EC published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, a notification that the European Court of Auditors (ECA) has published a special report on resolution planning in the Single Resolution Mechanism. ECA has conducted a second audit to inform policymakers and legislators about the state of preparedness of the Single Resolution Mechanism. The auditors found that the Single Resolution Mechanism has made progress over the last years, but some key elements are missing and further steps are needed in resolution planning for banks. The review concludes that SRB should put in place all relevant policies shaping resolution actions and address weaknesses in the quality, timeliness, and consistency of its own resolution planning. Other essential issues, such as funding in resolution and harmonization of national insolvency proceedings for banks, also need to be resolved by the legislators.
ECA has conducted this second audit to address the oversight of resolution plans of SRB for less significant banks and as a follow-up of the results of the previous audit. To that end, ECA examined whether the policy framework and organizational setup were appropriate and progress had been made in terms of the quality and timing of the resolution plans adopted. The audit work took place from April 2019 to January 2020. In its review, ECA found that the policies did not yet address all relevant areas or revealed weaknesses. The policies (with some exceptions) were not addressed to the national resolution authorities for banks under their remit until August 2020, but they could serve as a point of reference.
The report notes that the choice of resolution tool and its effectiveness depend, among other things, on whether the substantive impediments to a bank’s resolvability have been addressed or removed. Yet, the auditors observe that SRB has refrained from determining any such impediments to date, thus failing to comply with the harmonized rules. Also, the rules on burden-sharing vary according to whether a bank is resolved or receives State aid in the context of insolvency proceedings. To enhance the preparedness of the Single Resolution Mechanism, ECA has recommended SRB to:
- Improve its set of policies that guide the resolution planning of Single Resolution Mechanism. SRB should establish the missing policies, resolve weaknesses in existing policies and/or their application, and require internal resolution teams to apply a comply-or-explain approach when deviating from the policies established in the resolution planning manual.
- Ensure timely adoption and full compliance of resolution plans with legal requirements. In this regard, SRB should improve the quality of the plans to achieve full compliance with the Single Rulebook as well as streamline and address the time-consuming nature of procedures, in an effort to not compromise the objective of adopting all plans in a one-year cycle.
- Improve the organizational setup of the Single Resolution Mechanism. To improve the oversight of resolution planning at the national resolution authority level, SRB should assign sufficient staff and express clear views on the quality of resolution plans for less significant banks, where it detects shortcomings.
- Invite the legislators to set up objective and quantified criteria for timely supervisory action. SRB and EC should approach the legislators and ECB and advocate for objective and quantified thresholds for triggering early intervention measures and reaching the decision that a bank is failing or likely to fail.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Resolution Planning, Resolution Framework, Single Resolution Mechanism, SRB, ECA
A well-recognized researcher in the field; offers many years of experience in the real estate ﬁnance industry, and leads research efforts in expanding credit risk analytics to commercial real estate.
Previous ArticleFIN-FSA Makes Several Regulatory Announcements
EU published Directive 2021/338, which amends the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID) II and the Capital Requirements Directives (CRD 4 and 5) to facilitate recovery from the COVID-19 crisis.
The Standing Committee of the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) recommended that a systemic risk buffer level of 4.5% for domestic exposures can be considered appropriate for addressing the identified systemic risks to the stability of the financial system in Norway.
In a recent statement, PRA clarified its approach to the application of certain EU regulatory technical standards and EBA guidelines on standardized and internal ratings-based approaches to credit risk, following the end of the Brexit transition.
In a recently published letter addressed to the G20 finance ministers and central bank governors, the FSB Chair Randal K. Quarles has set out the key FSB priorities for 2021.
EU published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, a corrigendum to the revised Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR2 or Regulation 2019/876).
ESAs published a joint supervisory statement on the effective and consistent application and on national supervision of the regulation on sustainability-related disclosures in the financial services sector (SFDR).
EC published a public consultation on the review of crisis management and deposit insurance frameworks in EU.
HKMA announced that enhancements will be made to the Special 100% Loan Guarantee of the SME Financing Guarantee Scheme (SFGS) and the application period will be extended to December 31, 2021.
EBA launched consultations on the regulatory and implementing technical standards on cooperation and information exchange between competent authorities involved in prudential supervision of investment firms.
BoE issued a letter to the CEOs of eight major UK banks that are in scope of the first Resolvability Assessment Framework (RAF) reporting and disclosure cycle.