FCA issued a letter to ISDA in response to an ISDA letter to FSB. In this letter, ISDA had asked whether FCA and ICE Benchmark Administration (IBA) can give further clarity about the length of any “reasonable period” in which a non-representative LIBOR might be published prior to the final cessation of LIBOR. The FCA letter sets out its response to describe the laws relevant in this situation and provides clarity on how FCA intends to apply these laws. IBA also responded to the ISDA letter and has announced a rulebook consultation process regarding the inclusion of an automatic trigger.
The FCA letter sets out why market participants should not assume that any period of non-representative LIBOR based on reduced panel bank submissions would last for more than a short period. The law governing critical benchmarks such as LIBOR is set out in the EU Benchmarks Regulation. Notwithstanding the preference for an orderly cessation, planned in advance, the mechanics of the Benchmarks Regulation mean that the publication of a non-representative LIBOR cannot be ruled out, at least for a period of time. EU-supervised firms could potentially be prohibited from entering into new LIBOR transactions, and even from continuing to use LIBOR in existing transactions in some circumstances, under the Benchmarks Regulation.
FCA has made clear that it sees no way of changing LIBOR to make it representative again after the panel bank departures have rendered it non-representative. Consequently, the only way FCA sees this provision operating in practice is that the administrator must cease the rate within a reasonable time period. Moreover, a non-representative panel bank LIBOR could continue only for such time as a minimum number of panel banks were prepared to continue contributing to the benchmark such that IBA’s Reduced Submissions Policy did not apply. FCA has made clear that it has no plans to compel panel banks to contribute once the existing voluntary agreement with them expires. Consistent with having no plans to compel panel banks to contribute after 2021, assuming insufficient willing voluntary contributors, FCA would not expect to compel IBA to continue to produce a non-representative panel bank LIBOR.
FCA would not seek to prolong a non-representative panel bank LIBOR simply to benefit firms which had failed, or continued to fail, to act on opportunities to transition. Where contracts can practicably be amended to reference alternative rates by bilateral agreement or other arrangements, they should be, before end-2021. EU supervised firms are required by the Benchmarks Regulation to have appropriate plans in the event that a benchmark materially changes or ceases to be provided. Firms can meet this requirement by having pre-cessation triggers included in LIBOR contracts that cannot be proactively transitioned away from the rate. FCA recognizes that there are some LIBOR-referencing contracts that it is not practicable to change and a task force under the Sterling Risk Free Rate Working Group has been dedicated to the topic of "tough legacy."
Keywords: International, Europe, UK, Banking, Securities, LIBOR, IBOR, Pre-Cessation Triggers, Interest Rate Benchmarks, Derivatives, Benchmarks Regulation, FSB, FCA, ISDA
Previous ArticleECB Welcomes Ratification of Agreement on Orderly Brexit
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the final policy statement PS21/21 on the leverage ratio framework in the UK. PS21/21, which sets out the final policy of both the Financial Policy Committee (FPC) and PRA
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) proposed to amend Regulation B to implement changes to the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA) under Section 1071 of the Dodd-Frank Act.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) decided to maintain, at the 2019 levels, the buffer rates for the Other Systemically Important Institutions (O-SII) for another year, with no new rates to be set until December 2023.
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a progress report on implementation of its high-level recommendations for the regulation, supervision, and oversight of global stablecoin arrangements.
In a letter to the authorized deposit taking institutions, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) announced an increase in the minimum interest rate buffer it expects banks to use when assessing the serviceability of home loan applications.
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) are consulting on the preliminary guidance that clarifies that stablecoin arrangements should observe international standards for payment, clearing, and settlement systems.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) and the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) have set out their respective work priorities for 2022.
The Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA) updated the guidelines on supervisory reporting requirements under the reporting framework 3.0, in addition to the reporting module on leverage under the common reporting (COREP) framework.
The European Commission (EC) published the Implementing Decision 2021/1753 on the equivalence of supervisory and regulatory requirements of certain third countries and territories for the purposes of the treatment of exposures, in accordance with the Capital Requirements Regulation or CRR (575/2013).
EC published the Implementing Regulation 2021/1751, which lays down implementing technical standards on uniform formats and templates for notification of determination of the impracticability of including contractual recognition of write-down and conversion powers.