EIOPA issued a statement that clarifies supervisory expectations on product oversight and governance requirements amid the COVID-19 situation. To ensure the continuing fair treatment of customers in light of COVID-19 crisis, insurance manufacturers are being asked to identify the products affected as a result of COVID-19 crisis, assess possible unfair treatment of customers for these products, and consider proportionate remedial measures. This statement builds on the statement issued, on April 01, 2020, to insurers and intermediaries to take steps to mitigate the impact of COVID-19 crisis on consumers.
EIOPA expects insurance manufacturers to identify insurance products whose main features, risk coverage, or guarantees have been materially impacted by the COVID-19 situation. Where products have been materially affected, insurance manufacturers should assess whether and how they continue to offer value to the target market, taking into account the needs, characteristics, and objectives. The assessment should be on a medium to longer term basis, to take into account product lifecycles and the evolution of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. When manufacturers identify products that are no longer sufficiently aligned with the target market, they should assess whether this can result in possible unfair treatment. This should be an assessment for the target market in general, rather than for individual customers.
EIOPA expects measures to be taken where possible unfair treatment emerges, also taking into account the relevant legal requirements in national civil and insurance law. These measures should be proportional to the potential unfair treatment and reflect possible extended changes in product utility. In line with product oversight and governance requirements, remedial measures should aim to mitigate the situation and prevent further occurrences of the detriment. Insurance manufacturers should consider a broad range of possible measures and their impact on products over the medium to long term. EIOPA and national supervisory authorities will continue working collectively to ensure financial stability, market integrity, and consumer protection, including by continuing monitoring the market practices in light of the COVID-19 situation.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Insurance, COVID-19, Governance, Product Oversight and Governance, Proportionality, EIOPA
Leading economist; commercial real estate; performance forecasting, econometric infrastructure; data modeling; credit risk modeling; portfolio assessment; custom commercial real estate analysis; thought leader.
Previous ArticleCNB Relaxes Mortgage Limits, Reduces Capital Buffer
FCA and PRA in the UK, FED in the US, and the authorities in Singapore have fined Goldman Sachs for risk management failures in connection with the 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB).
BCBS announced that OSFI and the Bank of Canada hosted the 21st International Conference of Banking Supervisors (ICBS) virtually on October 19-22, 2020.
FCA proposed guidance on how firms should continue to seek to help customers who hold insurance and premium finance products and may be in financial difficulty because of COVID-19, after October 31, 2020.
EBA issued an opinion on prudential treatment of the legacy instruments as the grandfathering period nears an end on December 31, 2021.
ESRB published the fifth issue of the EU Non-bank Financial Intermediation Risk Monitor 2020 (NBFI Monitor).
HM Treasury announced that the new Financial Services Bill has been introduced in the Parliament.
APRA announced that it has increased the minimum liquidity requirement of Bendigo and Adelaide Bank for failing to comply with the prudential standard on liquidity.
PRA published the consultation paper CP17/20 to propose changes to certain rules, supervisory statements, and statements of policy to implement elements of the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5).
US Agencies adopted a final rule that applies to advanced approaches banking organizations and aims to reduce interconnectedness in the financial system as well as to reduce contagion risks associated with the failure of a global systemically important bank (G-SIB).
US Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) adopted a final rule that implements the net stable funding ratio (NSFR) for certain large banking organizations.