Bundesbank published Version 5.0 of the derivation rules for completeness check at the form level, with respect to the data quality of the European harmonized reporting system. The requirements apply to all credit institutions within the meaning of the Capital Requirement Regulation (CRR). Changes resulting from the latest taxonomy version 2.10 have been highlighted in red. Changes due to the previous taxonomy versions 2.9 and 2.8 have been marked in blue or green font, respectively. The changes can be found in the worksheets that are highlighted in yellow in the Excel document on derivation rules.
ECB has formulated data quality requirements for uniform supervision in the Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM). These requirements are being checked against five criteria: punctuality, completeness, correctness and consistency, continuity, and plausibility. The completeness check is based on the existence of all modules and forms to be submitted. The completeness of a report depends on factors specific to the institution and is, therefore, assessed on an individual basis. In addition to the checks at the module and form levels, completeness is also checked at the data point level.
Related Links (in German)
Keywords: Europe, Germany, Banking, Reporting, Derivation Rules, SSM, CRR, Taxonomy 2.10, Taxonomy 2.9, Bundesbank
Previous ArticlePRA Proposes Rules on Identity Verification of Depositor Protection
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published a new set of frequently asked questions (FAQs) to clarify the regulatory capital treatment of investments in the overseas deposit-taking and insurance subsidiaries.
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) issued a circular, for all authorized institutions, to confirm its support of an information note that sets out various options available in the loan market for replacing USD LIBOR with the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR).
The tech lab of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) selected three winning teams in a tech sprint designed to explore new technologies and techniques to help banks meet the needs of unbanked consumers.
The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) launched a consultation on the standards for market risk capital and the associated reporting requirements for banks incorporated in Singapore.
PRA published a "Dear CEO" letter that sets out findings of a review on the reliability of regulatory reporting and reiterates the supervisory expectations on regulatory reporting.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) confirmed that its new data collection solution APRA Connect will go live on September 13, 2021.
The Federal Reserve System (FED) published a paper describing the landscape of partnerships between community banks and fintech companies.
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) has chosen four companies—Novantas Inc, Palantir Technologies Inc, PeerIQ, and S&P Global Market Intelligence LLC—to propose a pilot consisting of testing new reporting and analytical tools with a small group of FDIC-supervised institutions on a voluntary basis.
The Prudential Regulatory Authority (PRA), via the consultation paper CP18/21, proposed changes to the applicable requirements on the identification of material risk-takers for the purposes of the remuneration regime.
The Joint Committee of European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) published its second 2021 joint risk assessment report for the financial sector.