ISDA published the first in a series of "legal" guidelines for smart derivatives contracts. The guidelines outline some potential smart derivatives contract models, set out principles for the development of smart derivatives contracts, and identify contractual and documentation issues that may be relevant in the development and implementation of new technology platforms, products, and solutions for use within the derivatives industry.
The guidelines are not intended to specify or recommend any particular approach, or address any particular technological application or project. Rather, they are intended to provide high-level guidance on the legal documentation and framework that governs derivatives trading and to point out certain issues that may need to be considered by technology developers when introducing technology into that framework. The guidelines establish that smart derivatives contracts do not necessarily need distributed ledger technology (DLT) to function and the adoption of smart derivatives contracts could be facilitated through other technology solutions. However, DLT is well-suited to the implementation of smart contract technology. These guidelines, therefore, assume that many smart derivatives contract models and applications may make use of DLT in some form.The paper establishes the following four principles in the development of smart derivatives contracts:
- Smart derivatives contracts should be compatible with existing standards.
- Only those parts of a derivatives contract that are capable of being automated should be considered.
- Effective automation should be based on legal validation.
- Only those parts of a derivatives contract where there exists sufficient benefit in automating should be considered for automation.
The guidelines also outline the considerations for technology developers. The application of technology solutions to ISDA documentation raises some interesting questions about the precise boundaries of the single agreement architecture. One of the most fundamental questions is whether computer code might ultimately form part of the single agreement. The single agreement approach ensures that each party has a single legal relationship and financial exposure to its counterparty. Where the technology application is designed to record transaction data, it will be important to consider whether this data or any data outputs (for example, settlement records) should be considered part of the single agreement. A potential consequence of data sitting outside the single agreement construct is that it may not be admissible for construction of the overall legal and contractual relationship in the event of a dispute or close out. ISDA guidelines specify that, in designing technology enabled solutions for the trading or processing of derivatives, technology developers should work with their legal advisers to understand the various points of connection between each of the documents, take account of legal relationships created with any third parties, and consider how the solution may impact upon the entirety of the contractual relationship.
Keywords: International, Banking, Securities, Regtech, Derivatives Contracts, Smart Contracts, Distributed Ledger Technology, Guideline, ISDA
Previous ArticleEBA Updates List of Correlated Currencies Under CRR
EU published Directive 2021/338, which amends the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID) II and the Capital Requirements Directives (CRD 4 and 5) to facilitate recovery from the COVID-19 crisis.
The Standing Committee of the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) recommended that a systemic risk buffer level of 4.5% for domestic exposures can be considered appropriate for addressing the identified systemic risks to the stability of the financial system in Norway.
In a recent statement, PRA clarified its approach to the application of certain EU regulatory technical standards and EBA guidelines on standardized and internal ratings-based approaches to credit risk, following the end of the Brexit transition.
In a recently published letter addressed to the G20 finance ministers and central bank governors, the FSB Chair Randal K. Quarles has set out the key FSB priorities for 2021.
EU published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, a corrigendum to the revised Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR2 or Regulation 2019/876).
ESAs published a joint supervisory statement on the effective and consistent application and on national supervision of the regulation on sustainability-related disclosures in the financial services sector (SFDR).
EC published a public consultation on the review of crisis management and deposit insurance frameworks in EU.
HKMA announced that enhancements will be made to the Special 100% Loan Guarantee of the SME Financing Guarantee Scheme (SFGS) and the application period will be extended to December 31, 2021.
EBA launched consultations on the regulatory and implementing technical standards on cooperation and information exchange between competent authorities involved in prudential supervision of investment firms.
BoE issued a letter to the CEOs of eight major UK banks that are in scope of the first Resolvability Assessment Framework (RAF) reporting and disclosure cycle.