IAIS published a report on supervisory issues associated with benchmark transition from an insurance perspective. The report shares findings and recommendations from a survey conducted among IAIS members. The report highlights that continued reliance of financial markets on LIBOR poses clear risks to global financial stability. Transition away from LIBOR by the end of 2021 requires significant commitment and sustained effort from both financial and non-financial institutions across many jurisdictions. IAIS encourages insurance supervisors to strengthen their efforts in facilitating the insurers’ transition away from LIBOR.
The key findings and recommendations identified from the survey responses are largely consistent with those of the FSB-BCBS report on supervisory issues associated with benchmark transition, albeit with a few points specific to the insurance sector. The issues that are specific to the insurance sector arise because insurers are exposed to transition risks on both sides of the balance sheet. The survey results highlight that, overall, insurer exposures to LIBOR are limited, but might be more concentrated in certain insurers, depending on their geographical location, balance sheet structure, business model, products, and size. Approximately half of the responding jurisdictions indicated that there is no material exposure to LIBOR in their insurance markets and hence did not report to have a transition strategy in place. Other jurisdictions are still in the process of executing a work plan to analyze the LIBOR exposures.
From a micro-prudential perspective, similar to the findings from the FSB-BCBS survey, transition risks may arise from the operational, legal, prudential, conduct, hedging, and accounting perspectives. Similar to non-insurance supervisors, most insurance supervisors have not set targets and deadlines for insurers to transition from LIBOR to alternative reference rates. Authorities in LIBOR currency jurisdictions are relatively more advanced in taking initiatives to facilitate and monitor benchmark transition. Similar to the FSB-BCBS survey, based on the responses received, IAIS has identified a number of recommendations adopted by authorities to address LIBOR transition challenges. Some of these recommendations have been already adopted by authorities that have progressed more toward LIBOR transition. A wider implementation of these recommendations by jurisdictions could facilitate a more effective and coordinated transition globally. The report includes three sets of recommendations:
- Identification of LIBOR exposures and transition challenges—Insurance supervisors are recommended to closely monitor LIBOR transition and actively reach out to the sector based on a risk-based approach. Insurance supervisors should issue public statements to promote awareness of LIBOR cessation and associated risks. Supervisory authorities should evaluate the need and then undertake regular surveys to monitor financial institutions’ (including insurers) exposure to LIBOR and to identify possible areas of risk concentration. Insurance supervisors are recommended to request, as part of the insurer risk management and reporting, a board-level summary of key risks and action plans related to LIBOR transition, steps already taken, and designated senior management responsible for transition.
- Transition facilitation—Insurance supervisors should maintain regular dialog with insurers to discuss the transition plans, the progress against set timelines or milestones, and the readiness of internal and external systems. Insurance supervisors should provide further regulatory clarifications or supervisory guidance to facilitate the transition.
- Supervisory cooperation and coordination—Insurance supervisors are recommended to promote financial sector-wide coordination, maintain dialog on the adoption of fallback language, consider working with relevant financial sector supervisors to identify legislative solutions where necessary, and exchange information on best practices and challenges as well as on progress across jurisdictions. International bodies, standard-setting bodies, and supervisory authorities encourage financial institutions, including insurers, to maintain a good understanding of wider market developments.
IAIS and its members are committed to supporting the next steps proposed by BCBS and FSB in further assessing transition progress and monitoring the evolving impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on benchmark transition.
Keywords: International, Insurance, Securities, Interest Rate Benchmark, LIBOR, Risk-Free Rates, IBOR Transition, OTC Derivatives, BCBS, FSB, IAIS
PRA published the policy statement PS8/21, which contains the final supervisory statement SS3/21 on the PRA approach to supervision of the new and growing non-systemic banks in UK.
EBA published a report that sets out the final draft regulatory technical standards specifying the conditions according to which consolidation shall be carried out in line with Article 18 of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
EBA updated the list of other systemically important institutions (O-SIIs) in EU.
BCBS published two reports that discuss transmission channels of climate-related risks to the banking system and the measurement methodologies of climate-related financial risks.
UK Authorities (FCA and PRA) welcomed the findings of FSB peer review on the implementation of financial sector remuneration reforms in the UK.
PRA and FCA jointly issued a letter that highlights risks associated with the increasing volumes of deposits that are placed with banks and building societies via deposit aggregators and how to mitigate these risks.
MFSA announced that amendments to the Banking Act, Subsidiary Legislation, and Banking Rules will be issued in the coming months, to transpose the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5) into the national regulatory framework.
EC finalized the Delegated Regulation 2021/598 that supplements the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR or 575/2013) and lays out the regulatory technical standards for assigning risk-weights to specialized lending exposures.
OSFI launched a consultation to explore ways to enhance the OSFI assurance over capital, leverage, and liquidity returns for banks and insurers, given the increasing complexity arising from the evolving regulatory reporting framework due to IFRS 17 (Insurance Contracts) standard and Basel III reforms.
ECB published results of the benchmarking analysis of the recovery plan cycle for 2019.