eligibility of financial institutions as protection providers
- Recognized exchanges
- Conditions for applying a 0% volatility adjustment under the Financial Collateral Comprehensive Method (FCCM)
- Permission to use "own estimates of volatility adjustments" under the FCCM
- Netting of liabilities that may be subject to bail-in
PRA received three responses to CP1/19. In a number of areas, respondents welcomed the clarifications from PRA regarding the eligibility of financial collateral. However, respondents raised concerns aboutthe proposals and their impact on certain types of transactions. Some respondents also requested further clarification on certain aspects of the proposals. The PRA feedback to these responses, along with the final policy decisions, has been set out in Chapter 2 of PS14/19. Following the consideration of responses, PRA has made a number of minor changes to the draft policy that was set out in CP1/19. These changes clarify:
- Where the obligor and the collateral issuer share the same country, this does not necessarily imply there is a material positive correlation
- What assets PRA would consider relevant when it refers to "all of the assets to which the lender has legal recourse"
- How the PRA expectations apply when firms have recourse to a financial collateral asset that is an index instrument
The policy set out in PS14/19 has been designed in the context of the current UK and EU regulatory framework. PRA has assessed that the proposals will not be affected in the event that UK leaves EU with no implementation period in place.
Effective Date: July 23, 2019 (SS17/13)
Keywords: Europe, UK, Banking, Credit Risk Mitigation, Credit Risk, CRR, CP 1/19, SS 17/13, PS 14/19, PRA
Previous ArticleIAIS Publishes Draft Paper on Use of Big Data Analytics in Insurance
The Bank of England (BoE) published a consultation paper on approach to setting minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL), an operational guide on executing bail-in, and a statement from the Deputy Governor Dave Ramsden.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) is seeking preliminary input on standardization of the proportionality assessment methodology for credit institutions and investment firms.
Certain regulatory authorities in the US are extending period for completion of the review of certain residential mortgage provisions and for publication of notice disclosing the determination of this review until December 20, 2021.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the policy statement PS18/21, which introduces an amendment in the definition of "higher paid material risk taker" in the Remuneration Part of the PRA Rulebook.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published its annual report on asset encumbrance in banking sector.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published a methodological guide to mystery shopping.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) released a letter to authorized deposit-taking institutions to provide an update on key policy settings for the capital framework reforms, which will come into effect from January 01, 2023.
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) published a report that assesses the business continuity planning activities of financial market infrastructures or FMIs.
The Bank of England (BoE) published questions and answers (Q&A) on OSCA to BEEDS migration for statistical reporting as well a presentation from the project overview session held with statistical reporters.
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) is consulting on a technical amendment to the Basel Framework to reflect a new process reviewing the global systemically important bank (G-SIB) assessment methodology.