HKMA decided to maintain the countercyclical capital buffer (CCyB) for banks in Hong Kong at 2.5%, in accordance with the Banking (Capital) Rules (BCR). A review of the indicators of robustness of the system showed that system-wide risks in Hong Kong that are associated with a period of excessive credit growth have not subsided. Housing affordability remains highly stretched and household debt-to-GDP ratio has risen to a new high. Therefore, it is considered appropriate to maintain the CCyB at 2.5% at this juncture, providing additional buffer to shock should systemic risks crystallize.
In reaching the decision to maintain the Hong Kong jurisdictional CCyB rate at 2.5%, HKMA reviewed a range of quantitative indicators and qualitative information. This included the “indicative buffer guide” produced by HKMA’s Initial Reference Calculator (IRC), which is a metric that takes into account conditions in local credit and property markets. By mapping deviations (gaps) of the ratios of credit to GDP and of residential property prices to rentals from their respective long-term trends to the Basel III CCyB range of 0% to 2.5%, the IRC produces a consistent starting point for further analysis. In considering whether there is a build-up of systemic risk, HKMA considers a broad range of information, in addition to the indicative buffer guide produced by the IRC. HKMA also reviewed a series of “Comprehensive Reference Indicators” designed to provide an aggregate view of local conditions, including the build-up of systemic risk (such as measures of bank, household, and corporate leverage; profitability and funding conditions in the banking sector; borrowers’ debt servicing ability; and macroeconomic indicators).
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Hong Kong, Banking, CCyB, Basel III, Banking Capital Rules, Systemic Risk, Macro-Prudential Policy, HKMA
Previous ArticleEBA Reports on Progress on Roadmap to Repair Internal Models
EC published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, a notification that the European Court of Auditors (ECA) has published a special report on resolution planning in the Single Resolution Mechanism.
BoE published a scenario against which it will be stress testing banks in 2021, in addition to setting out the key elements of the 2021 stress test, guidance on the 2021 stress test, and the variable paths for the 2021 stress test.
PRA published a consultation paper (CP3/21) proposes rules regarding the timing of identity verification required for eligibility of depositor protection under the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS).
FSB published the work program for 2021, which reflects a strategic shift in priorities in the COVID-19 environment.
FED finalized a rule that updates capital planning requirements to reflect the new framework from 2019 that sorts large banks into categories, with requirements that are tailored to the risks of each category.
ECB published results of the quarterly lending survey conducted on 143 banks in the euro area.
Bundesbank published Version 5.0 of the derivation rules for completeness check at the form level, with respect to the data quality of the European harmonized reporting system.
ESAs published the final draft implementing technical standards on reporting of intra-group transactions and risk concentration of financial conglomerates subject to the supplementary supervision in EU.
EBA published the annual report on asset encumbrance of banks in EU.
FCA proposed two sets of guidance on the approaches to mortgage repossessions and consumer credit repossessions, with comment period ending on January 18, 2021.