General Information & Client Service
  • Americas: +1.212.553.1653
  • Asia: +852.3551.3077
  • China: +86.10.6319.6580
  • EMEA: +44.20.7772.5454
  • Japan: +81.3.5408.4100
Media Relations
  • New York: +1.212.553.0376
  • London: +44.20.7772.5456
  • Hong Kong: +852.3758.1350
  • Tokyo: +813.5408.4110
  • Sydney: +61.2.9270.8141
  • Mexico City: +001.888.779.5833
  • Buenos Aires: +0800.666.3506
  • São Paulo: +0800.891.2518
January 21, 2019

ECB published its opinion (CON/2019/2) on CBM’s supervision of credit reference agencies and its oversight of payment services. The opinion was issued in response to a request from CBM for an opinion on a draft law amending the CBM Act and on a draft Directive No 15 on the supervision of credit reference agencies. CBM also informed ECB that it intends to amend Directive No 14 on the Central Credit Register, along with the draft law amending the CBM Act and the draft directive on credit reference agencies, collectively referred to as the “draft law.”

The ECB opinion focuses on certain areas of the draft law of interest to ECB, including CBM's oversight of payment services (Section 3), its new supervisory powers with respect to credit reference agencies (Section 4), and its access to the Central Credit Register (Section 5). Finally, the opinion examines the new tasks conferred on CBM against the prohibition of monetary financing (Section 6). The definition of credit reference agencies pursuant to the draft law falls outside the scope of Credit Rating Agencies Regulation (Regulation No 1060/2009) because this regulation does not apply to credit scores, credit scoring systems, or similar assessments related to obligations arising from consumer, commercial, or industrial relationships. As credit reference agencies fall outside the scope of this regulation, ESMA would not have supervisory powers over such entities. In the vast majority of member states, credit reference agencies remain unregulated, except for data protection aspects. 

ECB welcomes the provisions of the draft law extending access to the Central Credit Register to Union institutions, which create databases comparable to the Register and conclude reciprocity arrangements with CBM, and any other institution as CBM may consider necessary. ECB welcomes that the draft law provides that CBM may provide access to the information held in the Central Credit Register to any other institution that CBM may consider necessary. ECB considers that, if necessary for the fulfillment of its tasks, this provision could give ECB an additional legal basis for accessing the Register.

ECB notes that the draft law does not confer genuinely new tasks on CBM, but rather extends CBM’s powers to facilitate the exercise of a task already assigned to it. ECB underlines that a proposed conferral of new tasks on a national central bank of the European System of Central Banks (ESCB) must be assessed against the criteria for determining what constitutes a government task from the perspective of the monetary financing prohibition laid down in Article 123 of the Treaty. While the new task conferred on CBM regarding the supervision of credit reference agencies is not among the tasks conferred on ECB and national central banks by the Treaty and the Statute of ESCB, this task is not atypical of the national central bank tasks in those member states that have chosen to regulate and supervise credit reference agencies with respect to their credit scoring. Moreover, it is common for national central banks to be involved in activities related to the management of credit risk. As CBM’s new task is furthermore not discharged on behalf of, and in the exclusive interest of, the government, CBM’s new supervisory task in relation to credit reference agencies does not constitute a government task.


Related Links

Keywords: Europe, Malta, Banking, Securities, Credit Reference Agencies, Opinion, Central Credit Register, CBM Act, CON/2019/2, CBM, ECB

Related Articles

EBA Single Rulebook Q&A: Fourth Update for March 2019

EBA published answers to five questions under the Single Rulebook question and answer (Q&A) updates for this week.

March 22, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

ECB Updates Validation Checks and List of Identifiers Under AnaCredit

ECB updated the AnaCredit validation checks (Version 1.4) and the list of national identifiers (version 2.4) for AnaCredit reporting.

March 21, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

BCBS Publishes Results of the Basel III Monitoring Exercise

BCBS published results of the Basel III monitoring exercise based on data as of June 30, 2018.

March 20, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

EBA, FCA, and PRA Agree on MoU Template for Supervisory Cooperation

EBA, FCA, and PRA announced that they have agreed on a template for the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) that sets out the expectations for supervisory cooperation and information-sharing arrangements between UK and EU/European Economic Area national authorities.

March 20, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

HKMA Publishes CoP on Loss-Absorbing Capacity Requirements of Banks

HKMA issued, in relation to the Financial Institutions Resolution (Loss-Absorbing Capacity Requirements—Banking Sector) Rules (LAC Rules) a chapter of a code of practice (LAC CoP) under section 196 of the Financial Institutions Resolution Ordinance (FIRO).

March 20, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

EBA Publishes Reports Monitoring the Implementation of Basel III in EU

EBA published two reports measuring the impact of implementing the final Basel III reforms and monitoring the implementation of liquidity measures in EU.

March 20, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

BCBS Publishes Results of Survey on Proportionality in Bank Regulation

BCBS published a report presenting the results of a survey conducted on proportionality practices in bank regulation and supervision.

March 19, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

US Agencies Adopt Interim Rule to Facilitate Transfers of Legacy Swaps

US Agencies (FCA, FDIC, FED, FHFA, and OCC) are adopting and inviting comments on an interim final rule.

March 19, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

EBA Updates List of Other Systemically Important Institutions in EU

EBA updated the 2018 list of other systemically important institutions (O-SIIs) in EU. The list also reflects the additional capital buffers that the relevant authorities have set for the identified O-SIIs.

March 19, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

HKMA Expects Banks to Manage Risks Related to Crypto-Asset Exposures

HKMA issued a statement announcing that it expects authorized institutions to take note of the BCBS statement on crypto-assets and its prudential expectations.

March 18, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 2780