APRA updated the regulatory approach for loans subject to repayment deferrals amid the COVID-19 crisis. It announced an extension of its temporary capital treatment for bank loans with repayment deferrals and temporarily adjusted the capital treatment of loans where terms are modified or renegotiated. APRA also published a letter to the authorized deposit-taking institutions providing an update on the regulatory approach to loans subject to repayment deferrals. The letter advises institutions that this regulatory approach will be extended to cover a maximum period of 10 months from the start of a repayment deferral, or until March 31, 2021, whichever comes first. Additionally, APRA published aggregated data from the 20 largest deposit-taking institutions in Australia to provide more transparency on temporary loan repayment deferrals. APRA will continue to update this information on a monthly basis.
Where an authorized deposit-taking institution restructures an affected borrower’s facilities before March 31, 2021 with a view to putting the borrower on a sustainable financial footing, the loan may continue to be regarded as a performing loan for capital and regulatory reporting purposes. For new loan repayment deferrals that authorized deposit-taking institutions provide for the first time after September 30, 2020, the temporary capital treatment may be applied until March 31, 2021. While authorized deposit-taking institutions are free to choose to extend repayment deferrals beyond these dates, they may not apply the temporary capital treatment after these dates. For repayment deferrals offered after September 30, 2020 (including extensions to existing deferral arrangements), the temporary capital treatment may only be applied where the authorized deposit-taking institution has undertaken an appropriate credit assessment of the borrower and is satisfied that the borrower has a reasonable prospect of being able to repay the loan (on original or restructured terms) when the repayment deferral period ends.
APRA expects authorized deposit-taking institutions to have a comprehensive plan that demonstrates how they will systematically work through the large volume of impacted customers and avoid operational constraints as deferral periods come to an end. This plan should be approved by the relevant Accountable Person and provided to APRA and the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) by the end of August 2020. To maintain transparency, APRA will also require authorized deposit-taking institutions to provide regular disclosures on the status of their deferred, restructured, and impaired loan portfolios. APRA also plans to develop additional reporting obligations in relation to these exposures, to monitor their volume and performance. Meanwhile, the Financial Instruments expected loss provisioning under AASB 9 continues to apply to authorized deposit-taking institutions, including for loans with repayment deferrals and restructured loans. Authorized deposit-taking institutions should continue to monitor borrowers closely and undertake regular credit risk assessments and should on a best endeavor basis continue to grade and re-rate borrowers through the period ahead.
- News on Updated Regulatory Approach
- News on Letter and Data Publication
- Letter on Treatment of Loans
- Data on Temporary Loan Deferrals
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Australia, Banking, COVID-19, Loan Moratorium, Credit Risk, Regulatory Capital, Basel, Reporting, Disclosures, AASB 9, ECL, APRA
Previous ArticleACPR Seeks Views on Governance of Artificial Intelligence in Finance
ESAs published the final draft implementing technical standards on reporting of intra-group transactions and risk concentration of financial conglomerates subject to the supplementary supervision in EU.
EBA published the annual report on asset encumbrance of banks in EU.
FED updated the reporting form and instructions for the FR Y-9C report on consolidated financial statements for holding companies.
EBA issued a consultation paper on the guidelines on monitoring of the threshold and other procedural aspects of the establishment of intermediate EU parent undertakings, or IPUs, as laid down in the Capital Requirements Directive.
EC published Regulation 2021/25 that addresses amendments related to the financial reporting consequences of replacement of the existing interest rate benchmarks with alternative reference rates.
BIS published a bulletin, or a note, that examines the cyber threat landscape in the context of the pandemic and discusses policies to reduce risks to financial stability.
HM Treasury, also known as HMT, has updated the table containing the list of the equivalence decisions that came into effect in UK at the end of the transition period of its withdrawal from EU.
EBA published an erratum for technical package on phase 1 of the reporting framework 3.0.
APRA updated a frequently asked question (FAQ), for authorized deposit-taking institutions, on the measurement of credit risk weighted assets.
ECB published a letter from Andrea Enria, the Chair of the Supervisory Board of ECB, answering questions raised by the President of the Bundestag (the German federal parliament) on how ECB assesses the financial stability of the euro area in the context of the significant level of nonperforming loans.