General Information & Client Services
  • Americas: +1.212.553.1653
  • Asia: +852.3551.3077
  • China: +86.10.6319.6580
  • EMEA: +44.20.7772.5454
  • Japan: +81.3.5408.4100
Media Relations
  • New York: +1.212.553.0376
  • London: +44.20.7772.5456
  • Hong Kong: +852.3758.1350
  • Tokyo: +813.5408.4110
  • Sydney: +61.2.9270.8141
  • Mexico City: +001.888.779.5833
  • Buenos Aires: +0800.666.3506
  • São Paulo: +0800.891.2518
July 04, 2017

ECB published an interview with Sabine Lautenschläger, Member of the Executive Board of the ECB and Vice-Chair of the Supervisory Board of the ECB. This interview was conducted by Claire Jones and Caroline Binham of the Financial Times. She spoke about Brexit in the context of the Single Supervisory Mechanism’s (SSM) expectations for UK institutions looking to establish a base in the eurozone. Challenges regarding supervision of subsidiaries and third-country branches, in the light of Brexit, represented another key area of discussion.

During the interview, Ms. Lautenschläger elaborated on the issue of third-country branches versus subsidiaries, in terms of understanding the difference. She highlighted that how supervision is done can be different, “depending on where you would establish a third-country branch” and it is not harmonized. European rules on establishing a subsidiary are very clear and until now the UK has followed and complied with them. According to Ms. Lautenschläger “… you have your capital requirements and you have your liquidity standards. It’s very clear that the supervisory approach in the euro area for subsidiaries is the same. When a subsidiary is a significant one, it is supervised by us according to our standards; when the subsidiary is less significant it is supervised by the national competent authorities (NCAs), but according to our standards. We have a joint supervisory approach. If it is a third-country branch or if it is an investment firm, it’s under national supervision and under a national regime with regard to capital or liquidity, and you might have countries where you have similar or even the same capital or liquidity demands and, in other countries, it is quite different from a subsidiary.”


The rules around the third-country branches are different because of the national regimes. She thinks that this loophole regarding branches needs to be addressed, “... especially when we are talking about systemic third-country branches... . There are third-country branches under a national regime, which might be very relevant. Then there are subsidiaries of investment firms that can do everything except deposit-taking under a national regime too. And then you have different intragroup exposure rules in the different countries, which are very important too. When you try to book activities in different entities of one structure in the euro area, it might be relevant what kind of intragroup rules and limits you have—these are partly national, partly harmonized.” She also mentioned that the U.S., Switzerland, the UK, and Japan currently have third-country branches in Europe and these are “the most important.”


Related Link: Interview of Sabine Lautenschläger

Keywords: Europe, ECB, Banking, Brexit, Third-Country Branches, Banking Supervision, SSM

Related Insights

IAIS Publishes Drafts of Revised ICP 8, ICP 15, ICP 16, and ICP 20

IAIS published the drafts of revised Insurance Core Principles on Public Disclosure (ICP 20), Investments (ICP 15), Enterprise Risk Management for Solvency Purposes (ICP 16), and Risk Management and Internal Controls (ICP 8), along with a revised draft of the glossary on enterprise risk management (ERM).

November 14, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News

MAS Amends Notice 637 on Capital Adequacy Requirements in Singapore

MAS published the final, revised Notice 637 on the risk-based capital adequacy requirements in Singapore.

November 13, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News

ESMA Updates Q&A on Implementation of CSD Regulation and MAR

ESMA updated questions and answers (Q&A) documents on the implementation of the Central Securities Depository (CSD) Regulation and Market Abuse Regulation (MAR).

November 12, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News

FSB Finalizes and Publishes the Cyber Lexicon

FSB published a cyber lexicon, following the public consultation earlier this year.

November 12, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News

SRB Updates Liability Data Reporting Template for 2019

SRB published version 2.7.1 of the Liability Data Reporting (LDR) Template.

November 12, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News

ECB to Conduct Comprehensive Assessment of Six Bulgarian Banks

ECB will undertake a comprehensive assessment of six Bulgarian banks. The exercise, comprising an asset quality review and a stress test, follows Bulgaria’s submission of a request to establish close cooperation with ECB on July 18, 2018.

November 12, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News

IMF Publishes Reports on the 2018 Article IV Consultation with Chile

IMF published its staff report and selected issues report under the 2018 Article IV consultation with Chile.

November 09, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News

PRA Issues PS27/18 on Implementing the Extension of SM&CR to Insurers

PRA published the policy statement PS27/18, which provides feedback to responses to the consultation paper CP20/18, on implementing the extension of the Senior Managers and Certification Regime (SM&CR) to insurers (Part 2).

November 09, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News

EBA Single Rulebook Q&A: First Update for November 2018

EBA published answers to seven questions under the Single Rulebook question and answer (Q&A) updates for this week.

November 09, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News

FED Finalizes the Large Financial Institution Rating System

FED finalized the new supervisory rating system for Large Financial Institutions (LFIs), to better align with the current supervisory programs and practices for these firms.

November 09, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News
RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 2204