Featured Product

    Sam Woods of PRA on Supervision and Regulatory Artibtrage

    July 10, 2017

    PRA published remarks of Sam Woods, the Deputy Governor for Prudential Regulation and Chief Executive Officer of PRA, which were published for the May 2017 Building Society Association Annual Conference. He discussed the importance of supervision in banking and insurance sectors and examined how supervision differs from regulation. He also highlighted that “financial institutions will always be able to innovate faster than we are able to modify the prudential rulebook,” warning that some innovation is “pure regulatory arbitrage.”

    Mr. Woods explained that regulation concerns the framework of rules and legal standards that govern the way in which firms operate whereas supervision is the dynamic pursuit of the relevant authority’s statutory objectives, through oversight of firms’ activities. In his view, supervision without regulation, or vice versa, in financial services would be futile. He added that some innovation is “pure regulatory arbitrage," highlighting that firms innovate to reduce specific regulatory requirements without any commensurate reduction in their risk. He gave a few examples of such behavior that might be problematic, despite compliance with the specified rules. For instance, he mentioned that some banks are seeking out funding that matures just beyond the time horizon used to calculate regulatory liquidity requirements. Another example he gave was about how some special purpose vehicles, derivatives, agency structures, or collateral swaps carry material credit risk, which escapes the detailed aspects of the capital framework. He also exemplified that some insurance firms have sought to amend the existing contracts to extend the (Solvency II) contract boundary and recognize more future profit, as firms cannot recognize future premiums on unit-linked savings policies that do not include any insurance cover or financial guarantee of benefits. In this context, he stated that “Consistent with the PRA’s statutory duty, firms should expect questions and should be prepared to defend them according to our principles of prudence, effective risk management, and adequacy of financial resources at all times.”

     

    He observed that “The supervisory approach for banks, building societies, and insurers in the UK has meandered down different paths, at different times—and each at a different pace. Indeed, even when regulation has been laid down in statute, each supervisory agency has taken time to develop and embed its own approach.” PRA supervisors also pay close attention to the emerging trends and potential future risks and supervisors will continue to keep a close eye on the effects of issues on the viability of business models and future strategy for building societies. Finally, he reinforced “that supervision—as distinct from regulation—is vital if we are to ensure that the framework of regulation operates effectively and as intended. Supervisors have an important job to do—defending the reforms put in place following the most recent crisis.”

     

    Related Link: Speech (PDF)

    Keywords: Europe, United Kingdom, PRA, Supervision, Banking, Insurance, Regulatory Arbitrage

    Related Articles
    News

    EIOPA Forms Consultative Expert Group on Digital Ethics in Insurance

    EIOPA established the Consultative Expert Group on Digital Ethics in Insurance to assist EIOPA in the development of digital responsibility principles in insurance.

    September 17, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FASB Proposes Taxonomy Changes Related to Topics 848 and 470

    FASB proposed taxonomy improvements for the proposed Accounting Standards Update on topic 848 on facilitation of effects of reference rate reform on financial reporting.

    September 16, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BoE Statement on Recalculating Transitional Measures Under Solvency II

    BoE notified that it will be willing to accept applications from firms to recalculate transitional measure on technical provisions (TMTP) as at September 30, 2019.

    September 16, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BIS Hosts Conference to Discuss Issues from Emergence of Stablecoins

    BIS hosted a conference in Basel to discuss policy and regulatory issues posed by the emergence of stablecoin initiatives backed by financial institutions and large technology companies.

    September 16, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BIS Paper on Embedded Supervision of Blockchain-Based Financial Market

    BIS published a working paper that investigates ways to regulate and supervise blockchain-based financial markets.

    September 16, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BoE Paper on Market-Implied Systemic Risk and Shadow Capital Adequacy

    BoE published a working paper that presents a forward-looking approach to measure systemic solvency risk.

    September 13, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    HKMA Consults on Policy Module on Pillar 2 Supervisory Review Process

    HKMA is consulting on the revised Supervisory Policy Manual module CA-G-5 that sets out the HKMA approach to conducting the supervisory review process under Pillar 2.

    September 13, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    PRA Publishes Waiver by Consent of Continuity of Access Rules

    PRA published a new waiver by consent to waive the Continuity of Access requirements contained in the Depositor Protection Part of the PRA Rulebook (DPP).

    September 13, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Single Rulebook Q&A: Second Update for September 2019

    EBA updated the Single Rulebook question and answer (Q&A) tool with answers to three questions.

    September 13, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BoE Publishes Update on Meeting of Working Group on Risk-Free Rates

    BoE published the minutes of the July meeting of working group on sterling risk-free reference rates.

    September 13, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 3827