The working group on euro risk-free rates published a paper on the guiding principles for fallback provisions in new contracts for euro-denominated cash products. This working group is an industry-led group established in 2018 by ECB, the Belgian Financial Services and Markets Authority (FSMA), ESMA, and EC. Its main tasks are to identify and recommend the risk-free rates to serve as a basis for an alternative to the current benchmarks used in a variety of financial instruments and contracts in the euro area. The paper offers an overview of the legal frameworks and market practices applicable to cash products, such as mortgages, loans and bonds, that reference EURIBOR and EONIA, with a focus on fallback clauses.
The paper emphasizes that it is important for market participants to prepare for the transition to risk-free rates. During 2019, the working group intends to recommend more detailed fallback language to be used in legacy and new euro-denominated contracts. In addition, the working group will consider best practices for contracts to ensure that new contracts are robust and resilient to the possible material alteration or cessation of the underlying benchmark.
Major reference interest rates play a pivotal role in the global financial system. They are widely used in contracts for derivatives, loans, and securities. They are also used by market participants to value financial instruments and by investment funds as benchmarks for assessing their performance, among other things. Declining activity in the underlying interbank unsecured funding markets and challenges to the sustainability of panels contributing to these benchmark rates pose potentially serious risks to individual users of the rates and to the financial system more broadly. Therefore, in 2014, FSB had published its report on reforming major interest rate benchmarks, which sets out a series of recommendations to strengthen the existing benchmarks by underpinning them, to the greatest extent possible, with real transaction data and to develop alternative, nearly risk-free reference rates.
In addition, Principle 13 of the “Principles for Financial Benchmarks,” which were published by IOSCO, states that users should be encouraged to take steps to make sure that contracts or other financial instruments that reference a benchmark have robust fallback provisions in the event of material change to, or cessation of, the referenced benchmark. Moreover, IOSCO also published a statement on matters to consider in the use of financial benchmarks, including contingency planning, particularly for scenarios in which a benchmark is no longer available. In Europe, the Benchmarks Regulation recently introduced new requirements for benchmark administrators, supervised contributors, and supervised entities using benchmarks, including requirements for the use of fallback provisions in contracts.
At the request of the FSB’s Official Sector Steering Group, the International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. (ISDA) is considering fallbacks for derivatives referencing EUR LIBOR, EURIBOR and other key interest rate benchmarks (ISDA IBOR fallbacks). In addition, ISDA has recently published the ISDA Benchmarks Supplement, which market participants may incorporate to provide primary fallbacks for derivatives in the event of cessation of an index until such time as the ISDA IBOR fallbacks are incorporated into the terms of transactions (upon which the ISDA Benchmarks Supplement provisions will be subordinated to the ISDA IBOR fallbacks in relation to the relevant IBOR). The ISDA Benchmarks Supplement also provides primary fallbacks in the event that a benchmark is not authorized or fails to maintain authorization under the EU Benchmarks Regulation, resulting in the parties to the relevant transaction (or the calculation agent, if different) being prohibited from performing their obligations under that transaction.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Securities, Fallback Provisions, RFR, Euro-denominated Cash Products, Interest Rate Benchmark, FSB, IOSCO, ECB
EIOPA submitted—to the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union, and EC—its 2020, fifth, and last annual report on long-term guarantee measures and measures on equity risk.
The BIS Innovation Hub Swiss Centre, SNB, and the financial infrastructure operator SIX announced the successful completion of a joint proof-of-concept (PoC) experiment as part of the Project Helvetia.
EBA published the final draft regulatory technical standards for calculation of own funds requirements for market risk, under the standardized and internal model approaches of the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book (FRTB) framework.
EIOPA published discussion paper on a methodology for the potential inclusion of climate change in the Solvency II (sometimes also written as SII) standard formula when calculating natural catastrophe underwriting risk.
EU published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, corrigenda to the Directive and the Regulation on the prudential requirements and supervision of investment firms.
MAS proposed amendments to certain regulations, notices, and guidelines arising from the Banking (Amendment) Act 2020.
PRA published a statement that explains when to expect further information on the PRA approach to transposing the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5), including its approach to revisions to the definition of capital for Pillar 2A.
RBNZ launched consultations on the scope of the Insurance Prudential Supervision Act (IPSA) 2010 and on the associated Insurance Solvency Standards.
SRB published the work program for 2021-2023, setting out a roadmap to further operationalize the Single Resolution Fund and to achieve robust resolvability of banks under its remit over the next three years.
EIOPA is consulting on the relevant ratios to be mandatorily disclosed by insurers and reinsurers falling within the scope of the Non-Financial Reporting Directive as well as on the methodologies to build these ratios.