EIOPA launched a consultation on its advice on the harmonization of national insurance guarantee schemes across the member states of EU. The consultation paper is a draft response to the call for advice by EC on insurance guarantee schemes. The consultation period ends on October 18, 2019.
EIOPA received, on February 11, 2019, the EC call for advice on the review of Directive 2009/138/EC2 (Solvency II). The call for advice covered a broad variety of topics, including all topics that EIOPA has started to work on such as insurance guarantee schemes and macro-prudential policy in insurance. EIOPA will respond to the call for advice in the form of a Solvency II Review Opinion, which will include a holistic impact assessment. The Solvency II Review Opinion will be published for consultation in the fourth quarter of 2019. The advice in this paper will be amended with the input of this consultation process and be included in the Solvency II Review Opinion, which will be submitted to EC.
The draft advice addresses the following areas of an insurance guarantee scheme:
- Role and functioning—Insurance guarantee schemes should be set up with the primary aim to protect policyholders, such as to pay compensation swiftly to policyholders for their losses in case an insurer becomes insolvent and/or to ensure the continuation of insurance policies
- Geographical coverage—Insurance guarantee schemes should be harmonized in accordance with the home-country principle
- Eligible policies—Insurance guarantee schemes should cover a specific range of life and non-life policies, such as policies where the failure of an insurer could lead to considerable financial or social hardship for policyholders and/or in case of lines of business with a high market share in cross-border business in Europe
- Eligible claimants—Insurance guarantee schemes should cover natural persons as well as micro- and small-size legal entities
- Coverage level—Insurance guarantee schemes should have a harmonized minimum coverage level
- Funding—Insurance guarantee schemes should have adequate funding systems in place; they should, for instance, be funded on an ex-ante basis and, if needed, complemented by ex-post funding
- Disclosure—There should be requirements for adequate, clear, and comprehensive disclosure about the insurance guarantee schemes protection to consumers and policyholders
- Cross-border cooperation and coordination—Respective arrangements between national Insurance guarantee schemes should be in place
Overall, EIOPA is of the view that every member state should have a national guarantee scheme in place for the protection of policyholders in the event of a failure of an insurer, which should meet a minimum set of harmonized features. Therefore, EIOPA calls for the establishment of a European network of national insurance guarantee schemes, which are sufficiently harmonized and adequately funded. Additionally, the proportionality principle should be taken into consideration to avoid excessive burdens on insurers and member states. In this context, a flexible approach for the legal structure and setup of the schemes is important. EIOPA advises to conduct a review at least every five years, after the harmonized framework becomes effective.
Comment Due Date: October 18, 2019
Keywords: Europe, EU, Insurance, Solvency II, Insurance Guarantee Schemes, Macro-Prudential Policy, Solvency II Review, EIOPA
Previous ArticleEBA Single Rulebook Q&A: Second Update for July 2019
PRA published a set of questions and answers (Q&A) covering common queries regarding residential and commercial property valuations, for the purpose of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR), during the period of disruption caused by COVID-19 pandemic.
IOSCO proposed updates to its principles for regulated entities that outsource tasks to service providers.
MAS announced that the first phase of the Veritas initiative will commence with the development of fairness metrics in credit risk scoring and customer marketing.
BoE published the Statistical Notice 2020/4 to update the buy-to-let (BTL) Phase 2 and Phase 3 definitions for the Interest Rate Type data item.
FSI published a brief note that examines challenges facing the banking sector as a result of the payment deferral programs put in place to support borrowers affected by the COVID-19 pandemic.
PRA published the policy statement PS14/20, which contains the supervisory statement SS1/20 and the feedback to responses to the consultation paper CP22/19 on expectations for investment by firms in accordance with the Prudent Person Principle, or PPP, as set out in the Investments Part of the PRA Rulebook.
EBA published an opinion following the notification by the French macro-prudential authority, the Haut Conseil de Stabilité Financière (HCSF), of its intention to extend a measure introduced in 2018 on the use of Article 458(9) of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
As part of a Research Bulletin on the recent policy-relevant work, ECB published an article that examines the lessons learned from past crises for nonperforming loan resolution in the post COVID-19 period.
RBNZ published the financial stability report for May 2020. This review of the financial system in the country highlights that the economic disruption associated with COVID-19 will present challenges to the financial system.
ECB updated the guidance notes for reporting related to the statistics on holdings of securities by reporting banking groups (SHSG).