UK Agencies Examine Financial Stability Outlook
The Bank of England (BoE) published the financial stability report, which sets out views of the Financial Policy Committee (FPC) on stability of the financial system and details interim results of the 2021 solvency stress tests on banks. The results indicate that the banking sector remains well-capitalized and resilient. The full and final results of the 2021 solvency stress test, including bank-specific outcomes, will be published in the fourth quarter of 2021. Along with the financial stability report, BoE published a summary and record of the July 2021 meeting of FPC, which aims to identify risks to financial stability and agree on policy actions aimed at safeguarding the resilience of the UK financial system. The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) also announced that the extraordinary guardrails within which it asked bank boards to determine the appropriate level of distributions in relation to the full-year 2020 results are no longer necessary and have been removed with immediate effect.
FPC supports the decision that extraordinary guardrails on shareholder distributions are no longer necessary, consistent with the return to the standard approach of PRA to capital-setting and shareholder distributions through 2021. Furthermore, FPC expects to maintain the UK countercyclical capital buffer rate at 0% until at least December 2021. Due to the usual twelve-month implementation lag, any subsequent increase would therefore not be expected to take effect until the end of 2022 at the earliest. At the meeting, FPC identified key focus areas to reduce the likelihood and impact of disruptions to market‐based finance; these focus areas include reducing the demand from the non‐bank financial system for liquidity in stress, ensuring the resilience of the supply of liquidity in stress, and potential additional central bank liquidity backstops for market functioning. FPC also supports the international work to assess whether there was more procyclicality in margin calls than was warranted, whether market participants were prepared for margin calls in a stress, and any consequent need for policy in light of this, without compromising the benefits of the post‐global financial crisis margining reforms. For central banks to deal effectively with financial instability caused by market dysfunction, FPC supports examining whether any new tools are needed; the tools would need to be both effective and minimize any incentives for excessive risk‐taking in the future through appropriate pricing and accompanying regulatory requirements.
In another development, BoE and the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) concluded their joint review into risks in open‐ended funds and have developed a possible framework for liquidity classification and swing pricing. FPC recognizes that further work is needed to consider how these principles could be applied, and a number of operational challenges will need to be addressed before any final policy is designed and implemented. FPC emphasizes that market participants should use the most robust alternative benchmarks available in transitioning away from use of LIBOR to minimize future risks to financial stability. FPC believes that the recently created credit-sensitive rates—such as those being used in some USD markets—are not robust or suitable for widespread use as a benchmark and considers these rates to have the potential to reintroduce many of the financial stability risks associated with LIBOR. With respect to addressing risks associated wit cloud services, FPC is of the view that additional policy measures to mitigate financial stability risks in this area are needed and welcomes the engagement among BoE, FCA, and Her Majesty's Treasury on how to tackle these risks. FPC has already highlighted that the market for cloud services is highly concentrated among a few cloud service providers, which could pose risks to financial stability.
Related Links
- Financial Stability Report
- Record of FPC Meeting
- PRA Statement on Shareholder Distributions
- BoE and FCA Review of Open‐Ended Investment Funds
Keywords: Europe, UK, Banking, Securities, COVID-19, Dividend Distribution, Stress Testing, CCyB, Regulatory Capital, Credit Risk, Liquidity Risk, LIBOR, Interest Rate Benchmarks, Cloud Service Providers, Cloud Computing, Financial Stability, Benchmark Reform, Basel, PRA, FPC, FCA
Featured Experts
María Cañamero
Skilled market researcher; growth strategist; successful go-to-market campaign developer
Nicolas Degruson
Works with financial institutions, regulatory experts, business analysts, product managers, and software engineers to drive regulatory solutions across the globe.
Emil Lopez
Credit risk modeling advisor; IFRS 9 researcher; data quality and risk reporting manager
Previous Article
OCC Seeks to Renew Information Collection on Stress Testing GuidanceRelated Articles
BIS and Central Banks Experiment with GenAI to Assess Climate Risks
A recent report from the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hub details Project Gaia, a collaboration between the BIS Innovation Hub Eurosystem Center and certain central banks in Europe
Nearly 25% G-SIBs Commit to Adopting TNFD Nature-Related Disclosures
Nature-related risks are increasing in severity and frequency, affecting businesses, capital providers, financial systems, and economies.
Singapore to Mandate Climate Disclosures from FY2025
Singapore recently took a significant step toward turning climate ambition into action, with the introduction of mandatory climate-related disclosures for listed and large non-listed companies
SEC Finalizes Climate-Related Disclosures Rule
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has finalized the long-awaited rule that mandates climate-related disclosures for domestic and foreign publicly listed companies in the U.S.
EBA Proposes Standards Related to Standardized Credit Risk Approach
The European Banking Authority (EBA) has been taking significant steps toward implementing the Basel III framework and strengthening the regulatory framework for credit institutions in the EU
US Regulators Release Stress Test Scenarios for Banks
The U.S. regulators recently released baseline and severely adverse scenarios, along with other details, for stress testing the banks in 2024. The relevant U.S. banking regulators are the Federal Reserve Bank (FED), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC).
Asian Governments Aim for Interoperability in AI Governance Frameworks
The regulatory landscape for artificial intelligence (AI), including the generative kind, is evolving rapidly, with governments and regulators aiming to address the challenges and opportunities presented by this transformative technology.
EBA Proposes Operational Risk Standards Under Final Basel III Package
The European Union (EU) has been working on the final elements of Basel III standards, with endorsement of the Banking Package and the publication of the European Banking Authority (EBA) roadmap on Basel III implementation in December 2023.
EFRAG Proposes XBRL Taxonomy and Standard for Listed SMEs Under ESRS
The European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG), which plays a crucial role in shaping corporate reporting standards in European Union (EU), is seeking comments, until May 21, 2024, on the Exposure Draft ESRS for listed SMEs.
ECB to Expand Climate Change Work in 2024-2025
Banking regulators worldwide are increasingly focusing on addressing, monitoring, and supervising the institutions' exposure to climate and environmental risks.