While speaking at the ISDA Annual Legal Forum in London, Edwin Schooling Latter of FCA discussed "what the final steps in transition away from the London Inter-bank Offered Rate (LIBOR) might look like." He expressed his views in the backdrop of the UK's planned adoption of the Sterling Overnight Index Average (SONIA) as its risk-free rate to replace sterling LIBOR. He also discussed that a fallback LIBOR rate is being worked upon for use in legacy contracts after 2021. He emphasized that the best and smoothest transition from LIBOR will be one in which contracts that reference LIBOR are replaced or amended before fallback provisions are triggered.
Mr Latter highlighted that, last year, the market took a very significant step forward on the fundamentally important task of calculating a fallback rate that could replace LIBOR in outstanding contracts. ISDA took the lead on this, at the request of FSB’s Official Sector Steering Group (OSSG), which is the international forum where authorities from across the globe have coordinated their work on interest rate reform. Through its consultation, ISDA has successfully established a wide consensus across different types of market participants and across jurisdictions, on an appropriate, and appropriately fair, way of calculating a fallback rate that could substitute for sterling, yen, and Swiss franc LIBOR in contracts. This fallback rate relies on the risk-free rates identified for these three currencies (that is, SONIA, TONA and SARON). The ISDA consultation proposals attracted a wide consensus that the term element of LIBOR should be replicated by compounding of the observed overnight rates at the end of the relevant term. There are consultations yet to come on the U.S. dollar LIBOR and with regards to euro LIBOR and Euribor.
At this point, the requirements of the European Benchmark Regulation become relevant. Among these requirements is a clear and unambiguous requirement for not only the administrator, but also for the supervisor of the benchmark administrator to assess the capability of a critical benchmark to be representative of an underlying market and economic reality. In case of LIBOR, FCA is the supervisor and it is required to make this assessment of "representativeness" each time a supervised contributor—that is, a panel bank—announces that it intends to stop submitting data. Thus, it is entirely plausible that the end-game for LIBOR will include an assessment by FCA that one or more panels have shrunk so significantly in terms of number of banks or the market share of the banks remaining, that it no longer considers the relevant rate capable of being representative. FCA would announce such a view if and when it is reached. Market participants would then need to consider the many potential negative ramifications of using a rate when its regulator had found it not to be reliably representative of the underlying market.
Mr. Latter mentioned that the share of cleared sterling swaps referencing SONIA grew to 19% in the second half of 2018, from 11% in the first half of 2016. Furthermore, with regard to futures, daily trading volume in SONIA futures and SOFR futures, both averaged 15,000 contracts per day in December. He also added that there is now a wide recognition that LIBOR is coming to an end. Thanks to an agreement reached with 20 panel banks to continue submitting until the end of 2021, LIBOR is not expected to cease before that point. However, there is uncertainty on how LIBOR will end. Therefore, FCA urges those still creating new contracts that reference LIBOR, and have a contract life beyond end-2021, to move rapidly to the new risk-free rates whose continued publication beyond that date can be relied on. FCA believes that the smoothest transition to LIBOR will be one in which contracts that reference LIBOR are replaced or amended before fallback provisions are triggered. Market participants should not rely on the availability of an option to use LIBOR for legacy contracts.
Keywords: Europe, UK, Banking, LIBOR, SONIA, Reference Rates, Interest Rate Benchmarks, FCA
Previous ArticleAPRA Revises Related Entities Standard for Banks
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the final policy statement PS21/21 on the leverage ratio framework in the UK. PS21/21, which sets out the final policy of both the Financial Policy Committee (FPC) and PRA
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) proposed to amend Regulation B to implement changes to the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA) under Section 1071 of the Dodd-Frank Act.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) decided to maintain, at the 2019 levels, the buffer rates for the Other Systemically Important Institutions (O-SII) for another year, with no new rates to be set until December 2023.
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a progress report on implementation of its high-level recommendations for the regulation, supervision, and oversight of global stablecoin arrangements.
In a letter to the authorized deposit taking institutions, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) announced an increase in the minimum interest rate buffer it expects banks to use when assessing the serviceability of home loan applications.
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) are consulting on the preliminary guidance that clarifies that stablecoin arrangements should observe international standards for payment, clearing, and settlement systems.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) and the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) have set out their respective work priorities for 2022.
The Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA) updated the guidelines on supervisory reporting requirements under the reporting framework 3.0, in addition to the reporting module on leverage under the common reporting (COREP) framework.
The European Commission (EC) published the Implementing Decision 2021/1753 on the equivalence of supervisory and regulatory requirements of certain third countries and territories for the purposes of the treatment of exposures, in accordance with the Capital Requirements Regulation or CRR (575/2013).
EC published the Implementing Regulation 2021/1751, which lays down implementing technical standards on uniform formats and templates for notification of determination of the impracticability of including contractual recognition of write-down and conversion powers.