FCA issued a letter to ISDA in response to an ISDA letter to FSB. In this letter, ISDA had asked whether FCA and ICE Benchmark Administration (IBA) can give further clarity about the length of any “reasonable period” in which a non-representative LIBOR might be published prior to the final cessation of LIBOR. The FCA letter sets out its response to describe the laws relevant in this situation and provides clarity on how FCA intends to apply these laws. IBA also responded to the ISDA letter and has announced a rulebook consultation process regarding the inclusion of an automatic trigger.
The FCA letter sets out why market participants should not assume that any period of non-representative LIBOR based on reduced panel bank submissions would last for more than a short period. The law governing critical benchmarks such as LIBOR is set out in the EU Benchmarks Regulation. Notwithstanding the preference for an orderly cessation, planned in advance, the mechanics of the Benchmarks Regulation mean that the publication of a non-representative LIBOR cannot be ruled out, at least for a period of time. EU-supervised firms could potentially be prohibited from entering into new LIBOR transactions, and even from continuing to use LIBOR in existing transactions in some circumstances, under the Benchmarks Regulation.
FCA has made clear that it sees no way of changing LIBOR to make it representative again after the panel bank departures have rendered it non-representative. Consequently, the only way FCA sees this provision operating in practice is that the administrator must cease the rate within a reasonable time period. Moreover, a non-representative panel bank LIBOR could continue only for such time as a minimum number of panel banks were prepared to continue contributing to the benchmark such that IBA’s Reduced Submissions Policy did not apply. FCA has made clear that it has no plans to compel panel banks to contribute once the existing voluntary agreement with them expires. Consistent with having no plans to compel panel banks to contribute after 2021, assuming insufficient willing voluntary contributors, FCA would not expect to compel IBA to continue to produce a non-representative panel bank LIBOR.
FCA would not seek to prolong a non-representative panel bank LIBOR simply to benefit firms which had failed, or continued to fail, to act on opportunities to transition. Where contracts can practicably be amended to reference alternative rates by bilateral agreement or other arrangements, they should be, before end-2021. EU supervised firms are required by the Benchmarks Regulation to have appropriate plans in the event that a benchmark materially changes or ceases to be provided. Firms can meet this requirement by having pre-cessation triggers included in LIBOR contracts that cannot be proactively transitioned away from the rate. FCA recognizes that there are some LIBOR-referencing contracts that it is not practicable to change and a task force under the Sterling Risk Free Rate Working Group has been dedicated to the topic of "tough legacy."
Keywords: International, Europe, UK, Banking, Securities, LIBOR, IBOR, Pre-Cessation Triggers, Interest Rate Benchmarks, Derivatives, Benchmarks Regulation, FSB, FCA, ISDA
Previous ArticleECB Welcomes Ratification of Agreement on Orderly Brexit
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published four draft principles to support supervisory efforts in assessing the representativeness of COVID-19-impacted data for banks using the internal ratings based (IRB) credit risk models.
The European Council and the European Parliament (EP) reached a provisional political agreement on the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD).
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) launched a consultation (CP6/22) that sets out proposal for a new Supervisory Statement on expectations for management of model risk by banks.
The European Commission (EC) published the Delegated Regulation 2022/954, which amends regulatory technical standards on specification of the calculation of specific and general credit risk adjustments.
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) announced that the Green and Sustainable Finance (GSF) Cross-Agency Steering Group has launched the information and data repositories and outlined the progress made in advancing the development of green and sustainable finance in Hong Kong.
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hub updated its work program, announcing a set of projects across various centers.
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published two consultation papers—one on the supervisory statement on exclusions related to systemic events and the other on the supervisory statement on the management of non-affirmative cyber exposures.
The Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS) published a report that explores the feasibility of integrating the G-Cubed general equilibrium model into the NGFS suite of models.
Certain members of the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs issued a letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published a consultation paper on the advice on the review of the securitization prudential framework in Solvency II.