EBA published the IFRS 9 roadmap, which provides a comprehensive overview of the planned monitoring activities on IFRS 9 implementation. EBA also launched an IFRS 9 benchmarking exercise on a sample of institutions, with the aim to analyze the modeling practices followed by institutions and how IFRS 9 implementation impacts the amount of expected credit losses (ECL) in terms of own funds and regulatory ratios.
EBA already conducted several exercises on the IFRS 9 impact on EU institutions and communicated preliminary observations on the first stages of implementation. In the roadmap, EBA clarifies its intention to continue to monitor and promote a consistent application of IFRS 9 and to work on the interaction with prudential requirements. The roadmap includes the different phases of this work from qualitative and quantitative perspectives and this work will take place in the coming months and years. While EBA has already communicated the rationale underpinning the qualitative monitoring, the purpose of this roadmap is to clarify further the next steps with regard to the quantitative monitoring. An important aspect of the quantitative monitoring is the use of selected indicators extracted from regulatory reporting.
Another major aspect of the quantitative monitoring is the benchmarking of the modeling techniques used by EU institutions for IFRS 9 purposes. The IFRS 9 benchmarking exercise represents an important step in the context of the ongoing quantitative monitoring activities. The focus of this exercise is to assess whether the use of different modeling techniques and inputs can lead to significant inconsistencies in terms of the ECL amount that directly impacts own funds and regulatory ratios. EBA will leverage on its experience and expertise on benchmarking of prudential models already gained by regulators and supervisors. During the first phase of the IFRS 9 benchmarking exercise, the objective is to collect information on modeling practices and to perform a first assessment on quantitative parameters to be reported by institutions. The sample of institutions is similar to the one used for the previous EBA reports on IFRS 9. EBA will continue to engage closely with all concerned stakeholders for the purpose of this exercise and more generally for the purpose of its monitoring work on IFRS 9 implementation.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, IFRS 9, Expected Credit Loss, ECL, Credit Risk, Roadmap, IFRS 9 Benchmarking, EBA
Previous ArticleEIOPA Publishes Q&A on Regulations in July 2019
FED finalized a rule that updates capital planning requirements to reflect the new framework from 2019 that sorts large banks into categories, with requirements that are tailored to the risks of each category.
ECB published results of the quarterly lending survey conducted on 143 banks in the euro area.
ESAs published the final draft implementing technical standards on reporting of intra-group transactions and risk concentration of financial conglomerates subject to the supplementary supervision in EU.
EBA published the annual report on asset encumbrance of banks in EU.
MAS revised the guidelines that address technology and cyber risks of financial institutions, in an environment of growing use of cloud technologies, application programming interfaces, and rapid software development.
FED updated the reporting form and instructions for the FR Y-9C report on consolidated financial statements for holding companies.
EBA issued a consultation paper on the guidelines on monitoring of the threshold and other procedural aspects of the establishment of intermediate EU parent undertakings, or IPUs, as laid down in the Capital Requirements Directive.
EC published Regulation 2021/25 that addresses amendments related to the financial reporting consequences of replacement of the existing interest rate benchmarks with alternative reference rates.
BIS published a bulletin, or a note, that examines the cyber threat landscape in the context of the pandemic and discusses policies to reduce risks to financial stability.
HM Treasury, also known as HMT, has updated the table containing the list of the equivalence decisions that came into effect in UK at the end of the transition period of its withdrawal from EU.