EIOPA published a discussion paper on open insurance, with the comment period open until April 28, 2021. In the paper, EIOPA explores questions on whether and how far insurance value chains should be opened up by sharing insurance-related and specific policyholder data among insurance and non-insurance firms. The key focus areas of the consultation paper include definition and use cases of open insurance, risks and benefits of open insurance, regulatory barriers to open insurance, and possible areas to consider for a sound open insurance framework. In this context, the paper notes that EC, as part of its Digital Finance Strategy, is expected to present a legislative proposal for a new open finance framework by mid-2022, building on and in full alignment with the broader data access initiatives.
EIOPA highlights that the initial analysis indicates that the exchange of both personal and non-personal data through (open) Application Programming Interfaces has started to emerge in the insurance sector. This can not only facilitate industry-wide innovation but can also give rise to new or amplified risks such as data security, cyber risks, interoperability challenges, and liability, ethical, and broader consumer protection issues. Increased data-sharing, especially if combined with artificial intelligence or machine learning tools, could also increase financial exclusion. A key consideration for possible open insurance solutions is finding a balance between regulatory objectives related to data protection, insurance, and competition while supporting innovation, efficiency, consumer protection, and financial stability. To find such a balance, EIOPA believes a broad multi-stakeholder discussion is needed and strongly encourages stakeholders to provide views to the discussion paper.
The paper sets out certain high-level and interlinked areas, from a supervisory perspective, where further elaboration may be needed, to ensure that open insurance initiatives can be properly grounded technically and practically, to promote consistency with overall consumer protection, financial stability, and sound prudential regulation objectives. Possible open insurance, or open finance, initiatives could include discussion around the regulatory perimeter or licensing regime, taking into account different level of openness; for example, sectoral or cross-sectoral data-sharing could be envisaged with different level of regulatory and supervisory intervention. Compulsory access to and sharing of data, based on the explicit consent of consumers, could be envisaged in the framework of already regulated entities or for certain lines of business—for example, in insurance it could mean accessing and sharing data across insurance undertakings and intermediaries already under the remit of Solvency II Directive. Data standardization might be a prerequisite to support this. Meanwhile, the paper notes that infrastructure for some services similar to open insurance is partly in place: for example, some companies are providing white-label and "insurance-as-a-service" solutions, building on open banking data; some firms are providing open application programming interfaces; and some jurisdictions are facilitating dashboards/aggregators.
In the discussion paper, EIOPA also highlights that different open insurance solutions could further facilitate the uptake of suptech, as it may require that supervisors access consumer insurance services-related data and/or product information data, including ultimately on a real-time basis, to improve their oversight capabilities. This may allow compliance with regulatory goals to be automatically monitored by reading the data that is exchanged by providers via standardized Application programming interface, thus reducing the need to actively collect, verify, and deliver data for supervision. The possibility for supervisors to obtain a whole new range of information previously not available in a standardized and accessible format would also require, from insurance undertaking, a stronger data governance to ensure timeliness and quality. National competent authorities are still at the beginning of investigating how to collect such data in an efficient and proportionate manner. The paper also specifies that national competent authorities expect open insurance theoretically to have the biggest impact in the next three years, with the biggest impact envisaged on supervisory reporting and other data/document collection on an aggregated level.
Comment Due Date: April 28, 2021
Keywords: Europe, EU, Insurance, Open Insurance, Regtech, Suptech, Digital Finance Strategy, Cyber Risk, API, Data Sharing, Solvency II, EIOPA
BIS published the September issue of the Quarterly Review, which contains special features that analyze the rapid rise in equity funding for financial technology firms, the effectiveness of policy measures in response to pandemic, and the evolution of international banking.
The Basel Committee for Banking Supervision (BCBS) met in September 2021 and reviewed climate-related financial risks, discussed impact of digitalization, and welcomed efforts by the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) Foundation to develop a common set of sustainability reporting standards
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) issued a Cease and Desist Order against MUFG Union Bank for deficiencies in technology and operational risk governance.
The European Commission (EC) published the Delegated Regulation 2021/1527 with regard to the regulatory technical standards for the contractual recognition of write down and conversion powers.
In a response to the questions posed by a member of the European Parliament, the President Christine Lagarde highlighted the commitment of the European Central Bank (ECB) to an ambitious climate-related action plan along with a roadmap, which was published in July 2021.
The Single Resolution Board (SRB) published a Communication on the application of regulatory technical standard provisions on prior permission for reducing eligible liabilities instruments as of January 01, 2022.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published a new set of frequently asked questions (FAQs) to provide guidance to authorized deposit-taking institutions on the interpretation of APS 120, the prudential standard on securitization.
The French Prudential Control and Resolution Authority (ACPR) published the corrective version of the RUBA taxonomy Version 1.0.1, which will come into force from the decree of January 31, 2022.
The European Commission (EC) announced that Nordea Bank has signed a guarantee agreement with the European Investment Bank (EIB) Group to support the sustainable transformation of businesses in the Nordics.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published a new set of frequently asked questions (FAQs) to clarify the regulatory capital treatment of investments in the overseas deposit-taking and insurance subsidiaries.