ESAs published the final draft implementing technical standards on reporting of intra-group transactions and risk concentration of financial conglomerates subject to the supplementary supervision in EU. The standards are intended for the supplementary supervision of credit institutions, insurance undertakings, and investment firms under the Financial Conglomerates Directive or FICOD. The implementing standards provide the foundation for harmonization of reporting, with one set of templates, along with the common definitions and instructions to fill in the templates, as set out in the Annex to the implementing standards. As mentioned in the report of ESAs, the implementing technical standards will enter into force on January 01, 2022.
The draft implementing standards set out harmonized templates for the reporting of intra-group transactions and risk concentration by financial conglomerates. For the purpose of the reporting, the Financial Conglomerates Directive does not specify a default threshold for the determination of the significance of risk concentrations to be reported. The threshold may be introduced by the coordinator, in coordination with the relevant competent authorities and the conglomerate. The published Templates FC07 and FC08 are based on all the exposures of the conglomerate. The coordinator may define the number of items reported under the risk concentration templates. The decision regarding the frequency of the reporting (for example, quarterly, semi-annually, yearly) is within the remit of coordinator and should be notified to the financial conglomerate in due course. Yet, as required by the Directive, the reporting shall be addressed at least annually to the coordinator in an electronic format. For annual reporting, reference date should be December 31, unless the financial conglomerate uses a different reporting date.
The harmonized templates aim to align reporting under the Financial Conglomerates Directive to enhance supervisory convergence on group-specific risks, particularly the contagion risk. The mixed financial holding companies are prone to contagion effects and defaults arising from undertakings of the group and spread risks within the financial conglomerate. Significant transactions between the mixed financial holding companies and non-regulated entities are, therefore, an important element for the ability of the supervisor to identify at a group-wide level the possible contagion effects, circumvention of sectoral rules, or conflicts of interests within financial conglomerates. The intra-group transactions that would need to be reported are those that are significant between:
- Regulated entities of different sectors belonging to the same financial conglomerate
- Regulated entities of the same sector belonging to the same financial conglomerate
- Regulated entity and a non-regulated entity belonging to the same financial conglomerate
- Regulated entity and any natural or legal person linked to the undertakings of the financial conglomerate by close links
The harmonization will also increase comparability among financial conglomerates of different member states, thus improving supervisory consistency. The harmonized templates are expected to help coordinators and other relevant competent authorities to identify relevant issues and exchange information more efficiently. The draft implementing standards have been submitted to EC for endorsement in the form of a delegated regulation. Following the EC endorsement, the standards will be subject to non-objection by the Parliament and the Council of the European Union.
Effective Date: January 01, 2022
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Insurance, Securities, Reporting, Intra-Group Transaction, FICOD, Risk Concentration, Solvency II, CRR, IFR, ESAs
Previous ArticleEBA Report Confirms Solid Liquidity Position of Banks in EU
BIS published a paper that provides an overview on the use of big data and machine learning in the central bank community.
APRA finalized the reporting standard ARS 115.0 on capital adequacy with respect to the standardized measurement approach to operational risk for authorized deposit-taking institutions in Australia.
ECB published a guide that outlines the principles and methods for calculating the penalties for regulatory breaches of prudential requirements by banks.
MAS and The Association of Banks in Singapore (ABS) jointly issued a paper that sets out good practices for the management of operational and other risks stemming from new work arrangements adopted by financial institutions amid the COVID-19 pandemic.
ACPR announced that a new data collection application, called DLPP (Datalake for Prudential), for collecting banking and insurance prudential data will go into production on April 12, 2021.
BCB announced that the Financial Stability Committee decided to maintain the countercyclical capital buffer (CCyB) for Brazil at 0%, at least until the end of 2021.
EIOPA has launched a European-wide comparative study on non-life underwriting risk in internal models, also kicking-off of the data collection phase.
SRB published an overview of the resolution tools available in the Banking Union and their impact on a bank’s ability to maintain continuity of access to financial market infrastructure services in resolution.
EBA is consulting on the implementing technical standards for Pillar 3 disclosures on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risks, as set out in requirements under Article 449a of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
ESAs Issue Advice on KPIs on Sustainability for Nonfinancial Reporting