ISDA published a set of best practices for central counterparties (CCPs) to ensure greater consistency in risk practices at CCPs across the globe. The paper highlights steps that can be taken to minimize the potential for a member default to impact other members and the financial system as a whole, except in an extreme stress event.
The paper recommends that CCP risk management decisions be based on the risk profile of a product, rather than on whether a derivative is an exchange-traded or over-the-counter (OTC) product. Other best practice recommendations include ensuring CCPs have risk controls and margin requirements that adapt to concentration, liquidity, member credit quality, and wrong-way risk in a member’s portfolio. CCPs should also have effective and transparent default management processes and robust membership criteria. The paper sets out the following best practices:
- Risk management must be aligned with the underlying risk of a given product.
- CCPs must have robust membership requirements that are regularly reviewed.
- Products cleared by a CCP must be sufficiently standardized and liquid.
- CCPs must ensure they have a sufficient number of members to mutualize risk.
- Margin must be calculated consistently across all products, taking account of concentration, liquidity, and wrong-way risk.
- Controls should be used to protect against erroneous trades and the build-up of concentrated positions.
- Key documentation must be disclosed, including margin and stress testing models and default management procedures.
- The size of the default fund should be aligned with key best practices, with limits on the portion of the default fund that can be consumed by any one member.
- The default management process should include key elements—for instance, ensuring sufficient participation in auctions—and should be tested regularly.
- Parties underwriting the counterparty risk of a CCP should be part of its governance.
Keywords: International, Securities, CCP, OTC Derivatives, Systemic Risk, Margin Requirements, ISDA
Sam leads the quantitative research team within the CreditEdge™ research group. In this role, he develops novel risk and forecasting solutions for financial institutions while providing thought leadership on related trends in global financial markets.
Previous ArticleHKMA Publishes Its Work Priorities for the Banking Sector in 2019
EU published Directive 2021/338, which amends the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID) II and the Capital Requirements Directives (CRD 4 and 5) to facilitate recovery from the COVID-19 crisis.
The Standing Committee of the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) recommended that a systemic risk buffer level of 4.5% for domestic exposures can be considered appropriate for addressing the identified systemic risks to the stability of the financial system in Norway.
In a recent statement, PRA clarified its approach to the application of certain EU regulatory technical standards and EBA guidelines on standardized and internal ratings-based approaches to credit risk, following the end of the Brexit transition.
In a recently published letter addressed to the G20 finance ministers and central bank governors, the FSB Chair Randal K. Quarles has set out the key FSB priorities for 2021.
EU published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, a corrigendum to the revised Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR2 or Regulation 2019/876).
ESAs published a joint supervisory statement on the effective and consistent application and on national supervision of the regulation on sustainability-related disclosures in the financial services sector (SFDR).
EC published a public consultation on the review of crisis management and deposit insurance frameworks in EU.
HKMA announced that enhancements will be made to the Special 100% Loan Guarantee of the SME Financing Guarantee Scheme (SFGS) and the application period will be extended to December 31, 2021.
EBA launched consultations on the regulatory and implementing technical standards on cooperation and information exchange between competent authorities involved in prudential supervision of investment firms.
BoE issued a letter to the CEOs of eight major UK banks that are in scope of the first Resolvability Assessment Framework (RAF) reporting and disclosure cycle.