RBI issued a statement on strengthening governance arrangements with respect to the risk-based internal audit framework. The statement highlights that while the RBI guidance note on risk-based internal audit lays out the basic approach for risk-based internal audit functions, banks are expected to re-orient their approach, in line with the evolving best practices, as a part of their overall governance and internal control framework. Banks are encouraged to adopt the International Internal Audit standards, like those issued by BCBS and the Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA). In a separate statement, RBI announced the opening of a Second Cohort under the Regulatory Sandbox with cross-border payments as its theme. The window for submission of applications for the Cohort shall be open from until February 15, 2021.
RBI also decided to select “micro, small, and medium enterprise (MSME) lending” as the theme for the Third Cohort, the details of which shall be announced in due course. In addition, RBI notified that a working group is being set up to study all aspects of digital lending activities in the regulated financial sector as well as by unregulated players so that an appropriate regulatory approach can be put in place. The terms of reference would require the working group to:
- Evaluate digital lending activities and assess the penetration and standards of outsourced digital lending activities in RBI regulated entities
- Identify risks posed by unregulated digital lending to financial stability, regulated entities, and consumers
- Suggest regulatory changes, if any, to promote orderly growth of digital lending
- Recommend measures, if any, for expansion of specific regulatory or statutory perimeter and suggest the role of various regulatory and government agencies
- Recommend measures for robust data governance, data privacy and data security standards for deployment of digital lending services
Keywords: Asia Pacific, India, Banking, Governance, Internal Audit, Internal Control, Regulatory Sandbox, Cross-Border Payments, Digital Lending, Credit Risk, Regtech, RBI
Previous ArticleECB Analysis Shows Privacy as Biggest Concern in Use of Digital Euro
Next ArticleCMF Consults on Implementation of IFRS 17 in Chile
The Bank of England (BoE) published a consultation paper on approach to setting minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL), an operational guide on executing bail-in, and a statement from the Deputy Governor Dave Ramsden.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) is seeking preliminary input on standardization of the proportionality assessment methodology for credit institutions and investment firms.
Certain regulatory authorities in the US are extending period for completion of the review of certain residential mortgage provisions and for publication of notice disclosing the determination of this review until December 20, 2021.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the policy statement PS18/21, which introduces an amendment in the definition of "higher paid material risk taker" in the Remuneration Part of the PRA Rulebook.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published its annual report on asset encumbrance in banking sector.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published a methodological guide to mystery shopping.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) released a letter to authorized deposit-taking institutions to provide an update on key policy settings for the capital framework reforms, which will come into effect from January 01, 2023.
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) published a report that assesses the business continuity planning activities of financial market infrastructures or FMIs.
The Bank of England (BoE) published questions and answers (Q&A) on OSCA to BEEDS migration for statistical reporting as well a presentation from the project overview session held with statistical reporters.
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) is consulting on a technical amendment to the Basel Framework to reflect a new process reviewing the global systemically important bank (G-SIB) assessment methodology.