EBA published the IFRS 9 roadmap, which provides a comprehensive overview of the planned monitoring activities on IFRS 9 implementation. EBA also launched an IFRS 9 benchmarking exercise on a sample of institutions, with the aim to analyze the modeling practices followed by institutions and how IFRS 9 implementation impacts the amount of expected credit losses (ECL) in terms of own funds and regulatory ratios.
EBA already conducted several exercises on the IFRS 9 impact on EU institutions and communicated preliminary observations on the first stages of implementation. In the roadmap, EBA clarifies its intention to continue to monitor and promote a consistent application of IFRS 9 and to work on the interaction with prudential requirements. The roadmap includes the different phases of this work from qualitative and quantitative perspectives and this work will take place in the coming months and years. While EBA has already communicated the rationale underpinning the qualitative monitoring, the purpose of this roadmap is to clarify further the next steps with regard to the quantitative monitoring. An important aspect of the quantitative monitoring is the use of selected indicators extracted from regulatory reporting.
Another major aspect of the quantitative monitoring is the benchmarking of the modeling techniques used by EU institutions for IFRS 9 purposes. The IFRS 9 benchmarking exercise represents an important step in the context of the ongoing quantitative monitoring activities. The focus of this exercise is to assess whether the use of different modeling techniques and inputs can lead to significant inconsistencies in terms of the ECL amount that directly impacts own funds and regulatory ratios. EBA will leverage on its experience and expertise on benchmarking of prudential models already gained by regulators and supervisors. During the first phase of the IFRS 9 benchmarking exercise, the objective is to collect information on modeling practices and to perform a first assessment on quantitative parameters to be reported by institutions. The sample of institutions is similar to the one used for the previous EBA reports on IFRS 9. EBA will continue to engage closely with all concerned stakeholders for the purpose of this exercise and more generally for the purpose of its monitoring work on IFRS 9 implementation.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, IFRS 9, Expected Credit Loss, ECL, Credit Risk, Roadmap, IFRS 9 Benchmarking, EBA
Previous ArticleEIOPA Publishes Q&A on Regulations in July 2019
FCA and PRA in the UK, FED in the US, and the authorities in Singapore have fined Goldman Sachs for risk management failures in connection with the 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB).
BCBS announced that OSFI and the Bank of Canada hosted the 21st International Conference of Banking Supervisors (ICBS) virtually on October 19-22, 2020.
FCA proposed guidance on how firms should continue to seek to help customers who hold insurance and premium finance products and may be in financial difficulty because of COVID-19, after October 31, 2020.
EBA issued an opinion on prudential treatment of the legacy instruments as the grandfathering period nears an end on December 31, 2021.
ESRB published the fifth issue of the EU Non-bank Financial Intermediation Risk Monitor 2020 (NBFI Monitor).
HM Treasury announced that the new Financial Services Bill has been introduced in the Parliament.
APRA announced that it has increased the minimum liquidity requirement of Bendigo and Adelaide Bank for failing to comply with the prudential standard on liquidity.
PRA published the consultation paper CP17/20 to propose changes to certain rules, supervisory statements, and statements of policy to implement elements of the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5).
US Agencies adopted a final rule that applies to advanced approaches banking organizations and aims to reduce interconnectedness in the financial system as well as to reduce contagion risks associated with the failure of a global systemically important bank (G-SIB).
US Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) adopted a final rule that implements the net stable funding ratio (NSFR) for certain large banking organizations.