PRA published a letter that presents the key themes that emerged from its survey on cyber insurance underwriting risk. This letter from Anna Sweeney, Director of Insurance Supervision, is addressed to the Chief Executives of specialist general insurance firms.
In July 2017, PRA had published the supervisory statement SS4/17 on cyber insurance underwriting risk. SS4/17 set out the PRA expectations for insurers on the prudent management of cyber underwriting risk in the areas of actively managing non-affirmative cyber risk; setting clearly defined cyber strategies and risk appetites that are agreed by the board; building and continuously developing insurer cyber expertise. In May 2018, and after discussing with industry associations and Lloyd’s, PRA conducted a follow-up survey involving firms of varying size. This letter provides feedback on the key themes that emerged from firms’ responses and describes areas inn which the PRA thinks that firms can do more to ensure the prudent management of cyber risk exposures.
The survey results suggest that although some work has been done, more ground needs to be covered by firms especially in relation to non-affirmative cyber risk management, risk appetite, and strategy. Having reviewed the responses of firms, PRA also believes that the expectations set out in SS4/17 are relevant and valid. SS4/17 set out the PRA expectations that firms should:
- Robustly assess and effectively manage their insurance products with specific consideration to non-affirmative cyber risk exposure
- Monitor their aggregate cyber underwriting exposure and conduct underwriting risk stress tests that explicitly consider the potential for loss aggregation (in case of firms writing affirmative cyber products)
- Consider cyber underwriting risk stress tests with consideration given to loss aggregation at extreme return periods (up to 1 in 200 years)
In the letter, PRA states that the responsibility is on firms to progress their work and fully align with the expectations set out in SS4/17. In relation to the expectation that firms reduce the unintended exposure to non-affirmative cyber risk, insurers should develop an action plan by the first half of 2019, with clear milestones and dates by which action will be taken. Supervisors may ask to review this plan and subsequent progress toward it. Over the rest of the year, PRA plans to undertake the following steps:
- Provide further, targeted feedback to surveyed firms by arranging meetings with individual surveyed firms by the end of the first quarter of 2019
- Coordinate with Lloyd’s to agree any follow-up actions in relation to Lloyd’s managing agents
- Carry out sample deep-dive reviews to other firms (not necessarily those in the initial sample) in second half of 2019 to assess how these firms are meeting the expectations set out in SS4/17
Keywords: Europe, UK, Insurance, Cyber Risk, Underwriting Risk, SS4/17, PRA
PRA published the policy statement PS8/21, which contains the final supervisory statement SS3/21 on the PRA approach to supervision of the new and growing non-systemic banks in UK.
EBA published a report that sets out the final draft regulatory technical standards specifying the conditions according to which consolidation shall be carried out in line with Article 18 of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
EBA updated the list of other systemically important institutions (O-SIIs) in EU.
BCBS published two reports that discuss transmission channels of climate-related risks to the banking system and the measurement methodologies of climate-related financial risks.
UK Authorities (FCA and PRA) welcomed the findings of FSB peer review on the implementation of financial sector remuneration reforms in the UK.
PRA and FCA jointly issued a letter that highlights risks associated with the increasing volumes of deposits that are placed with banks and building societies via deposit aggregators and how to mitigate these risks.
MFSA announced that amendments to the Banking Act, Subsidiary Legislation, and Banking Rules will be issued in the coming months, to transpose the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5) into the national regulatory framework.
EC finalized the Delegated Regulation 2021/598 that supplements the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR or 575/2013) and lays out the regulatory technical standards for assigning risk-weights to specialized lending exposures.
OSFI launched a consultation to explore ways to enhance the OSFI assurance over capital, leverage, and liquidity returns for banks and insurers, given the increasing complexity arising from the evolving regulatory reporting framework due to IFRS 17 (Insurance Contracts) standard and Basel III reforms.
ECB published results of the benchmarking analysis of the recovery plan cycle for 2019.