The Green Finance Industry Taskforce (GFIT or the Taskforce) of MAS proposed the taxonomy for Singapore-based financial institutions to identify and classify activities that can be considered green or transitioning toward green. The comment period on this consultation will end on March 11, 2021. The Taskforce also launched a handbook on implementing environmental risk management for asset managers, banks, and insurers. In addition, the Taskforce is exploring technology solutions for financial institutions to enhance the quality of their climate-related disclosures. The Taskforce aims to pilot innovations that seek to solve the challenges in mobilizing green finance across sectors. These resources will complement the taxonomy and handbook.
Consultation on green and transition taxonomy
The consultation seeks feedback on the Taskforce's recommendations on the environmental objectives, focus sectors, and a “traffic-light” system, which sets out how activities can be classified as green, yellow (transition), or red according to their level of alignment with environmental objectives. The consultation discusses the merits of a taxonomy for Singapore-based financial institutions, with particular relevance to those active across ASEAN, sets out a basic approach to a taxonomy, identifies economic sectors important to Singapore and Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and that would particularly benefit from such classification, and poses follow-up questions. The consultation provides an introduction to the directional design of a taxonomy. It discusses the environmental objectives of the taxonomy, the sectors that may be covered, the economic activities within those sectors, and the general approach to classification.
The key purpose of developing a green taxonomy for Singapore-based financial institutions is to encourage the flow of capital to support the low-carbon transition needed to avoid catastrophic climate change and to support the environmental objectives of Singapore and the ASEAN nations, which are serviced by Singapore-based financial institutions. Compared to other taxonomies, a key feature of the proposed taxonomy is that it encompasses transition activities that allow for a progressive shift toward greater sustainability while taking into account starting positions and supporting inclusive economic and social development. The taxonomy references international best practices and adapts them to the Asian context where relevant. The Green Finance Industry Taskforce will develop, in its next phase of work, a combination of principle-based criteria and quantifiable thresholds for activities. This will provide clarity and ease the implementation of the taxonomy by financial institutions.
Handbook on implementing environmental risk management
The handbook on implementation of environmental risk management outlines the financial risks arising from environmental risks, the various transmission channels, and the need for a green taxonomy to help financial institutions play a key role in directing capital flows toward sustainable economic activities. The handbook also focuses on effective integration and implementation of environmental risks into the governance framework for financial institutions. Good practices in environmental risk governance include board accountability and oversight, clear delineation of roles and responsibilities for senior management, integration of environmental risk into risk frameworks and policies, board approved risk appetite, and reporting metrics and capacity building. The handbook outlines the steps that financial institutions can take to embed environmental and climate-related financial risk into their risk management processes, make informed decisions, and improve their resilience. The handbook also showcases case studies of effective environmental and climate-related financial disclosures. Effective disclosures allow financial institutions to provide greater transparency on the impact of financially material environmental risks on their business.
Comment Due Date: March 11, 2021
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Singapore, Banking, Insurance, Securities, ESG, Climate Change Risk, Climate-Related Disclosures, Disclosures, Reporting, GFIT, Sustainable Finance, Sustainable Taxonomy, MAS
Previous ArticleHKMA Keeps Countercyclical Capital Buffer at 1%
FDIC is seeking comments on a rule to amend the interagency guidelines for real estate lending policies—also known as the Real Estate Lending Standards.
ISDA is consulting on the implementation of fallbacks for the sterling LIBOR ICE Swap Rate and for the USD LIBOR ICE Swap Rate.
BIS and BoE launched the BIS Innovation Hub Center in London, which is the fourth new Innovation Hub Centre to be opened in the past two years.
ESRB published recommendations on the reciprocation of macro-prudential measures in Belgium, France, Luxembourg, Norway, and Sweden.
SEC announced that the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs released the Spring 2021 Unified Agenda of Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions.
EC published the Delegated Regulation 2021/931, which supplements the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR or Regulation 575/2013) with regard to the regulatory technical standards specifying the method for identifying derivative transactions with one or more than one material risk driver.
BCBS is consulting on preliminary proposals for the prudential treatment of cryptoasset exposures of banks.
EBA issued a revised list of validation rules under the implementing technical standards on supervisory reporting.
BIS Innovation Hub, BDF, and SNB announced that, together with a private-sector consortium led by Accenture, they will conduct an experiment using wholesale central bank digital currency (wCBDC) for cross-border settlement.
ESAs published two amended implementing technical standards on the mapping of credit assessments of External Credit Assessment Institutions (ECAIs).