The Division of Swap Dealer and Intermediary Oversight (DSIO) at CFTC issued an Advisory clarifying that the uncleared swap margin rules of CFTC do not require documentation governing the posting, collection, and custody of initial margin until the initial margin threshold amount exceeds USD 50 million. This Advisory, which applies only to the covered swap entities, follows the March 2019 statement by BCBS and IOSCO concerning implementation of initial margin.
The DSIO Director Matthew Kulkin said, “The documentation requirements may impose a heavy burden on Phase 5 entities coming into scope in September 2020, and we believe the CFTC staff clarification is appropriate in light of the BCBS-IOSCO March 2019 statement.” The Advisory also clarifies that while no specific initial margin documentation is required prior to reaching the USD 50 million threshold, DSIO expects that CFTC-regulated swap dealers will have appropriate risk management systems in place to calculate and monitor initial margin amounts and will act diligently as the amounts approach the USD 50 million threshold to ensure compliance with the documentation requirements. The CFTC Margin Rule does not require counterparties to the covered swap entities, other than other the covered swap entities, to establish custodial services, document margin relationships, or operationalize the exchange of initial margin. Therefore, this advisory is not applicable to non-swap-dealer counterparties and does not address any obligation of such counterparties or suggest any such obligations.
Keywords: Americas, US, Banking, Securities, Swaps, Swap Dealers, Initial Margin, Phase 5 Entities, Margin Requirements, CFTC
Previous ArticleIMF Publishes Report Under 2019 Article IV Consultation with China
In a recent Market Notice, the Bank of England (BoE) confirmed that green gilts will have equivalent eligibility to existing gilts in its market operations.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published the policy statement PS21/9 on implementation of the Investment Firms Prudential Regime.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) proposed regulatory technical standards that set out criteria for identifying shadow banking entities for the purpose of reporting large exposures.
The Board of the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) proposed a set of recommendations on the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) ratings and data providers.
The European Commission (EC) announced plans to defer the application of 13 regulatory technical standards under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (2019/2088) by six months, from January 01, 2022 to July 01, 2022.
The Bank of England (BoE) published a consultation paper on approach to setting minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL), an operational guide on executing bail-in, and a statement from the Deputy Governor Dave Ramsden.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) is seeking preliminary input on standardization of the proportionality assessment methodology for credit institutions and investment firms.
Certain regulatory authorities in the US are extending period for completion of the review of certain residential mortgage provisions and for publication of notice disclosing the determination of this review until December 20, 2021.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the policy statement PS18/21, which introduces an amendment in the definition of "higher paid material risk taker" in the Remuneration Part of the PRA Rulebook.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published its annual report on asset encumbrance in banking sector.