NBB published the financial stability report, with macro-prudential policy being one of the key focus areas in the context of the wide set of economic and financial policies adopted amid the COVID-19 crisis. The report highlights that COVID-19 pandemic posed challenges to the financial sector and financial stability; however, the Belgian financial system has solid capital and liquidity buffers and can, thus, play a key role in cushioning the impact of the crisis on households and businesses. NBB, as a supervisor, calls on financial institutions to continue to support the real economy, if necessary, by using the built-up capital and liquidity buffers.
The report discusses the macro-prudential policy in Belgium, examines the financial stability of banking and insurance sectors, and contains a couple of thematic articles on the residential and commercial real estate market and the climate-change-related transition risks associated with real estate exposures in the Belgian financial sector. In terms of the forward-looking guidance on macro-prudential aspects, NBB emphasizes that, taking into account the latest scenarios and prospects, the deactivation of the countercyclical capital buffer, which was announced in March 2020, is likely to be extended until at least mid-2021. NBB is closely monitoring developments on the Belgian real estate and credit markets and it stands ready to release the macro-prudential capital buffers for real estate risks if, for example, those risks should materialist and lead to a substantial increase in non-performing loans. Supervisory expectations on mortgage credit also remain applicable. Although the macro-prudential buffers for systemically important institutions (the so-called O-SII buffers) are primarily structural, a release of such buffers is in principle possible.
NBB highlights the importance of financial sector continuing to play its role as a financial intermediary and actively contributing to cushioning the impact of the crisis and supporting the real economy. In this context, NBB makes a number of recommendations to the financial sector, particularly the credit institutions:
- The first recommendation aims to encourage maximum responsible use of micro- and macro-prudential buffers to support the real economy. The use of such buffers by individual banks is justified from a macro-prudential point of view and supports the real economy by avoiding pro-cyclical credit crunches. Individual banks’ reluctance to use these buffers—for example, on the grounds of stigma effects or as a precaution for possible future solvency issues—may be counterproductive in the context of this crisis and may substantially increase the impact of the crisis on the real economy.
- Against the backdrop of unprecedented micro- and macro-prudential easing as well as significant uncertainty as to financial institutions’ future profitability, NBB, as the macro-prudential authority, also recommends that the financial sector should temporarily exercise the necessary restraint with regard to current and future dividend payout policies (and similar operations) or in the allocation of variable remuneration for senior staff; the sector should refrain from making dividend payments or similar operations at least until the beginning of October 2020. Regarding credit institutions, this recommendation applies to all banks active in Belgium and to dividend payments and/or transfers or similar transactions within international banking groups by systemically important subsidiaries active in Belgium.
- In addition to the necessary focus on the short-term implications of the COVID-19 crisis, the financial sector should continue to pay attention to major longer-term structural challenges. For example, the persisting low interest rate environment remains a major structural challenge for the profitability of banks and a reassessment of the viability of certain business models is needed. In addition, the transition to a more sustainable and digitized economy will gain more traction. It is very important not only to exploit the opportunities of such transitions but also to closely monitor and mitigate the inherent risks that such structural transitions necessarily entail, also in terms of financial stability.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Insurance, Financial Stability Report, Basel, COVID-19, Credit Risk, RRE, CRE, Climate Change Risk, Systemic Risk, Macro-Prudential Policy, NBB
Leading economist; commercial real estate; performance forecasting, econometric infrastructure; data modeling; credit risk modeling; portfolio assessment; custom commercial real estate analysis; thought leader.
Previous ArticleCBM Extends Application Deadline and Duration of Loan Moratoria
PRA published the policy statement PS8/21, which contains the final supervisory statement SS3/21 on the PRA approach to supervision of the new and growing non-systemic banks in UK.
EBA published a report that sets out the final draft regulatory technical standards specifying the conditions according to which consolidation shall be carried out in line with Article 18 of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
EBA updated the list of other systemically important institutions (O-SIIs) in EU.
BCBS published two reports that discuss transmission channels of climate-related risks to the banking system and the measurement methodologies of climate-related financial risks.
UK Authorities (FCA and PRA) welcomed the findings of FSB peer review on the implementation of financial sector remuneration reforms in the UK.
PRA and FCA jointly issued a letter that highlights risks associated with the increasing volumes of deposits that are placed with banks and building societies via deposit aggregators and how to mitigate these risks.
MFSA announced that amendments to the Banking Act, Subsidiary Legislation, and Banking Rules will be issued in the coming months, to transpose the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5) into the national regulatory framework.
EC finalized the Delegated Regulation 2021/598 that supplements the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR or 575/2013) and lays out the regulatory technical standards for assigning risk-weights to specialized lending exposures.
OSFI launched a consultation to explore ways to enhance the OSFI assurance over capital, leverage, and liquidity returns for banks and insurers, given the increasing complexity arising from the evolving regulatory reporting framework due to IFRS 17 (Insurance Contracts) standard and Basel III reforms.
ECB published results of the benchmarking analysis of the recovery plan cycle for 2019.