The Division of Swap Dealer and Intermediary Oversight (DSIO) at CFTC issued an Advisory clarifying that the uncleared swap margin rules of CFTC do not require documentation governing the posting, collection, and custody of initial margin until the initial margin threshold amount exceeds USD 50 million. This Advisory, which applies only to the covered swap entities, follows the March 2019 statement by BCBS and IOSCO concerning implementation of initial margin.
The DSIO Director Matthew Kulkin said, “The documentation requirements may impose a heavy burden on Phase 5 entities coming into scope in September 2020, and we believe the CFTC staff clarification is appropriate in light of the BCBS-IOSCO March 2019 statement.” The Advisory also clarifies that while no specific initial margin documentation is required prior to reaching the USD 50 million threshold, DSIO expects that CFTC-regulated swap dealers will have appropriate risk management systems in place to calculate and monitor initial margin amounts and will act diligently as the amounts approach the USD 50 million threshold to ensure compliance with the documentation requirements. The CFTC Margin Rule does not require counterparties to the covered swap entities, other than other the covered swap entities, to establish custodial services, document margin relationships, or operationalize the exchange of initial margin. Therefore, this advisory is not applicable to non-swap-dealer counterparties and does not address any obligation of such counterparties or suggest any such obligations.
Keywords: Americas, US, Banking, Securities, Swaps, Swap Dealers, Initial Margin, Phase 5 Entities, Margin Requirements, CFTC
Previous ArticleAPRA Decides to Increase Loss-Absorbing Capacity of D-SIBs
PRA published the policy statement PS14/20, which contains the supervisory statement SS1/20 and the feedback to responses to the consultation paper CP22/19 on expectations for investment by firms in accordance with the Prudent Person Principle, or PPP, as set out in the Investments Part of the PRA Rulebook.
EBA published an opinion following the notification by the French macro-prudential authority, the Haut Conseil de Stabilité Financière (HCSF), of its intention to extend a measure introduced in 2018 on the use of Article 458(9) of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
As part of a Research Bulletin on the recent policy-relevant work, ECB published an article that examines the lessons learned from past crises for nonperforming loan resolution in the post COVID-19 period.
RBNZ published the financial stability report for May 2020. This review of the financial system in the country highlights that the economic disruption associated with COVID-19 will present challenges to the financial system.
ECB updated the guidance notes for reporting related to the statistics on holdings of securities by reporting banking groups (SHSG).
ECB published results of the financial stability review in May 2020. Among other issues, the financial stability review assesses operations of the financial system so far during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Financial policymakers and international standard-setters met virtually with private-sector executives to discuss international policy responses to COVID-19 pandemic.
ESMA published a letter responding to IASB on the exposure draft on the phase 2 of the interest rate benchmark reform.
HKMA is consulting on revisions to the Supervisory Policy Manual module CR-G-14 on margin and other risk mitigation standards for non-centrally cleared over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives transactions.
EBA published thematic note presenting a preliminary assessment of the impact of COVID-19 outbreak on the banking sector in EU.