APRA issued a letter setting out its expectations on the regulatory treatment of AASB 9 expected credit loss (ECL) provisions and possible transition arrangements. All authorized deposit-taking institutions are required to apply AASB 9 Financial Instruments (AASB 9) for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 01, 2018.
BCBS had recently finalized an interim provisioning approach that retains the current regulatory treatment of accounting for ECL provisions. BCBS recommended that regulatory authorities should provide guidance, as appropriate, on how they intend to categorize ECL provisions as General Provisions or Specific Provisions in their jurisdiction. When applying the Prudential Standard APS 220 Credit Quality (APS 220) requirements (paragraphs 39, 42, 43, 46–49), APRA expects authorized deposit-taking institutions to adopt the following approach to the three AASB 9 provisioning stages:
Stage 1 (representing 12-month ECL provisions on performing loans)—Allocate to General Reserve for Credit Losses (GRCL), if held against future, presently unidentified losses and, therefore, freely available to meet losses that subsequently materialize.
Stage 2 (representing lifetime ECL provisions on underperforming loans)—Consider as Specific Provision for regulatory purposes. However, any portion that represents an amount for future, presently unidentified losses, would qualify as GRCL.
Stage 3 (representing lifetime ECL provisions on nonperforming loans)—Consider as Specific Provision for regulatory purposes.
The GRCL amount that may be included in tier 2 Capital, gross of tax effects, under the Prudential Standard APS 111 Capital Adequacy: Measurement of Capital (APS 111) (paragraph 32) remains unchanged. APRA already has adopted a GRCL concept in APS 220 that reflects a lifetime ECL concept within its prudential framework. APRA’s informal consultation has indicated that regulated entities will not need transitional arrangements. However, if entities believe that their capital position will be significantly affected, they should approach APRA for discussion on possible transition arrangements. APRA intends to update APS 220 in due course to reflect the appropriate treatment of provisions under AASB 9.
Related Link: Letter on AASB 9 (PDF)
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Australia, APRA, AASB 9, IFRS 9, ECL, APS 220
Previous ArticleCBRC Consults on Measures for Managing Large Exposures of Banks
RBNZ published the financial stability report for May 2020. This review of the financial system in the country highlights that the economic disruption associated with COVID-19 will present challenges to the financial system.
Financial policymakers and international standard-setters met virtually with private-sector executives to discuss international policy responses to COVID-19 pandemic.
HKMA is consulting on revisions to the Supervisory Policy Manual module CR-G-14 on margin and other risk mitigation standards for non-centrally cleared over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives transactions.
EBA published thematic note presenting a preliminary assessment of the impact of COVID-19 outbreak on the banking sector in EU.
HKMA published a circular, addressed to authorized institutions, on the application of the Basel Committee guidance on certain COVID-related measures.
PRA provided further information on the application of regulatory capital and IFRS 9 requirements to payment holidays granted or extended to address the challenges arising from COVID-19 outbreak.
PRA published final policy (in PS13/20) setting out the approach and expectations for authorization and supervision of insurance special purpose vehicles (ISPVs or insurance SPVs).
BoE published version 2.0.1 of the Capital+ XBRL Utility, along with the related release notes.
HKMA announced the publication of a report on fintech adoption and innovation in the banking industry in Hong Kong.
BIS published a working paper that examines the drivers of cyber risk, especially in context of the cloud services.