EBA published additional clarifications on issues raised on the application of prudential framework, as a consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic. The clarifications mainly cover the EBA guidelines on moratoria and COVID-19 reporting, operational risk, downturn LGD estimation, and treatment of COVID‐19 public guarantee schemes. This report is a part of the wider monitoring of the implementation of COVID-19 policies by EBA as well as of the application of existing policies under these exceptional circumstances.
The clarifications update the frequently asked questions (FAQs) section in the EBA report (previous version was dated December 21, 2020) on COVID-19 implementation policies. The update includes additional technical clarifications on the application of the guidelines on moratoria related to the recent re-activation of the EBA guidelines on payment moratoria. EBA has provided clarifications on the functioning of the nine-month cap, which limits the period of time for which payments on a certain loan can be suspended, postponed, or reduced as a result of the application (and reapplication) of general payment moratoria. These clarifications explain how to apply the guidelines on moratoria when assessing forbearance classification and how to determine whether there is a diminished financial obligation in relation to moratoria applied to loans exceeding the nine-month cap. Regarding reporting and disclosures, the updated report covers the treatment of loans and advances subject to expired moratoria; it clarifies that when a moratorium expires, the loans and advances subject to this expired measure should be reported, regardless of whether they are subject to another measure.
The report also includes considerations for criteria that institutions should adopt with regard to operational risk in the context of the pandemic. The common criteria provided in the report aim to reduce possible inconsistencies in the calculation of capital requirements and supervisory reporting for operational risk. This will allow institutions to have a clear view of supervisory and regulatory expectations, when dealing with operational risk events and losses stemming from the COVID‐19 pandemic. The report also includes clarifications on the likely identification of a COVID‐19‐triggered downturn period and its incorporation into downturn LGD estimation. Finally, the report clarifies the treatment of COVID‐19 public guarantee schemes as a form of credit risk mitigation under the advanced internal ratings-based, or A-IRB, approach. In consideration of the rapid succession of COVID‐19‐related events, the report may be updated in the future with additional clarification on the prudential treatment of COVID‐19‐related measures as well as on the implementation issues surrounding the existing policies in the context of the current pandemic.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, COVID-19, Basel, Reporting, FAQ, Credit Risk, Operational Risk, Disclosures, IRB Approach, Loan Moratorium, Loan Guarantee, Regulatory Capital, EBA
Previous ArticleEBA and ECB Announce the 2021 Stress Test Exercise for Banks in EU
BIS published a paper that provides an overview on the use of big data and machine learning in the central bank community.
APRA finalized the reporting standard ARS 115.0 on capital adequacy with respect to the standardized measurement approach to operational risk for authorized deposit-taking institutions in Australia.
ECB published a guide that outlines the principles and methods for calculating the penalties for regulatory breaches of prudential requirements by banks.
MAS and The Association of Banks in Singapore (ABS) jointly issued a paper that sets out good practices for the management of operational and other risks stemming from new work arrangements adopted by financial institutions amid the COVID-19 pandemic.
ACPR announced that a new data collection application, called DLPP (Datalake for Prudential), for collecting banking and insurance prudential data will go into production on April 12, 2021.
BCB announced that the Financial Stability Committee decided to maintain the countercyclical capital buffer (CCyB) for Brazil at 0%, at least until the end of 2021.
EIOPA has launched a European-wide comparative study on non-life underwriting risk in internal models, also kicking-off of the data collection phase.
SRB published an overview of the resolution tools available in the Banking Union and their impact on a bank’s ability to maintain continuity of access to financial market infrastructure services in resolution.
EBA is consulting on the implementing technical standards for Pillar 3 disclosures on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risks, as set out in requirements under Article 449a of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
ESAs Issue Advice on KPIs on Sustainability for Nonfinancial Reporting