While speaking at the BPFI Conference in Dublin, the SRB Chair Elke König discussed the role of SRB, which is primarily to end the concept of "too-big to fail." She described where SRB fits into the overall regulatory structure in EU, before elaborating on the policy areas for the coming year.
According to Dr. König, one of the fundamentals in making banks resolvable is the building up of loss-absorption capacity. Recently, SRB published a new policy document on MREL. In 2018, SRB split the cycle for resolution planning into two waves. This has followed a transitional two-step approach to the MREL-setting process. This recent policy applies to the second wave of resolution plans, which are those of the most complex groups. The first part of this two-wave process was published in November 2018. The first part covered banks that did not have binding targets—those without presence outside the Banking Union. SRB will, therefore, review its policy for MREL-setting for further updates in 2019 on the basis of the publication of the Banking Package in the Official Journal of the European Union, with the aim of charting a consistent path and preparing banks to transition to the new regime as well as to reflect any change necessary due to those requirements potentially coming into force in 2019.
While the 2018 SRB policy follows a number of the elements defined in the 2017 policy, some new elements are added into the 2018 policy. There are three elements of note—namely, location of eligible resources, subordination, and setting of MREL at the individual level. The resolution plans are now in place for all of institutions and the work of SRB has begun to focus on fine-tuning each plan to ensure that it is truly ready to be sprung into action at short notice. "Banks need to build up the required MREL but they also need to develop the playbook on how to operationalize a write-down or bail-in." In this context operational continuity has been considered one of the priorities of 2018 resolution planning cycle. With specific regard to the Irish context, it is worthwhile to mention that there are some domestic banks that have UK subsidiaries, for which the PRA requirements on operational continuity apply since January 01, 2019. However, the banks have taken an overarching group-wide approach to also meet the SRB expectations on operational continuity. She highlighted that the same approach is followed by UK banks with subsidiaries in Ireland, where SRB is the host authority, to ensure that operational continuity in resolution will be achieved on a group-wide basis and not just for group entities in the UK.
She added that part of the SRB resolution planning involves making sure that in times of crisis, operations can continue normally. Irrespective of the service delivery model adopted, banking groups are expected to structure their operational arrangements to facilitate the continuity of critical services in resolution. This particularly requires the following:
- Undertake a comprehensive identification and mapping of critical services to critical functions and core business lines and an adequate documenting of contractual arrangements and service-level agreements
- Maintaining access to key operational assets (such as IT infrastructure) and mitigating key staff departing
- Achieving resolution-resilient contractual service provisions
- Ensuring financial resilience of service provision
- Ensuring appropriate governance arrangements
Related Link: Speech
Keywords: Europe, EU, Ireland, Banking, Loss Absorbing Capacity, MREL, Operational Continuity, Resolution Planning, SRB
Previous ArticleBCBS Updates Basel III Monitoring Workbook and FAQs
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published a new set of frequently asked questions (FAQs) to clarify the regulatory capital treatment of investments in the overseas deposit-taking and insurance subsidiaries.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) issued the policy statement PS20/21, which contains final rules for the application of existing consolidated prudential requirements to financial holding companies and mixed financial holding companies.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final report on the guidelines specifying the criteria to assess the exceptional cases when institutions exceed the large exposure limits and the time and measures needed for institutions to return to compliance.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) revised the guidelines on stress tests to be conducted by the national deposit guarantee schemes under the Deposit Guarantee Schemes Directive (DGSD).
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) issued a circular, for all authorized institutions, to confirm its support of an information note that sets out various options available in the loan market for replacing USD LIBOR with the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR).
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) issued a new "Problem Bank Supervision" booklet of the Comptroller's Handbook. The booklet covers information on timely identification and rehabilitation of problem banks and their advanced supervision, enforcement, and resolution when conditions warrant.
The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) launched a consultation on the standards for market risk capital and the associated reporting requirements for banks incorporated in Singapore.
The tech lab of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) selected three winning teams in a tech sprint designed to explore new technologies and techniques to help banks meet the needs of unbanked consumers.
PRA published a "Dear CEO" letter that sets out findings of a review on the reliability of regulatory reporting and reiterates the supervisory expectations on regulatory reporting.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) confirmed that its new data collection solution APRA Connect will go live on September 13, 2021.