OSFI published an implementation note that outlines the key principles and processes for the assessment of internal models used for regulatory capital calculations (capital models), in alignment with the Capital Adequacy Requirements (CAR) Guideline. These capital models relate to the measurement of credit, market, and counterparty credit risks for calculating minimum regulatory capital requirements. The Capital Model Assessment Program (CMAP) applies to all deposit-taking institutions intending to use new capital models or intending to implement the modifications to the previously approved capital models.
Under Chapter 1 of the CAR Guideline, institutions are required to obtain approval from OSFI prior to the use of advanced approaches for regulatory capital. The assessment of these capital models is governed by the CMAP for any primary and sub-risk factor eligible for the internal model regime. Out of the primary risk factors, the internal ratings-based (IRB) approach is applicable for credit risk and the internal model approach (IMA) is applicable for market risk. Additionally, counterparty credit risk is considered a sub-risk factor and is eligible for the Internal Model Method (IMM). The CMAP framework defines acceptance standards that are designed to help an institution establish a model that meets the minimum regulatory requirements at the onset of an OSFI approval and on an ongoing basis.
The implementation note describes the CMAP applicable to both, the new applicants and the accredited institutions. Once an institution is accredited, the CMAP covers entirety of the capital model lifecycle from the assessment of new model applications to any subsequent modifications, performance monitoring, periodic ongoing compliance reviews, and model decertification. According to this implementation note, applications are only required from institutions to OSFI for new models, material modifications, and acquisitions. Post-implementation reviews are outside the scope of this implementation note and managed through customary supervisory processes. Once an institution achieves accreditation, it is expected to maintain robust controls to ensure ongoing compliance with requirements of the CAR Guideline, relevant implementation notes, and Guideline E-23 on enterprise-wide model risk management for deposit-taking institutions. Accredited institutions are required to provide the following information to their Lead Supervisor within six months of each fiscal year-end:
- A letter from the Chief Risk Officer, confirming that the existing inventory of approved capital models continues to adhere to all minimum applicable requirements.
- Positive assurance from Internal Audit, in respect of the effectiveness of controls designed by management to ensure applicability to the inventory of approved capital models remains appropriate for regulatory capital purposes. Appended to this opinion should be a completed copy of the self-assessment for each risk factor. Supporting materials should be available and provided to OSFI upon request.
- A list of all approved capital models in production as of the reporting date. For IMA, this should also include the list of approved products to which the capital models are applied.
- A list of all waivers, exemptions, and migrations applicable as of the reporting date. Moreover, the name of the portfolio, its size, and expiry date of the waiver should be clearly reported.
Related Link: Implementation Note
Keywords: Americas, Canada, Banking, Regulatory Capital, CAR Guideline, Credit Risk, Market Risk, Counterparty Credit Risk, IRB Approach, Internal Model, Basel, OSFI
Previous ArticleESMA Responds to EFRAG Advice, Supports Endorsement of IFRS 17
EU published Directive 2021/338, which amends the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID) II and the Capital Requirements Directives (CRD 4 and 5) to facilitate recovery from the COVID-19 crisis.
The Standing Committee of the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) recommended that a systemic risk buffer level of 4.5% for domestic exposures can be considered appropriate for addressing the identified systemic risks to the stability of the financial system in Norway.
In a recent statement, PRA clarified its approach to the application of certain EU regulatory technical standards and EBA guidelines on standardized and internal ratings-based approaches to credit risk, following the end of the Brexit transition.
In a recently published letter addressed to the G20 finance ministers and central bank governors, the FSB Chair Randal K. Quarles has set out the key FSB priorities for 2021.
EU published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, a corrigendum to the revised Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR2 or Regulation 2019/876).
ESAs published a joint supervisory statement on the effective and consistent application and on national supervision of the regulation on sustainability-related disclosures in the financial services sector (SFDR).
EC published a public consultation on the review of crisis management and deposit insurance frameworks in EU.
HKMA announced that enhancements will be made to the Special 100% Loan Guarantee of the SME Financing Guarantee Scheme (SFGS) and the application period will be extended to December 31, 2021.
EBA launched consultations on the regulatory and implementing technical standards on cooperation and information exchange between competent authorities involved in prudential supervision of investment firms.
BoE issued a letter to the CEOs of eight major UK banks that are in scope of the first Resolvability Assessment Framework (RAF) reporting and disclosure cycle.