EBA published additional clarifications on issues raised on the application of prudential framework, as a consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic. The clarifications mainly cover the EBA guidelines on moratoria and COVID-19 reporting, operational risk, downturn LGD estimation, and treatment of COVID‐19 public guarantee schemes. This report is a part of the wider monitoring of the implementation of COVID-19 policies by EBA as well as of the application of existing policies under these exceptional circumstances.
The clarifications update the frequently asked questions (FAQs) section in the EBA report (previous version was dated December 21, 2020) on COVID-19 implementation policies. The update includes additional technical clarifications on the application of the guidelines on moratoria related to the recent re-activation of the EBA guidelines on payment moratoria. EBA has provided clarifications on the functioning of the nine-month cap, which limits the period of time for which payments on a certain loan can be suspended, postponed, or reduced as a result of the application (and reapplication) of general payment moratoria. These clarifications explain how to apply the guidelines on moratoria when assessing forbearance classification and how to determine whether there is a diminished financial obligation in relation to moratoria applied to loans exceeding the nine-month cap. Regarding reporting and disclosures, the updated report covers the treatment of loans and advances subject to expired moratoria; it clarifies that when a moratorium expires, the loans and advances subject to this expired measure should be reported, regardless of whether they are subject to another measure.
The report also includes considerations for criteria that institutions should adopt with regard to operational risk in the context of the pandemic. The common criteria provided in the report aim to reduce possible inconsistencies in the calculation of capital requirements and supervisory reporting for operational risk. This will allow institutions to have a clear view of supervisory and regulatory expectations, when dealing with operational risk events and losses stemming from the COVID‐19 pandemic. The report also includes clarifications on the likely identification of a COVID‐19‐triggered downturn period and its incorporation into downturn LGD estimation. Finally, the report clarifies the treatment of COVID‐19 public guarantee schemes as a form of credit risk mitigation under the advanced internal ratings-based, or A-IRB, approach. In consideration of the rapid succession of COVID‐19‐related events, the report may be updated in the future with additional clarification on the prudential treatment of COVID‐19‐related measures as well as on the implementation issues surrounding the existing policies in the context of the current pandemic.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, COVID-19, Basel, Reporting, FAQ, Credit Risk, Operational Risk, Disclosures, IRB Approach, Loan Moratorium, Loan Guarantee, Regulatory Capital, EBA
Previous ArticleEBA and ECB Announce the 2021 Stress Test Exercise for Banks in EU
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published four draft principles to support supervisory efforts in assessing the representativeness of COVID-19-impacted data for banks using the internal ratings based (IRB) credit risk models.
The European Council and the European Parliament (EP) reached a provisional political agreement on the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD).
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) launched a consultation (CP6/22) that sets out proposal for a new Supervisory Statement on expectations for management of model risk by banks.
The European Commission (EC) published the Delegated Regulation 2022/954, which amends regulatory technical standards on specification of the calculation of specific and general credit risk adjustments.
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hub updated its work program, announcing a set of projects across various centers.
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published two consultation papers—one on the supervisory statement on exclusions related to systemic events and the other on the supervisory statement on the management of non-affirmative cyber exposures.
Certain members of the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs issued a letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published a consultation paper on the advice on the review of the securitization prudential framework in Solvency II.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) issued a statement on PRA buffer adjustment while the Bank of England (BoE) published a notice on the statistical reporting requirements for banks.
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) issued principles for the effective management and supervision of climate-related financial risks.