BoE published a scenario against which it will be stress testing banks in 2021, in addition to setting out the key elements of the 2021 stress test, guidance on the 2021 stress test, and the variable paths for the 2021 stress test. BoE also published the data templates and dictionary for the solvency stress testing and taxonomy for the XBRL concurrent stress testing exercise for 2021. The 2021 stress test will cover the eight listed major banks and building societies: Barclays, HSBC Holdings, Lloyds Banking Group, Nationwide, NatWest Group, Santander UK Group Holdings, Standard Chartered, and Virgin Money UK. Although ring-fenced subgroups are not in scope for the 2021 stress test, BoE expects to include the ring-fenced subgroups of stress test participants in the 2022 test.
The 2021 solvency stress test will assess the major UK banks and building societies against a UK and a global scenario that reflects a severe path for the current macroeconomic outlook. The 2021 solvency stress test will test banks’ end-2020 balance sheets to a scenario similar to that generated by the reverse stress test. The timetable for the 2021 solvency stress test will be staggered. Participating banks will be required to submit projections for credit impairments and credit risk-weighted assets in April, rather than the usual timing of June. This will help inform further analysis by BoE in the first half of the year. The additional stressed projections will be submitted in June, as usual, with bank-specific results published in the fourth quarter of 2021. To help facilitate this change to the usual timetable, and in recognition of ongoing operational challenges within participating banks, banks will not be requested to submit baseline projections and the ring-fenced subgroups of stress-test participants will not be included in the 2021 stress test. Although the qualitative review will continue to be an important component of the 2021 stress test, the scope of this year’s exercise will be adapted according to the situation.
The results of the 2021 solvency stress test will act as a cross-check on the Financial Policy Committee (FPC) judgment of how severe the current stress would need to be to jeopardize resilience of banks and challenge their ability to absorb losses and continue to lend. The test will, therefore, cross-check the judgment that the banking system is resilient to a reasonable worst-case stress in the current environment. It will also support the PRA objective of promoting the safety and soundness of PRA-regulated firms. The outcome of the test will be used to update the FPC judgments about the most appropriate ways in which the banking system can continue to support the economy through the stress. It will also be used as an input into the transition of PRA back to its standard approach to capital-setting and shareholder distributions through 2021.
- Press Release
- Key Elements of Stress Test
- Guidance for Stress Test
- Variable Paths for Stress Test (XLSX)
- Stress Testing Scenarios, Templates, and Taxonomy
Keywords: Europe, UK, Banking, Stress Testing, Credit Risk, 2021 Stress Test, Basel, BoE
Previous ArticleFED Releases Results of Second Round of Bank Stress Test for 2020
BIS published a paper that provides an overview on the use of big data and machine learning in the central bank community.
APRA finalized the reporting standard ARS 115.0 on capital adequacy with respect to the standardized measurement approach to operational risk for authorized deposit-taking institutions in Australia.
ECB published a guide that outlines the principles and methods for calculating the penalties for regulatory breaches of prudential requirements by banks.
MAS and The Association of Banks in Singapore (ABS) jointly issued a paper that sets out good practices for the management of operational and other risks stemming from new work arrangements adopted by financial institutions amid the COVID-19 pandemic.
ACPR announced that a new data collection application, called DLPP (Datalake for Prudential), for collecting banking and insurance prudential data will go into production on April 12, 2021.
BCB announced that the Financial Stability Committee decided to maintain the countercyclical capital buffer (CCyB) for Brazil at 0%, at least until the end of 2021.
EIOPA has launched a European-wide comparative study on non-life underwriting risk in internal models, also kicking-off of the data collection phase.
SRB published an overview of the resolution tools available in the Banking Union and their impact on a bank’s ability to maintain continuity of access to financial market infrastructure services in resolution.
EBA is consulting on the implementing technical standards for Pillar 3 disclosures on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risks, as set out in requirements under Article 449a of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
ESAs Issue Advice on KPIs on Sustainability for Nonfinancial Reporting