CFTC is proposing amendments to its regulations that would permit derivatives clearing organizations (DCOs) organized outside of the United States (non-U.S. clearing organizations) that do not pose substantial risk to the U.S. financial system to register with CFTC, yet comply with the core principles applicable to DCOs set forth in the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) through compliance with their home country regulatory regime, subject to certain conditions and limitations. CFTC is also proposing certain related amendments to the delegation provisions in its regulations. Comments must be received by September 17, 2019.
The CEA requires a DCO to comply with the DCO core principles and any requirement that CFTC imposes by rule or regulation. The CEA further provides that, subject to any rule or regulation prescribed by CFTC, a DCO has “reasonable discretion” in establishing the manner by which DCO complies with each DCO core principle. Currently, a DCO is required to comply with all CFTC regulations that were adopted to implement the DCO core principles. CFTC is proposing regulations that would allow a non-U.S. clearing organization that seeks to clear swaps for U.S. persons, including futures commission merchants (FCM) customers, to register as a DCO and, in most instances, comply with the applicable legal requirements in its home country as an alternative means of complying with the DCO core principles. A non-U.S. clearing organization would be eligible for this alternative compliance regime if:
- CFTC determines that the clearing organization's compliance with its home country regulatory regime would satisfy the DCO core principles
- The clearing organization is in good regulatory standing in its home country
- CFTC determines that the clearing organization does not pose substantial risk to the U.S. financial system
- A memorandum of understanding or similar arrangement satisfactory to CFTC is in effect between the Commission and the clearing organization's home country regulator
An applicant for alternative compliance would be required to file only certain exhibits of Form DCO, including a regulatory compliance chart in which the applicant would identify the applicable legal requirements in its home country that correspond with each DCO core principle and explain how the applicant satisfies those requirements. Under the current registration regime, an applicant must demonstrate compliance with the DCO core principles and Part 39 of the CFTC regulations. Under the alternative compliance regime, an applicant must demonstrate that compliance with its home country requirements would satisfy the DCO core principles and compliance with those requirements. If the application is approved by CFTC, the DCO would be permitted to comply with its home country regulatory regime rather than Part 39. Because the DCO would clear swaps for customers through registered FCMs, the DCO would be required to fully comply with the customer protection requirements of CFTC as well as with the swap data reporting requirements in part 45 of the CFTC regulations. The DCO would also be held to certain ongoing and event-specific reporting requirements that are more limited in scope than the reporting requirements for existing DCOs. The proposed eligibility criteria, conditions, and reporting requirements would be set forth in proposed subpart D of Part 39.
Related Link: Federal Register Notice
Comment Due Date: September 17, 2019
Keywords: Americas, US, Banking, Securities, Derivatives Clearing Organization, DCO Core Principles, Commodity Exchange Act, Non-US Clearing Organization, CFTC
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the final policy statement PS21/21 on the leverage ratio framework in the UK. PS21/21, which sets out the final policy of both the Financial Policy Committee (FPC) and PRA
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) proposed to amend Regulation B to implement changes to the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA) under Section 1071 of the Dodd-Frank Act.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) decided to maintain, at the 2019 levels, the buffer rates for the Other Systemically Important Institutions (O-SII) for another year, with no new rates to be set until December 2023.
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a progress report on implementation of its high-level recommendations for the regulation, supervision, and oversight of global stablecoin arrangements.
In a letter to the authorized deposit taking institutions, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) announced an increase in the minimum interest rate buffer it expects banks to use when assessing the serviceability of home loan applications.
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) are consulting on the preliminary guidance that clarifies that stablecoin arrangements should observe international standards for payment, clearing, and settlement systems.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) and the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) have set out their respective work priorities for 2022.
The Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA) updated the guidelines on supervisory reporting requirements under the reporting framework 3.0, in addition to the reporting module on leverage under the common reporting (COREP) framework.
The European Commission (EC) published the Implementing Decision 2021/1753 on the equivalence of supervisory and regulatory requirements of certain third countries and territories for the purposes of the treatment of exposures, in accordance with the Capital Requirements Regulation or CRR (575/2013).
EC published the Implementing Regulation 2021/1751, which lays down implementing technical standards on uniform formats and templates for notification of determination of the impracticability of including contractual recognition of write-down and conversion powers.