EIOPA published a paper that sets out the methodological principles of insurance stress testing with a focus on the liquidity component. The paper sets out methodological principles that can be used to design bottom-up stress test exercises to assess the vulnerability of insurers to liquidity shocks. This second methodological paper is part of a series of papers, has been published post a stakeholder consultation, and represents a further step in enhancement of the stress testing framework of EIOPA.
The Solvency II regime is designed to ensure a sound capital position of insurance and reinsurance undertakings but it does not include quantitative requirements and relative metrics with respect to liquidity position. The absence of a commonly agreed approach to assess the liquidity sources and needs of insurers and reinsurers, the subsequent absence of standardized metrics such as Solvency Capital Requirement (SCR) for the capital position, and the lack of a specifically designed data collection makes a methodological discussion on the liquidity stress test more difficult. Considering this, the paper proposes a definition of “liquidity position” and specific metrics to measure this position for an insurance and reinsurance undertaking. Amid the increasing consideration given to liquidity risk by the insurance industry and by the supervisors at European and global levels as well as in the absence of a commonly adopted liquidity framework for industry in EU, the paper presents a conceptual approach to the assessment of the liquidity position of insurers under adverse scenarios.
The paper provides the background on liquidity risk in the insurance industry as well as a definition of liquidity risk for the sector. The paper describes the micro- and macro-prudential objectives of liquidity stress test exercise and elaborates on the scope of a stress test exercise. It further describes the building blocks of a liquidity stress test exercise starting from the exposures of insurers to liquidity risk and the potential metrics to measure them. The paper also presents the proposed approach to the design of scenarios to be used in liquidity stress test, including narrative, shocks, and their calibration. The guidelines on the application of the shocks with some examples on potential analysis and presentation of results are also included in the paper. The conclusions are based on the current understanding and knowledge of the liquidity risk in the insurance industry. Hence, this might evolve in the future to reflect the experience gained in the assessment of such risk at European and global levels. Other topics such as climate change and multi-period framework for the bottom-up insurance stress testing will be published at a later stage.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Insurance, Stress Testing, Liquidity Risk, Solvency II, Liquidity Stress Test, EIOPA
Previous ArticleEC Consults on Crisis Management and Deposit Insurance Framework
Next ArticleBIS Launches Euro Green Bond Fund for Central Banks
The three European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) issued a letter to inform about delay in the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) mandate, along with a Call for Evidence on greenwashing practices.
The International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) of the IFRS Foundations made several announcements at COP27 and with respect to its work on the sustainability standards.
The International Organization for Securities Commissions (IOSCO), at COP27, outlined the regulatory priorities for sustainability disclosures, mitigation of greenwashing, and promotion of integrity in carbon markets.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) issued a statement in the context of COP27, clarified the operationalization of intermediate EU parent undertakings (IPUs) of third-country groups
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) published an annual report on its activities, a report on forward-looking work.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) finalized amendments to the capital framework, announced a review of the prudential framework for groups.
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hubs and several central banks are working together on various central bank digital currency (CBDC) pilots.
The European Central Bank (ECB) published the results of its thematic review, which shows that banks are still far from adequately managing climate and environmental risks.
Among its recent publications, the European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final standards and guidelines on interest rate risk arising from non-trading book activities (IRRBB)
The European Commission (EC) recently adopted regulations with respect to the calculation of own funds requirements for market risk, the prudential treatment of global systemically important institutions (G-SIIs)