BIS published a report that presents the results of a survey among more than 60 central banks in late 2020 about their engagement in central bank digital currency (CBDC) work, their motivations, and their intentions regarding CBDC issuance. The central banks also provided their views on the legal framework for CBDC and their assessment of the use of cryptocurrencies and stablecoins in their jurisdictions. The survey revealed that central banks are progressing from conceptual research to practical experimentation. Although most central banks do not have plans to launch digital currencies in the foreseeable future, central banks collectively representing a fifth of the world's population are likely to launch retail CBDCs in the next three years.
The survey showed that nearly 86% of the central banks are exploring the benefits and drawbacks of CBDCs. About 60% of the central banks indicated that the crisis has not changed their priority or preference for issuing a CBDC. For the central banks that have altered their stance on CBDC due to the COVID-19 crisis, main reasons are the goal of enabling access to central bank money during times of emergency and the use of CBDC as a potential complement to cash and in-person payment methods when social distancing is required. The notion of using CBDC as a means of government-to person payment, notably direct fiscal assistance or stimulus to households and small businesses, has been also widely shared. Globally, interest in CBDCs continues to be shaped by local circumstances. In emerging market and developing economies, where central banks report relatively stronger motivation, financial inclusion and payments efficiency objectives drive general purpose CBDC work. A testament to these motives is the launch of a first “live” CBDC in the Bahamas. This front-runner is likely to be joined by others.
Despite these developments, the results show that a widespread roll out of CBDCs still seems some way off. Interest and work on CBDCs is global, but motivations for their potential issuance are shaped by local circumstances. Financial inclusion remains a key motivation across emerging market and developing economies and a top priority for CBDC development. In advanced economies, the perceived need for issuance is generally lower and the main areas of interest are related to the efficiency and safety of payments. International policy coordination on CBDCs is set to intensify over the coming years, as central banks thoroughly review the cross-border and economic implications of issuing digital currencies and technical design choices and operational complexities continue to present practical challenges. When it comes to cryptocurrencies, central banks continue to see these as niche products with no widespread use as a means of payment. Conversely, developments in stablecoins are being closely watched, given their potential for rapid adoption by consumers.
Keywords: International, Banking, CBDC, Fintech, Regtech, Digital Currency, Stablecoins, Cryptocurrencies, BIS
Previous ArticleBIS Surveys Central Banks on Issuance of Digital Currencies
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the final policy statement PS21/21 on the leverage ratio framework in the UK. PS21/21, which sets out the final policy of both the Financial Policy Committee (FPC) and PRA
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) proposed to amend Regulation B to implement changes to the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA) under Section 1071 of the Dodd-Frank Act.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) decided to maintain, at the 2019 levels, the buffer rates for the Other Systemically Important Institutions (O-SII) for another year, with no new rates to be set until December 2023.
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a progress report on implementation of its high-level recommendations for the regulation, supervision, and oversight of global stablecoin arrangements.
In a letter to the authorized deposit taking institutions, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) announced an increase in the minimum interest rate buffer it expects banks to use when assessing the serviceability of home loan applications.
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) are consulting on the preliminary guidance that clarifies that stablecoin arrangements should observe international standards for payment, clearing, and settlement systems.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) and the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) have set out their respective work priorities for 2022.
The Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA) updated the guidelines on supervisory reporting requirements under the reporting framework 3.0, in addition to the reporting module on leverage under the common reporting (COREP) framework.
The European Commission (EC) published the Implementing Decision 2021/1753 on the equivalence of supervisory and regulatory requirements of certain third countries and territories for the purposes of the treatment of exposures, in accordance with the Capital Requirements Regulation or CRR (575/2013).
EC published the Implementing Regulation 2021/1751, which lays down implementing technical standards on uniform formats and templates for notification of determination of the impracticability of including contractual recognition of write-down and conversion powers.