MFSA published a circular for credit institutions on the treatment and reporting of moratoria on loan repayments applied in light of the COVID-19 crisis. The circular aims to provide clarifications about application of the EBA guidelines on legislative and non-legislative moratoria on loan repayments amid the COVID-19 crisis (EBA/GL/2020/02) and as further amended by EBA/GL/2020/08 and by EBA/GL/2020/15. In addition, MFSA updated the guidelines to the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD) IV supervisory reporting requirements for credit institutions, along with the guidelines on supervisory reporting requirements for foreign branches.
EBA guidelines lay down the conditions that shall be met by legislative and non-legislative moratoria granted in the wake of the COVID-19 crisis, to be able to benefit from the preferential treatment outlined in the said guidelines—that is, the forbearance classification will not be triggered. In this respect, MFSA would like to clarify that:
- Any legislative moratoria that have been granted and the conditions which are in line with the provisions of CBM Directive No. 18 on moratoria on credit facilities in exceptional circumstances and the EBA guidelines shall benefit from the preferential treatment provided for in the EBA guidelines
- Any non-legislative moratoria that have been granted and which conditions are in line with the EBA guidelines shall benefit from the preferential treatment provided for in the EBA guidelines
- Any legislative and non-legislative moratoria that have been granted in other jurisdictions, including non-EU countries, and which conditions are in line with the EBA guidelines shall benefit from the preferential treatment provided for in the EBA guidelines
- Any moratoria arising from the effects of the COVID-19 crisis that have been granted prior to publication of the CMB Directive No. 18 (that is, before April 13, 2020) shall be treated as legislative moratoria thus benefitting from the preferential treatment provided for in the EBA guidelines
- Any other moratoria arising from the effects of the COVID-19 crisis, which have been granted on a voluntary basis and individually by a credit institution after the publication of the CBM Directive No. 18 and which conditions are neither fully in line with the Directive nor with the EBA guidelines, shall not be eligible for preferential treatment in accordance with the EBA guidelines.
In terms of reporting requirements pursuant to the Banking Rule 23 and the EBA guidelines on reporting and disclosure of exposures amid COVID-19 crisis, MFSA clarified that moratoria, which are eligible for preferential treatment, shall be considered as EBA-compliant moratoria. Other granted moratoria that are not eligible for preferential treatment shall be considered as “other COVID-19-related forbearance measures.”
- Circular on Treatment and Reporting of Moratoria
- Guidelines for Credit Institutions (XLSX)
- Guidelines for Foreign Branches (XLSX)
- Updates on Supervisory Reporting
Keywords: Europe, Malta, Banking, COVID-19, Loan Moratorium, Loan Repayment, Reporting, CRD IV, Preferential Treatment, EBA, MFSA
Previous ArticleFHFA Finalizes Capital Framework for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac
BIS published a paper that provides an overview on the use of big data and machine learning in the central bank community.
APRA finalized the reporting standard ARS 115.0 on capital adequacy with respect to the standardized measurement approach to operational risk for authorized deposit-taking institutions in Australia.
ECB published a guide that outlines the principles and methods for calculating the penalties for regulatory breaches of prudential requirements by banks.
MAS and The Association of Banks in Singapore (ABS) jointly issued a paper that sets out good practices for the management of operational and other risks stemming from new work arrangements adopted by financial institutions amid the COVID-19 pandemic.
ACPR announced that a new data collection application, called DLPP (Datalake for Prudential), for collecting banking and insurance prudential data will go into production on April 12, 2021.
BCB announced that the Financial Stability Committee decided to maintain the countercyclical capital buffer (CCyB) for Brazil at 0%, at least until the end of 2021.
EIOPA has launched a European-wide comparative study on non-life underwriting risk in internal models, also kicking-off of the data collection phase.
SRB published an overview of the resolution tools available in the Banking Union and their impact on a bank’s ability to maintain continuity of access to financial market infrastructure services in resolution.
EBA is consulting on the implementing technical standards for Pillar 3 disclosures on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risks, as set out in requirements under Article 449a of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
ESAs Issue Advice on KPIs on Sustainability for Nonfinancial Reporting