US agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) published a report that assesses credit risks in context of the loans originated on or before June 30, 2019 by the supervised banks. This review is part of the Shared National Credit (SNC) Program, which assesses credit risk and trends as well as risk management practices associated with the largest and most complex credits shared by multiple regulated financial institutions. The report finds that credit risk associated with leveraged lending remains elevated. Also, the share and amount of loan commitments with the lowest supervisory ratings (special mention and classified) rose slightly between 2018 and 2019.
Based on the definitions in the agencies’ uniform loan classification standards and examination manuals, classified risk ratings include commitments rated substandard, doubtful, and loss. Loans that are special mention and classified are considered non-pass loans. The report finds that the total special mention and classified commitment levels remain elevated compared with lows reached during previous periods of strong economic performance. A significant portion of special mention and classified commitments are concentrated in transactions that agent banks identified and reported as leveraged loans. There has been accumulation of risk in bank-identified leveraged loan structures through the long period of economic expansion. In response, most banks have adopted credit risk management practices to monitor and control this evolving risk. Some of these controls, however, have not been tested in an economic downturn.
Overall, the agent banks’ risk management practices for leveraged loan commitments have improved since 2013. They are better equipped to assess borrower repayment capacity and estimate enterprise valuations while having improved other risk management practices. The agencies expect that banks engaged in originating and participating in leveraged lending should ensure their risk management processes remain effective in changing market conditions. Controls should ensure that financial analysis, completed during underwriting and to monitor performance, is based on appropriate revenue, growth, and cost savings assumptions and considers the impact of incremental facilities. All banks should ensure that portfolio management and stress testing processes consider that recovery rates may differ from historical experience. Banks also should consider how potential risks from a downturn in the leveraged lending market may affect other customers and borrowers. The agencies expect identified risks to be measured against their potential impact on earnings and capital.
The SNC Program is governed by an interagency agreement, with the agencies conducting SNC reviews in the first and third calendar quarters with some banks receiving two reviews and others receiving a single review each year. The 2019 SNC portfolio included 5,474 borrowers, totaling USD 4.8 trillion, up from USD 4.4 trillion in 2018. U.S. banks held the greatest volume of SNC commitments at 44.4% of the portfolio, followed by foreign banking organizations and other investor entities such as securitization pools, hedge funds, insurance companies, and pension funds. Total commitments increased by USD 396 billion, or 8.9%, from third quarter of 2018 to the third quarter of 2019. The next report will be published following the third quarter 2020 SNC examination.
Keywords: Americas, US, Banking, Credit Risk, Leveraged Lending, Loan Origination, SNC Loans, US Agencies
Previous ArticleFED Examines Whether G-SIBs in US Influence Their Capital Surcharges
The European Commission (EC) published the Delegated Regulation 2021/1527 with regard to the regulatory technical standards for the contractual recognition of write down and conversion powers.
In a response to the questions posed by a member of the European Parliament, the President Christine Lagarde highlighted the commitment of the European Central Bank (ECB) to an ambitious climate-related action plan along with a roadmap, which was published in July 2021.
The Single Resolution Board (SRB) published a Communication on the application of regulatory technical standard provisions on prior permission for reducing eligible liabilities instruments as of January 01, 2022.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published a new set of frequently asked questions (FAQs) to provide guidance to authorized deposit-taking institutions on the interpretation of APS 120, the prudential standard on securitization.
The French Prudential Control and Resolution Authority (ACPR) published the corrective version of the RUBA taxonomy Version 1.0.1, which will come into force from the decree of January 31, 2022.
The European Commission (EC) announced that Nordea Bank has signed a guarantee agreement with the European Investment Bank (EIB) Group to support the sustainable transformation of businesses in the Nordics.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published a new set of frequently asked questions (FAQs) to clarify the regulatory capital treatment of investments in the overseas deposit-taking and insurance subsidiaries.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final report on the guidelines specifying the criteria to assess the exceptional cases when institutions exceed the large exposure limits and the time and measures needed for institutions to return to compliance.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) issued the policy statement PS20/21, which contains final rules for the application of existing consolidated prudential requirements to financial holding companies and mixed financial holding companies.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) revised the guidelines on stress tests to be conducted by the national deposit guarantee schemes under the Deposit Guarantee Schemes Directive (DGSD).