BoE published a scenario against which it will be stress testing banks in 2021, in addition to setting out the key elements of the 2021 stress test, guidance on the 2021 stress test, and the variable paths for the 2021 stress test. BoE also published the data templates and dictionary for the solvency stress testing and taxonomy for the XBRL concurrent stress testing exercise for 2021. The 2021 stress test will cover the eight listed major banks and building societies: Barclays, HSBC Holdings, Lloyds Banking Group, Nationwide, NatWest Group, Santander UK Group Holdings, Standard Chartered, and Virgin Money UK. Although ring-fenced subgroups are not in scope for the 2021 stress test, BoE expects to include the ring-fenced subgroups of stress test participants in the 2022 test.
The 2021 solvency stress test will assess the major UK banks and building societies against a UK and a global scenario that reflects a severe path for the current macroeconomic outlook. The 2021 solvency stress test will test banks’ end-2020 balance sheets to a scenario similar to that generated by the reverse stress test. The timetable for the 2021 solvency stress test will be staggered. Participating banks will be required to submit projections for credit impairments and credit risk-weighted assets in April, rather than the usual timing of June. This will help inform further analysis by BoE in the first half of the year. The additional stressed projections will be submitted in June, as usual, with bank-specific results published in the fourth quarter of 2021. To help facilitate this change to the usual timetable, and in recognition of ongoing operational challenges within participating banks, banks will not be requested to submit baseline projections and the ring-fenced subgroups of stress-test participants will not be included in the 2021 stress test. Although the qualitative review will continue to be an important component of the 2021 stress test, the scope of this year’s exercise will be adapted according to the situation.
The results of the 2021 solvency stress test will act as a cross-check on the Financial Policy Committee (FPC) judgment of how severe the current stress would need to be to jeopardize resilience of banks and challenge their ability to absorb losses and continue to lend. The test will, therefore, cross-check the judgment that the banking system is resilient to a reasonable worst-case stress in the current environment. It will also support the PRA objective of promoting the safety and soundness of PRA-regulated firms. The outcome of the test will be used to update the FPC judgments about the most appropriate ways in which the banking system can continue to support the economy through the stress. It will also be used as an input into the transition of PRA back to its standard approach to capital-setting and shareholder distributions through 2021.
- Press Release
- Key Elements of Stress Test
- Guidance for Stress Test
- Variable Paths for Stress Test (XLSX)
- Stress Testing Scenarios, Templates, and Taxonomy
Keywords: Europe, UK, Banking, Stress Testing, Credit Risk, 2021 Stress Test, Basel, BoE
In a letter addressed to the industry, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) set out an updated schedule of policy priorities for the banking, insurance, and superannuation industries.
The European Commission (EC) adopted a comprehensive review package of Solvency II rules in the European Union.
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) issued Versions 1.0 of the "Earnings" and "Regulatory Reporting" booklets of the Comptroller's Handbook.
The European Central Bank (ECB) published results of its economy-wide climate stress test, which aimed to assess the resilience of non-financial corporates and euro area banks to climate risks.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published a report on the use of digital platforms in the banking and payments sector in European Union.
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) published updates on the policy measures that were announced in context of the ongoing pandemic.
The International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA), along with several other associations, submitted a joint response to the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) consultation on preliminary proposals for the prudential treatment of cryptoasset exposures.
BIS published the September issue of the Quarterly Review, which contains special features that analyze the rapid rise in equity funding for financial technology firms, the effectiveness of policy measures in response to pandemic, and the evolution of international banking.
The Basel Committee for Banking Supervision (BCBS) met in September 2021 and reviewed climate-related financial risks, discussed impact of digitalization, and welcomed efforts by the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) Foundation to develop a common set of sustainability reporting standards
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) issued a Cease and Desist Order against MUFG Union Bank for deficiencies in technology and operational risk governance.