HKMA published proposals for making rules related to contractual stays on termination rights in financial contracts for authorized institutions under FIRO or the Financial Institutions (Resolution) Ordinance (Cap. 628). The proposals encompass the rules that HKMA intends to make in its capacity as a resolution authority. Comments are requested by March 22, 2020.
FIRO, which came into effect in 2017, establishes a cross-sectoral resolution regime for financial institutions that is in line with the international standards. Disorderly termination of contracts by counterparties of a financial institution in a resolution would cause significant contagion effect to the financial markets. FIRO contains a provision that provides a resolution authority with the power to suspend (that is, stay), for a specified period, the termination right of a counterparty to a qualifying contract under certain circumstances. For ensuring the effective implementation of this provision, a resolution authority may make rules that impose a requirement for contractual recognition of the temporary stay power under FIRO
The consultation sets out detailed proposals for the stay rules HKMA intends to make, which will require the entities subject to the rules to adopt appropriate provisions in certain financial contracts to the effect that the parties to the contracts agree to be bound by a temporary stay that may be imposed by HKMA under FIRO. The proposals are designed to be aligned with the relevant principles set by FSB. In drawing up the proposals, HKMA has taken these principles into account and made reference to the approaches adopted in key jurisdictions.
The consultation paper sets out the relevant FIRO provisions and the international context. It also sets out the proposed scope of the stay rules, operational and implementation matters in relation to the stay rules, along with the next steps intended to be taken in relation to the stay rules. The Annex to the consultation paper sets out the full list of consultation questions. Subject to outcome of the public consultation, the intention is to introduce the rules as subsidiary legislation under FIRO into the Legislative Council for negative vetting in the 2020-2021 legislative session.
Comment Due Date: March 22, 2020
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Hong Kong, Banking, Securities, Stay Rules, FIRO, Termination of Contracts, Financial Contract, Resolution Framework, FSB, HKMA
Previous ArticleISDA Responds to FASB Proposal on Derivatives and Hedging Standard
IAIS published technical specifications, questionnaires, and templates for 2020 Insurance Capital Standard (ICS) and Aggregation Method data collections.
BIS announced that it will establish new Innovation Hub centers across Europe and in North America in cooperation with member central banks.
FED updated the reporting form for FR 2052a, which is used to monitor the overall liquidity profile of certain supervised institutions.
PRA published a statement that sets out its views on certain amendments made to Capital Requirements Regulations (CRR and CRR2) via EU Regulation 2020/873 (CRR "Quick Fix"), including some guidance for firms.
The Climate Financial Risk Forum (CFRF), which is a joint climate risk forum of FCA and PRA, published a guide written by the industry for the industry to help firms approach and address climate-related financial risks.
IAIS published an application paper on liquidity risk management for insurers.
EBA published its response to the EC consultation on a new Digital Finance Strategy for Europe.
EIOPA responded to the EC consultation on a new digital finance strategy for Europe.
ESMA published its response to the EC consultation on the new digital finance strategy for EU.
FSB published, for consultation, a report on evaluation of the too-big-to-fail (TBTF) reforms for systemically important banks.