IMF published its staff report in context of the 2019 Article IV consultation with Slovak Republic. IMF Directors noted that the banking sector is stable and well-capitalized, but profitability is under pressure and segments of vulnerability exist. Proactive macro-prudential measures have moderated credit growth and reduced credit risks of new loans. The incremental use of countercyclical capital buffers (CCyB) and supervisory capital requirements have been appropriate in ensuring adequate capital buffers for banks. Strong vigilance of smaller banks, including through reduction of non-performing loans (NPLs), is important and further increase in capital buffers may be needed, given their higher vulnerability.
The staff report highlighted that the banking sector is stable but less systemic institutions are vulnerable to economic downturns. The overall capital levels are well above the regulatory minimum while the liquidity position remains comfortable, with most banks still largely relying on deposits for funding. The overall NPL ratio has declined to a post-crisis low of 3% at the end of 2018; however, less systemic banks and building societies show higher average NPL ratios as well as lower coverage ratios. The staff analysis shows that these institutions, which constitute roughly a fifth of banking sector assets, could lose all or a large part of the capital buffers if their NPL ratios double. Profitability has been robust but faces risks from compressed lending margins. Declining risk-weight estimates in the internal models and low credit risk spreads, reflecting historically low default rates on mortgages, have resulted in significant compression of lending margins in the mortgage market—the largest in the EU.
The report also mentions that the authorities’ proactive macro-prudential policy stance is welcome and could be strengthened as follows:
- Reduce NPLs of less systemic institutions. The authorities’ initiative to require banks with high NPL ratios to develop an NPL-reduction strategy is welcome and their efforts to reduce NPLs should be sustained. To contain credit risks, building societies should be required to increase the NPL coverage ratio. The recently introduced regulatory cap on the share of long-maturity loans in new loans extended by building societies should be complemented by a cap on the share of uncollateralized loans in total loans.
- Enhance capital buffers of weaker banks. The staff supported incremental use of CCyB and supervisory (Pillar II) capital requirements to enhance resilience of banks to shocks and the authorities’ readiness to further increase CCyB. In addition, considering the uneven asset quality across banks, the authorities should strongly consider imposing non-zero Pillar II capital guidance for less systemic institutions in 2019, taking into account the supervisory stress test results.
- Better internalize mortgage credit risks. The average risk-weights in the internal models of systemic foreign bank subsidiaries in Slovakia are lower than in most other EU peers, reflecting the historically low default rates. To discourage excessive risk-taking, the authorities should strongly consider introducing a risk-weight add-on on housing loans to require banks to better internalize credit risks, which can be complemented with a floor on risk-weights on housing loans.
Given the dominance of foreign banks in the Slovak banking system, strong home-host cooperation is critical. With limited domestic capacity to absorb bail-in-able bonds, encouraging banks to have higher non-regulatory capital buffers may also help them meet minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL). To fill the gaps identified at the European level regulations by the recent euro area Financial Sector Assessment Program (FSAP), the domestic regulatory regime should require banks to obtain authorities’ pre-approval in acquiring qualifying holdings of non-bank entities and to periodically report the ultimate beneficial owners of their qualifying holdings.
Related Link: Staff Report
Keywords: Europe, Slovak Republic, Banking, Securities, Article IV, FAP, CCyB, NPLs, Macro-Prudential Policy, MREL, Credit Risk, Pillar 2, Capital Requirements, IMF
Previous ArticleOCC Proposes Innovation Pilot Program for Supervised Financial Firms
PRA published the policy statement PS8/21, which contains the final supervisory statement SS3/21 on the PRA approach to supervision of the new and growing non-systemic banks in UK.
EBA published a report that sets out the final draft regulatory technical standards specifying the conditions according to which consolidation shall be carried out in line with Article 18 of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
EBA updated the list of other systemically important institutions (O-SIIs) in EU.
BCBS published two reports that discuss transmission channels of climate-related risks to the banking system and the measurement methodologies of climate-related financial risks.
UK Authorities (FCA and PRA) welcomed the findings of FSB peer review on the implementation of financial sector remuneration reforms in the UK.
PRA and FCA jointly issued a letter that highlights risks associated with the increasing volumes of deposits that are placed with banks and building societies via deposit aggregators and how to mitigate these risks.
MFSA announced that amendments to the Banking Act, Subsidiary Legislation, and Banking Rules will be issued in the coming months, to transpose the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5) into the national regulatory framework.
EC finalized the Delegated Regulation 2021/598 that supplements the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR or 575/2013) and lays out the regulatory technical standards for assigning risk-weights to specialized lending exposures.
OSFI launched a consultation to explore ways to enhance the OSFI assurance over capital, leverage, and liquidity returns for banks and insurers, given the increasing complexity arising from the evolving regulatory reporting framework due to IFRS 17 (Insurance Contracts) standard and Basel III reforms.
ECB published results of the benchmarking analysis of the recovery plan cycle for 2019.