EIOPA published a paper that sets out the methodological principles of insurance stress testing with a focus on the liquidity component. The paper sets out methodological principles that can be used to design bottom-up stress test exercises to assess the vulnerability of insurers to liquidity shocks. This second methodological paper is part of a series of papers, has been published post a stakeholder consultation, and represents a further step in enhancement of the stress testing framework of EIOPA.
The Solvency II regime is designed to ensure a sound capital position of insurance and reinsurance undertakings but it does not include quantitative requirements and relative metrics with respect to liquidity position. The absence of a commonly agreed approach to assess the liquidity sources and needs of insurers and reinsurers, the subsequent absence of standardized metrics such as Solvency Capital Requirement (SCR) for the capital position, and the lack of a specifically designed data collection makes a methodological discussion on the liquidity stress test more difficult. Considering this, the paper proposes a definition of “liquidity position” and specific metrics to measure this position for an insurance and reinsurance undertaking. Amid the increasing consideration given to liquidity risk by the insurance industry and by the supervisors at European and global levels as well as in the absence of a commonly adopted liquidity framework for industry in EU, the paper presents a conceptual approach to the assessment of the liquidity position of insurers under adverse scenarios.
The paper provides the background on liquidity risk in the insurance industry as well as a definition of liquidity risk for the sector. The paper describes the micro- and macro-prudential objectives of liquidity stress test exercise and elaborates on the scope of a stress test exercise. It further describes the building blocks of a liquidity stress test exercise starting from the exposures of insurers to liquidity risk and the potential metrics to measure them. The paper also presents the proposed approach to the design of scenarios to be used in liquidity stress test, including narrative, shocks, and their calibration. The guidelines on the application of the shocks with some examples on potential analysis and presentation of results are also included in the paper. The conclusions are based on the current understanding and knowledge of the liquidity risk in the insurance industry. Hence, this might evolve in the future to reflect the experience gained in the assessment of such risk at European and global levels. Other topics such as climate change and multi-period framework for the bottom-up insurance stress testing will be published at a later stage.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Insurance, Stress Testing, Liquidity Risk, Solvency II, Liquidity Stress Test, EIOPA
Previous ArticleEC Consults on Crisis Management and Deposit Insurance Framework
Next ArticleBIS Launches Euro Green Bond Fund for Central Banks
The tech lab of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) selected three winning teams in a tech sprint designed to explore new technologies and techniques to help banks meet the needs of unbanked consumers.
PRA published a "Dear CEO" letter that sets out findings of a review on the reliability of regulatory reporting and reiterates the supervisory expectations on regulatory reporting.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) confirmed that its new data collection solution APRA Connect will go live on September 13, 2021.
The Federal Reserve System (FED) published a paper describing the landscape of partnerships between community banks and fintech companies.
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) has chosen four companies—Novantas Inc, Palantir Technologies Inc, PeerIQ, and S&P Global Market Intelligence LLC—to propose a pilot consisting of testing new reporting and analytical tools with a small group of FDIC-supervised institutions on a voluntary basis.
The Prudential Regulatory Authority (PRA), via the consultation paper CP18/21, proposed changes to the applicable requirements on the identification of material risk-takers for the purposes of the remuneration regime.
The Joint Committee of European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) published its second 2021 joint risk assessment report for the financial sector.
The International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) published a statement reiterating the importance of continued transition to robust alternative financial benchmarks—that is, risk-free rates—to mitigate potential risks arising from the cessation of LIBOR, including the USD LIBOR.
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FED) proposed revisions and three-year extension of the FRY-9 reports on financial statements for holding companies (OMB Control Number 7100-0128).
The Single Resolution Board (SRB) Chair, Elke König, published an article on improving the resolution framework for medium-size banks.