HKMA published proposals for making rules related to contractual stays on termination rights in financial contracts for authorized institutions under FIRO or the Financial Institutions (Resolution) Ordinance (Cap. 628). The proposals encompass the rules that HKMA intends to make in its capacity as a resolution authority. Comments are requested by March 22, 2020.
FIRO, which came into effect in 2017, establishes a cross-sectoral resolution regime for financial institutions that is in line with the international standards. Disorderly termination of contracts by counterparties of a financial institution in a resolution would cause significant contagion effect to the financial markets. FIRO contains a provision that provides a resolution authority with the power to suspend (that is, stay), for a specified period, the termination right of a counterparty to a qualifying contract under certain circumstances. For ensuring the effective implementation of this provision, a resolution authority may make rules that impose a requirement for contractual recognition of the temporary stay power under FIRO
The consultation sets out detailed proposals for the stay rules HKMA intends to make, which will require the entities subject to the rules to adopt appropriate provisions in certain financial contracts to the effect that the parties to the contracts agree to be bound by a temporary stay that may be imposed by HKMA under FIRO. The proposals are designed to be aligned with the relevant principles set by FSB. In drawing up the proposals, HKMA has taken these principles into account and made reference to the approaches adopted in key jurisdictions.
The consultation paper sets out the relevant FIRO provisions and the international context. It also sets out the proposed scope of the stay rules, operational and implementation matters in relation to the stay rules, along with the next steps intended to be taken in relation to the stay rules. The Annex to the consultation paper sets out the full list of consultation questions. Subject to outcome of the public consultation, the intention is to introduce the rules as subsidiary legislation under FIRO into the Legislative Council for negative vetting in the 2020-2021 legislative session.
Comment Due Date: March 22, 2020
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Hong Kong, Banking, Securities, Stay Rules, FIRO, Termination of Contracts, Financial Contract, Resolution Framework, FSB, HKMA
Previous ArticleISDA Responds to FASB Proposal on Derivatives and Hedging Standard
PRA published the policy statement PS8/21, which contains the final supervisory statement SS3/21 on the PRA approach to supervision of the new and growing non-systemic banks in UK.
EBA published a report that sets out the final draft regulatory technical standards specifying the conditions according to which consolidation shall be carried out in line with Article 18 of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
EBA updated the list of other systemically important institutions (O-SIIs) in EU.
BCBS published two reports that discuss transmission channels of climate-related risks to the banking system and the measurement methodologies of climate-related financial risks.
UK Authorities (FCA and PRA) welcomed the findings of FSB peer review on the implementation of financial sector remuneration reforms in the UK.
PRA and FCA jointly issued a letter that highlights risks associated with the increasing volumes of deposits that are placed with banks and building societies via deposit aggregators and how to mitigate these risks.
MFSA announced that amendments to the Banking Act, Subsidiary Legislation, and Banking Rules will be issued in the coming months, to transpose the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5) into the national regulatory framework.
EC finalized the Delegated Regulation 2021/598 that supplements the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR or 575/2013) and lays out the regulatory technical standards for assigning risk-weights to specialized lending exposures.
OSFI launched a consultation to explore ways to enhance the OSFI assurance over capital, leverage, and liquidity returns for banks and insurers, given the increasing complexity arising from the evolving regulatory reporting framework due to IFRS 17 (Insurance Contracts) standard and Basel III reforms.
ECB published results of the benchmarking analysis of the recovery plan cycle for 2019.