HKMA decided to maintain the countercyclical capital buffer (CCyB) for banks in Hong Kong at 2.5%, in accordance with the Banking (Capital) Rules (BCR). A review of the indicators of robustness of the system showed that system-wide risks in Hong Kong that are associated with a period of excessive credit growth have not subsided. Housing affordability remains highly stretched and household debt-to-GDP ratio has risen to a new high. Therefore, it is considered appropriate to maintain the CCyB at 2.5% at this juncture, providing additional buffer to shock should systemic risks crystallize.
In reaching the decision to maintain the Hong Kong jurisdictional CCyB rate at 2.5%, HKMA reviewed a range of quantitative indicators and qualitative information. This included the “indicative buffer guide” produced by HKMA’s Initial Reference Calculator (IRC), which is a metric that takes into account conditions in local credit and property markets. By mapping deviations (gaps) of the ratios of credit to GDP and of residential property prices to rentals from their respective long-term trends to the Basel III CCyB range of 0% to 2.5%, the IRC produces a consistent starting point for further analysis. In considering whether there is a build-up of systemic risk, HKMA considers a broad range of information, in addition to the indicative buffer guide produced by the IRC. HKMA also reviewed a series of “Comprehensive Reference Indicators” designed to provide an aggregate view of local conditions, including the build-up of systemic risk (such as measures of bank, household, and corporate leverage; profitability and funding conditions in the banking sector; borrowers’ debt servicing ability; and macroeconomic indicators).
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Hong Kong, Banking, CCyB, Basel III, Banking Capital Rules, Systemic Risk, Macro-Prudential Policy, HKMA
Previous ArticleEBA Reports on Progress on Roadmap to Repair Internal Models
PRA published a set of questions and answers (Q&A) covering common queries regarding residential and commercial property valuations, for the purpose of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR), during the period of disruption caused by COVID-19 pandemic.
IOSCO proposed updates to its principles for regulated entities that outsource tasks to service providers.
MAS announced that the first phase of the Veritas initiative will commence with the development of fairness metrics in credit risk scoring and customer marketing.
BoE published the Statistical Notice 2020/4 to update the buy-to-let (BTL) Phase 2 and Phase 3 definitions for the Interest Rate Type data item.
FSI published a brief note that examines challenges facing the banking sector as a result of the payment deferral programs put in place to support borrowers affected by the COVID-19 pandemic.
PRA published the policy statement PS14/20, which contains the supervisory statement SS1/20 and the feedback to responses to the consultation paper CP22/19 on expectations for investment by firms in accordance with the Prudent Person Principle, or PPP, as set out in the Investments Part of the PRA Rulebook.
EBA published an opinion following the notification by the French macro-prudential authority, the Haut Conseil de Stabilité Financière (HCSF), of its intention to extend a measure introduced in 2018 on the use of Article 458(9) of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
As part of a Research Bulletin on the recent policy-relevant work, ECB published an article that examines the lessons learned from past crises for nonperforming loan resolution in the post COVID-19 period.
RBNZ published the financial stability report for May 2020. This review of the financial system in the country highlights that the economic disruption associated with COVID-19 will present challenges to the financial system.
ECB updated the guidance notes for reporting related to the statistics on holdings of securities by reporting banking groups (SHSG).