SEC published two staff reports on the important work of the Office of Credit Ratings in examining and monitoring on the nationally recognized statistical rating organizations (NRSROs). Among others, the annual report covers developments in the competitive landscape for credit rating agencies. The reports indicate that the NRSROs made certain improvements in response to the examinations by staff and that the range of NRSROs issuing commentaries, along with the topics covered by those commentaries, has expanded.
The nine credit rating agencies registered in the US as NRSROs, as of January 15, 2020, are A.M. Best Rating Services Inc, DBRS Inc, Egan-Jones Ratings Company, Fitch Ratings Inc, HR Ratings de México S.A. de C.V., Japan Credit Rating Agency Ltd, Kroll Bond Rating Agency Inc, Moody’s Investors Service Inc, and S&P Global Ratings. With respect to these agencies, the report on NRSRO examinations summarizes the findings and recommendations within each of the eight review areas required by statute. These areas are adherence to policies, procedures, and methodologies; management of conflicts of interest; implementation of ethics policies; internal supervisory controls; governance; activities of designated compliance office; complaints; and post-employment factors.
The annual report on NRSROs, however, discusses the state of competition, transparency, and conflicts of interest among the firms, in addition to identifying any applicants for NRSRO registration. While the information reported by NRSROs indicates that Moody’s, S&P, and Fitch continue to account for the highest percentages of outstanding ratings, other information suggests that smaller NRSROs have gained market share in certain asset classes. A large proportion of the aggregate credit ratings reported to be outstanding were in the government securities category, which accounted for 79.0% of the credit ratings across all categories and is also the most concentrated rating category, with Moody’s and S&P accounting for 87.2% of all outstanding government ratings. A comparison of each NRSRO’s share of outstanding ratings over all the rating categories, including government securities, illustrates that there is less concentration in the non-government securities rating categories. S&P’s and Moody’s percentage share of all outstanding ratings declines by 14.5 and 5.6 percentage points, respectively, when government securities are excluded. Fitch’s percentage share of outstanding ratings, however, increases by 7.2 percentage points when government securities are excluded.
Keywords: Americas, US, Banking, Insurance, Securities, NRSRO, Credit Rating Agencies, Credit Risk, SEC
Previous ArticleOSFI Assesses Impact of Revised Guideline on Mortgage Underwriting
EBA finalized the two sets of draft regulatory technical standards on the identification of material risk-takers and on the classes of instruments used for remuneration under the Investment Firms Directive (IFD).
EC published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, a notification that the European Court of Auditors (ECA) has published a special report on resolution planning in the Single Resolution Mechanism.
BoE published a scenario against which it will be stress testing banks in 2021, in addition to setting out the key elements of the 2021 stress test, guidance on the 2021 stress test, and the variable paths for the 2021 stress test.
PRA published a consultation paper (CP3/21) proposes rules regarding the timing of identity verification required for eligibility of depositor protection under the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS).
FSB published the work program for 2021, which reflects a strategic shift in priorities in the COVID-19 environment.
FCA announced that 50% firms have started using the new data collection platform RegData, which is slated to replace the existing platform known Gabriel.
Bundesbank published Version 5.0 of the derivation rules for completeness check at the form level, with respect to the data quality of the European harmonized reporting system.
FED finalized a rule that updates capital planning requirements to reflect the new framework from 2019 that sorts large banks into categories, with requirements that are tailored to the risks of each category.
ECB published results of the quarterly lending survey conducted on 143 banks in the euro area.
ESAs published the final draft implementing technical standards on reporting of intra-group transactions and risk concentration of financial conglomerates subject to the supplementary supervision in EU.