ESMA published consultation paper on draft guidelines on certain aspects of the suitability requirements under the second Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID II). The finalized guidelines will replace the existing ESMA guidelines on this topic, which were issued in 2012. The draft guidelines are intended to enhance clarity and foster convergence in the implementation of certain aspects of the new MiFID II suitability requirements. ESMA will consider the feedback it receives to the consultation in Q4 2017/Q1 2018 and expects to publish a final report in Q1/Q2 2018.
The suitability requirements were introduced under MiFID to enhance investor protection by ensuring that firms that provide investment advice and portfolio management act in the clients’ best interests. The objectives of suitability assessment under MiFID II remain unchanged from the objectives under MiFID I. However, the obligations have been strengthened and specified further under the new legislative framework by including following requirements:
An explicit reference to that the use of electronic systems shall not reduce the responsibility of firms
Further details on conduct rules for firms providing a periodic assessment of the suitability
Requirement for firms performing a suitability assessment to assess, taking into account costs and complexity, whether equivalent products can meet client needs
Requirement for firms to analyze the costs and benefits of switching from one investment to another
Extension of suitability requirements to structured deposits
Requirement for firms to provide clients with a suitability report prior to the conclusion of the recommended transaction
Related Link: Consultation Paper (PDF)
Comment Due Date: October 13, 2017
Keywords: ESMA, Europe, MiFID II, Securities, Suitability Requirements, Investor Protection
Previous ArticleESMA Publishes Annual Market Share Calculation for CRAs
ESAs (EBA, EIOPA, and ESMA) published the first joint report that assesses risks in the financial sector since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic.
ECB published a decision allowing the euro area banks under its direct supervision to exclude certain central bank exposures from the leverage ratio.
ESAs launched a survey seeking feedback on the presentational aspects of product templates under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR or Regulation 2019/2088).
ECB published input of the European System of Central Banks (ESCB) into the EBA feasibility report on reducing the reporting burden for banks in EU.
EBA has decided to phase out the guidelines on legislative and non-legislative moratoria of loan repayments, in accordance with the earlier specified end of September deadline.
EC adopted a decision determining, for a limited period of time, that the regulatory framework applicable to central counterparties, or CCPs, in the UK and Northern Ireland is equivalent to the requirements laid down in the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR or Regulation 648/2012).
EBA published an Opinion addressed to EC to raise awareness about the opportunity to clarify certain issues related to the definition of credit institution in the upcoming review of the Capital Requirements Directive and Regulation (CRD and CRR).
ECB finalized the guide on assessment methodology for the internal model method for calculating exposure to counterparty credit risk (CCR) and the advanced method for own funds requirements for credit valuation adjustment (A-CVA) risk.
FED is proposing to temporarily revise the capital assessments and stress testing reports (FR Y-14A/Q/M) to implement the changes necessary to conduct stressed analysis in connection with the re-submission of capital plans, using data as of June 30, 2020.
FED adopted a proposal to extend for three years, with revision, the information collection under the market risk capital rule (FR 4201; OMB No. 7100-0314).