Featured Product

    Sabine Lautenschläger of ECB on Addressing the Brexit Challenges

    July 04, 2017

    ECB published an interview with Sabine Lautenschläger, Member of the Executive Board of the ECB and Vice-Chair of the Supervisory Board of the ECB. This interview was conducted by Claire Jones and Caroline Binham of the Financial Times. She spoke about Brexit in the context of the Single Supervisory Mechanism’s (SSM) expectations for UK institutions looking to establish a base in the eurozone. Challenges regarding supervision of subsidiaries and third-country branches, in the light of Brexit, represented another key area of discussion.

    During the interview, Ms. Lautenschläger elaborated on the issue of third-country branches versus subsidiaries, in terms of understanding the difference. She highlighted that how supervision is done can be different, “depending on where you would establish a third-country branch” and it is not harmonized. European rules on establishing a subsidiary are very clear and until now the UK has followed and complied with them. According to Ms. Lautenschläger “… you have your capital requirements and you have your liquidity standards. It’s very clear that the supervisory approach in the euro area for subsidiaries is the same. When a subsidiary is a significant one, it is supervised by us according to our standards; when the subsidiary is less significant it is supervised by the national competent authorities (NCAs), but according to our standards. We have a joint supervisory approach. If it is a third-country branch or if it is an investment firm, it’s under national supervision and under a national regime with regard to capital or liquidity, and you might have countries where you have similar or even the same capital or liquidity demands and, in other countries, it is quite different from a subsidiary.”

     

    The rules around the third-country branches are different because of the national regimes. She thinks that this loophole regarding branches needs to be addressed, “... especially when we are talking about systemic third-country branches... . There are third-country branches under a national regime, which might be very relevant. Then there are subsidiaries of investment firms that can do everything except deposit-taking under a national regime too. And then you have different intragroup exposure rules in the different countries, which are very important too. When you try to book activities in different entities of one structure in the euro area, it might be relevant what kind of intragroup rules and limits you have—these are partly national, partly harmonized.” She also mentioned that the U.S., Switzerland, the UK, and Japan currently have third-country branches in Europe and these are “the most important.”

     

    Related Link: Interview of Sabine Lautenschläger

    Keywords: Europe, ECB, Banking, Brexit, Third-Country Branches, Banking Supervision, SSM

    Related Articles
    News

    FSB Examines Financial Stability Aspects of Bigtech and Cloud Services

    FSB published two reports that consider the financial stability implications from the offering of financial services by bigtech firms and the adoption of cloud computing and data services across a range of functions at financial institutions.

    December 09, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    APRA Specifies Capital Treatment of Equity Investments in ABGF

    APRA published a letter to the authorized deposit-taking institutions outlining the regulatory capital treatment of their equity investments in the Australian Business Growth Fund (ABGF).

    December 09, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BoE Updates XBRL Filing Manual for Reporting Under Solvency II

    BoE has updated the XBRL filing manual (to Version 5.0) to help firms and software vendors create XBRL instance documents for Solvency II Pillar 3 and BoE Insurance reporting.

    December 09, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    HKMA Proposes Changes to Module on Supervision of Concentration Risk

    HKMA issued a circular proposing revisions to the Supervisory Policy Manual module CR-L-1 on consolidated supervision of concentration risks under the Banking (Exposure Limits) Rules (BELR) Rule 6.

    December 09, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Publishes Action Plan on Sustainable Finance

    EBA published the Action Plan on sustainable finance for banks.

    December 06, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Single Rulebook Q&A: Second Update for December 2019

    EBA updated the Single Rulebook question and answer (Q&A) tool with answers to three questions under the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) and the second Payment Services Directive (PSD 2).

    December 06, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    APRA Publishes Proposal to Increase Transparency of Banking Data

    APRA proposed to substantially increase the volume and breadth of data it makes publicly available on authorized deposit-taking institutions, including banks, credit unions, and building societies.

    December 05, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ESMA Consults on Guide to Internal Controls for Credit Rating Agencies

    ESMA launched a consultation on the guidelines on internal controls for credit rating agencies (CRAs).

    December 05, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EU Finalizes Directive and Prudential Rules for Investment Firms

    EU published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, the Directive (2019/2034) and Regulation (2019/2033) on the prudential requirements and supervision of investment firms.

    December 05, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    OSFI Revises Guideline on Principles for Management of Liquidity Risk

    OSFI finalized Guideline B-6 on the principles for the management of liquidity risk.

    December 05, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 4292